Plerosis and Atomic Gestalts

Albertazzi, L. (2002). Towards a neo-Aristotelian theory of continua: Elements of an empirical geometry. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua (pp. 29–80; esp. pp. 44–52). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Albertazzi, L. (2006). Immanent realism: An introduction to Brentano. (pp. 233–268; esp. pp. 248–267). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-4202-7Search in Google Scholar

Albertazzi, L. (2015). Spatial elements in visual awareness. Challenges for an intrinsic “Geometry” of the visible. Philosophia Scientiæ, 19(3), 95–125.Search in Google Scholar

Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 184–193.10.1037/h0054663Search in Google Scholar

Bakalis, N. (2005). Handbook of Greek philosophy: From Thales to the Stoics analysis and fragments. Victoria, BC, Canada: Trafford Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, J. (2006). The continuous and the infinitesimal in mathematics and philosophy. Monza, Italy: Polimetrica.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, J. (2009). Cohesiveness. Intellectica, 9(1), 51.10.3406/intel.2009.1736Search in Google Scholar

Bijl, P., Koenderink, J. J., & Toet, A. (1989). Visibility of blobs with a Gaussian luminance profile. Vision Research, 29(4), 447–456.10.1016/0042-6989(89)90008-4Search in Google Scholar

Blum, M. (1967). A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape. In W. Wathen-Dunn (Ed.), Models for the perception of speech and visual form (pp. 362–380). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boime, A. (1993). The art of the Macchia and the Risorgimento. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226(241), 177–178.10.1038/226177a05437004Search in Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1974, [1874]). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker und Humblot. (English quotations from: “Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint”. New York: Humanities Press).10.28937/978-3-7873-2662-4Search in Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1988). Philosophical investigations on space, time and the continuum (Smith, Trans.). London, England: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Broude, N. (1987). The Macchiaioli: Italian painters of the nineteenth century. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brouwer, L. E. J. (1918). Begründung der Mengenlehre unabhängig vom logischen Satz vom ausgeschlossenen Dritten. Erster Teil, Allgemeine Mengenlehre. KNAW Verhandlungen, 5, 1–43.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J. W. (1977). Mind, brain and consciousness. New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cartan, É (1923). Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie). Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 40, 325–412.10.24033/asens.751Search in Google Scholar

Cateura, L. (1995). Oil painting secrets from a master. New York, NY: Watson & Guptill.Search in Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. (1992). St. Augustine, Confessions. [orig. 397-400CE]. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dedekind, R. (1872). Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen. Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg, p. 18.Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, C. (1995). Conversations in paint, a notebook of fundamentals. New York, NY: Workman Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ehrlich, P. (2006). The rise of non-Archimedean mathematics and the roots of a misconception. I. The emergence of non-Archimedean systems of magnitudes. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 60(1), 1–121.10.1007/s00407-005-0102-4Search in Google Scholar

Elkind, D. (1964). Studies in perceptual development II, part-whole. Child Development, 35(1), 81–90.10.2307/1126573Search in Google Scholar

Euclid. (1956, [fl. 300BCE]). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements, (Translation and Commentaries by Heath, T. L.), Three volumes. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Feynman, R. (1966). The character of physical law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Florack, L. (1997). Image structure. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-8845-4Search in Google Scholar

Geem, Z. W., Kim, J. H., & Loganathan, G. V. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60–68.10.1177/003754970107600201Search in Google Scholar

Giordano, P. (2001). Nilpotent infinitesimals and synthetic differential geometry in classical logic. In P. Schuster, U. Berger, & H. Osswald (Eds.), Reuniting the antipodes–constructive and nonstandard views of the continuum (pp. 75–92). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Gödel, K. (1960, [1947]). What is Cantor’s continuum problem? The American Mathematical Monthly, 54, 515–525. (originally published in 1947, Page references are to the reprinting of the expanded 1960 version in Benacerraf and Putnam 1983, pp. 420–485).10.1080/00029890.1947.11991877Search in Google Scholar

Hartline, H. K. (1938). The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. The American Journal of Physiology, 121, 400–415.10.1152/ajplegacy.1938.121.2.400Search in Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. (1980, [1899]). The foundations of geometry (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D. D. (2009). The interface theory of perception. In S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, & B. Schiele (Eds.), Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives (pp. 148–165). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 195, 215–243.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1991, [1893-1917]). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893-1917) (J. B. Brough, Trans.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3718-8Search in Google Scholar

Imbriano, V. (1868). La quinta promotrice 1878-1868: Appendici di Vittorio Imbriani. Napoli, Italy: Tipografia Napolitana.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, T. S. (1986). Light for the Artist. NewYork, NY: Watson-Guptill.Search in Google Scholar

Kandinsky, W. (1926). In W. Gropius & L. Moholy-Nagy (Eds.), Punkt und Linie zu Fläche. Bauhaus Bücher, Schriftleitung München, Germany: Verlag Albert Langen.Search in Google Scholar

Kanizsa, G. (1980). Grammatica del vedere. Saggi su percezione e Gestalt. Bologna, Italy: IL Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (1984). The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics, 50, 363–370.10.1007/BF003369616477978Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (1988). Operational significance of receptive field assemblies. Biological Cybernetics, 58(3), 163–171.10.1007/BF003641363358951Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (1990). The brain a geometry engine. Psychological Research, 52(2–3), 122–127.10.1007/BF008775192281124Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (1993). What is a “feature”? Journal of Intelligent Systems, 3(1), 49–82.10.1515/JISYS.1993.3.1.49Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (2002). Continua in vision. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua, advances in consciousness research 41 (pp. 101–118). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (2011). Vision as a user interface. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE, Vol. 7865: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVI (pp. 1–13). San Francisco: SPIE-IS&T.Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (2014). The all seeing eye. Perception, 43, 1–6.10.1068/p4301ed24689127Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J. (2015). Ontology of the mirror world. Gestalt Theory, 37(2), 119–140.Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., Albertazzi, L., van Doorn, A. J., van Ee, R., van de Grind, W. A., Kappers, A. M. L., … de Vries, S. (2010). Does monocular visual space contain planes? Acta Psychologica (Amst), 134(1), 40–47.10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.00220053390Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., & Richards, W. A. (1988). Two-dimensional curvature operators. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5(7), 1136–1141.10.1364/JOSAA.5.001136Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1990). Receptive field families. Biological Cybernetics, 63(4), 291–297.10.1007/BF00203452Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1992a). Generic neighbourhood operators. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14, 597–605.10.1109/34.141551Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1992b). Receptive field assembly pattern specificity. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 3(1), 1–12.10.1016/1047-3203(92)90026-PSearch in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1997). Local image operators and iconic structure. In G. Sommer & J. J. Koenderink (Eds.), Proceedings of the AFPAC’97. Algebraic Frames for the Perception-Action Cycle (pp. 66–93). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Pinna, B. (2015). Psychogenesis of Gestalt. Gestalt Theory, 37(3), 287–304.Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Albertazzi, L., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Relief articulation techniques. Art & Perception, 3(2), 151–171.10.1163/22134913-00002032Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Pinna, B., & Wagemans, J. (2016). Boundaries, transitions and passages. Art & Perception, 4(3), 185–204.10.1163/22134913-00002050Search in Google Scholar

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY: Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B, 207, 187–217.Search in Google Scholar

Metzger, W. (1936). Gesetze des Sehens. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: W. Kramer & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Panconi, T. (1999). Antologia dei Macchiaioli, La trasformazione sociale e artica nella Toscana di metà 800. Pisa, Italy: Pacini Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Pasch, M. (1912). [first edition 1882], Vorlesungen uber neuere Geometrie (2nd ed.). Leipzig, Germany: B.G. Teubner, p. 21.Search in Google Scholar

Photoshop. (2014). Adobe, Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/mena_en/products/photoshop.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Pinna, B. (2008). Watercolor illusion. Scholarpedia, 3(1), 5352.10.4249/scholarpedia.5352Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B. (2010). New Gestalt principles of perceptual organization: An extension from grouping to shape and meaning. Gestalt Theory, 32(1), 11–78.Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B. (2012). Perceptual organization of shape, color, shade and lighting in visual and pictorial objects. i-Perception, 3, 257–281.10.1068/i0460aapSearch in Google Scholar

Pinna, B., & Albertazzi, L. (2011). From grouping to visual meanings: A new theory of perceptual organization. In L. Albertazzi, G. van Tonder, & D. Vishwanath (Eds.), Information in perception (pp. 288–344). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B., Brelstaff, G., & Spillmann, L. (2001). Surface color from boundaries: A new ‘watercolor’ illusion. Vision Research, 41, 2669–2676.10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00105-5Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B., & Deiana, K. (2015). The syntax organization of shape and color and the laws of coloration in vision, art and biology. Art & Perception, 3(3), 319–345.10.1163/22134913-00002034Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B., & Grossberg, S. (2005). The watercolor illusion and neon color spreading: A unified analysis of new cases and neural mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 22, 2207–2221.10.1364/JOSAA.22.002207Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B., & Reeves, A. (2006). Lighting, backlighting and watercolor illusions and the laws of figurality. Spatial Vision, 19, 341–373.10.1163/156856806776923434Search in Google Scholar

Pinna, B., Spillmann, L., & Werner, J. (2003). The watercolor effect: A new principle of grouping and figure-ground organization. Vision Research, 43, 43–52.10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00132-3Search in Google Scholar

Richards, W. R., & Bobick, A. (1988). Playing twenty questions with nature. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.), Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3–26). The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Series in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, W.R. (1982, December): How to play twenty questions with nature and win (M.I.T. A.I. Memo 660).Search in Google Scholar

Riedl, R. (1975). Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Systembedingungen der Evolution. Hamburg, Germany: Paul Parey.Search in Google Scholar

Riemann, B. (2013). [Habilitationsvortrag 10. Juni 1854]. Über die Hypothesen, Welche der Geometrie zu Grunde Liegen. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Roeper, P. (2006). The Aristotelian continuum. A formal characterization. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 47(2), 211–232.Search in Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life?. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spillmann, L. (1971). Foveal perceptive fields in the human visual system measured with simultaneous contrast in grids and bars. Pflügers Archiv, 326(4), 281–299.10.1007/BF005869935105991Search in Google Scholar

Stevin, S. (1585). In A. J. E. M. Smeur (Ed.), De Thiende (p. 1965). Nieuwkoop, Netherlands: De Graaf.Search in Google Scholar

Stoltz, O. (1883). Zur Geometrie der Alten, insbesondere über ein Axiom des Archimedes. Mathematische Annalen, 22, 504–519.10.1007/BF01443264Search in Google Scholar

ter Haar Romeny, B. M. (2003). Front-end vision and multi-scale image analysis. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-1-4020-8840-7Search in Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1952). The curious behavior of the stickleback. Scientific American, 187(6), 22–26.10.1038/scientificamerican1252-22Search in Google Scholar

van Dalen, D. (1997). How connected is the intuitionistic continuum? The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 62(4), 1147–1150.10.2307/2275631Search in Google Scholar

Veronese, G. (1894). Grundzüge der Geometrie von mehreren Dimensionen und mehreren Arten gradliniger Einheiten in elementarer Form entwickelt (Uebersetzt von A. Schepp). Leipzig, Germany: B.G. Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

von Uexküll, J. (1920). Theoretische Biologie. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, E. H. (1846). Tastsinn und Gemeingefühl. In R. Wagner (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Physiologie mit Rücksicht auf physiologische Pathologie (Band 3 ed., pp. 481–588). Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1922): Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, I: Prinzipielle Bemerkungen. Psychologische Forschung, 1, pp. 47–58. [Translated extract reprinted as “The general theoretical situation.” In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), (1938). A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 12–16). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.].Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1923): Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, pp. 301–350. [Translated as “Investigations on Gestalt principles, II. In L. Spillmann (Ed.), (2012). On motion and figure-ground organization (pp. 127–182). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press].Search in Google Scholar

Weyl, H. (1925). On the current epistemological situation in mathematics [English translation of Die Heutige Erkenntnislage in der Mathematik, Symposion, 1, 1925–1927, 1–32.] In P. Mancosu (Ed.) (1998), pp. 123–142.Search in Google Scholar