Tutor Emotional Competences Valued by Learners in a Blended Learning Contex

  • 1 The University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, England, HD1 3DH, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Abstract

This paper outlines research into the emotional competences that mature, higher education students, undertaking part-time blended learning degrees within a School of Education, value in their tutors. A mixed methods approach was adopted to conduct a detailed exploration of eight tutors’ practice whilst teaching a module, with data gathered from three principal sources. Learners’ perceptions of their experiences were assessed using a questionnaire; interviews with tutors explored their approaches to delivery and considered factors that impacted on quality; and, an analysis of the content and communications in the virtual learning environment provided insight into tutors’ online practice. Goleman’s (2001) Framework of Emotional Competences provided a lens through which to analyse blended tutors’ practices in relation to learner perceptions. The paper proposes a framework of emotional competences that appeared to contribute to tutor effectiveness in this context. This research questions the value of some of Goleman’s relationship management competences, with the proposed framework developed to add further self-management competences. This was due, in part, to the measures evident by some tutors to effectively support these particular learners at a distance. The proposed framework could support recruitment and selection within higher education, and provide a language for discussing further research into blended and online tutors’ emotional competences.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abdous, M. H. (2011). A process-oriented framework for acquiring online teaching competencies. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(1), 60-77.

  • 2. Afacan, Y. (2014). Blended Learning for Non-studio Courses: Interior Architecture Student Experiences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1599-1603. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814004583

  • 3. Aydin, C. H. (2005). Turkish Mentors’ Perception of Roles, Competencies and Resources for Online Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/makale_goster.php?id=208

  • 4. Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439.

  • 5. Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory: Technical Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

  • 6. Barker, P. (2002). On being an online tutor. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 3-13.

  • 7. Bawane, J., & Spector, J. M. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383-397.

  • 8. Beetham, H. (2012). Institutional Approaches to Curriculum Design: Final Synthesis Report. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/5081/1/JISC_Curriculum_Design_Final_Synthesis_i1.pdf

  • 9. Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-248.

  • 10. Berge, Z. (2009). Changing instructor’s roles in virtual worlds. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(4), 407-415.

  • 11. British Council (2014). Massification of higher education in large academic systems. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/massification_seminar_in_delhi_-_a_summary_report.pdf

  • 12. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • 13. Creanor, L. (2002). A Tale of Two Courses: a comparative study of tutoring online. Open Learning, 17(1), 57-68.

  • 14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage Publications.

  • 15. De George-Walker, L. D., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1-13.

  • 16. Denis, B., Watland, P., Pirotte, S., & Verday, N. (2004). Roles and competencies of the etutor. Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference, 2004, 5-7. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2004/proceedings/symposia/symposium6/denis_et_al.htm

  • 17. Dykman, C. A., & Davis, C. K. (2008). Online Education Forum: Part Two - Teaching Online versus Teaching Conventionally. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(2), 157-164.

  • 18. Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.

  • 19. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.

  • 20. Goleman, D. (2001). An EI-Based Theory of Performance. In C. Cherniss & D. Goleman (Eds.), The Emotionally Intelligent Workplace: How to Select for, Measure, and Improve Emotional Intelligence in Individuals, Groups, and Organization (pp. 27-44). San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.

  • 21. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65-72.

  • 22. Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199-206.

  • 23. Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54, 693-700.

  • 24. Holmberg, B. (2005). The evolution, principles, and practices of distance education. Oldenburg, Germany: BIS - Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Univesität Oldenburg.

  • 25. King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research (pp. 256-271). London: Sage Publications.

  • 26. Kreber, C., & Kanuka, H. (2006). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the online classroom. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 32(2), 109-131.

  • 27. MacDonald, J. (2006). Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: A Good Practice Guide. Aldershot: Gower.

  • 28. Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2002). Emotional Intelligence: Science and Myth. London: The MIT Press.

  • 29. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Educators (pp. 3-31). New York: Basic Books.

  • 30. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150.

  • 31. Richardson, J. T. E., Long, G. L., & Woodley, A. (2003). Academic Engagement and Perceptions of Quality in Distance Education. Open Learning, 18(3), 223-244.

  • 32. Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

  • 33. Salmon, G., & Wright, P. (2014). Transforming Future Teaching through ‘Carpe Diem’ Learning Design. Education Sciences, 4(1), 52-63.

  • 34. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality, 9(3), 185-211.

  • 35. Setlhako, M. A. (2014). Competencies Required for the Facilitation of Online Learning Courses: An Online Teaching Assistants Competency Based Approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1405-1412.

  • 36. Schichtel, M. (2010). Core-competence skills in e-mentoring for medical educators: A conceptual exploration. Medical teacher, 32(7), 248-262.

  • 37. Varvel, V. E. (2007). Master online teacher competencies. Online journal of distance learning administration, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www2.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/

  • 38. Waha, B., & Davis, K. (2014). University students’ perspective on blended learning. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 172-182.

  • 39. Wakeman, C. (2006). Emotional Intelligence: Testing, measurement and analysis. Research in Education, 75, 71-93.

  • 40. Wheeler, S. (2015). Learning with ‘e’s. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.

  • 41. Wiesenberg, F., & Hutton, S. (1996). Computer Mediated Conferencing. Journal of the Alberta Association for Continuing Education, 24, 9-16.

  • 42. Williams, P. E. (2003). Roles and competencies for distance education programs in higher education institutions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 45-57.

  • 43. Zeidner, M., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). What We Know about Emotional Intelligence: How It Affects Learning, Work, Relationships, and Our Mental Health. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search