This paper studies the transactional distance between the students and the tutor as well as the autonomy of students in a postgraduate course of the Hellenic Open University (HOU). The aim of the paper is to examine how the relation between autonomy and transactional distance evolves during an academic year and how this relation is affected by demographic parameters, such as gender, age group and student experience (year of studies). For this purpose an empirical research was conducted and a sample of postgraduate students responded to a questionnaire (which included a scale for transactional distance, a scale for autonomy and demographic questions) during two different time periods within an academic (2012-2013). The results of the statistical analysis showed that during the evolution of the learning process there was a small change in transactional distance, especially for the dimension of co-understanding, while there was also a change in one of the dimensions of autonomy, namely sensitivity to others. However, no relation was observed between transactional distance and autonomy, ether in the first or the second measurement during the academic year. This finding is also regarded in the overall framework of the different critiques and interpretations of Moore’s theory.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Bekker, M.H.J. (1993). The development of an Autonomy scale based on recent insights into gender identity. In European Journal of Personality, 7, (pp. 177-194).
2. Bekker, M.H.J.; Bachrach, N.; Croon, M.A. (2007). The relationships of antisocial behavior with attachment, autonomy-connectedness, and alexithymia. In Journal of Critical Psychology, 63(6), (pp. 507-527).
3. Bekker, M.H.J. and Belt, U. (2006). The role of autonomy-connectedness in anxiety and depression. In Depression and Anxiety, 23, (pp. 274-280).
4. Bekker, M.H.J.; Hens, G.; Nijssen, A. (2001). Stress prevention training; Sex differences in types of stressors, coping, and training effects. In Stress and Health, 17, (pp. 207-218).
5. Bekker, M.H.J. and van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2006). A short form of the Autonomy scale: Properties of the Autonomy–Connectedness Scale. In Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, (pp. 51-60).
6. Bekker, M.H.J. and van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2008). Autonomy-Connectedness and Gender. In Sex Roles, 59, (pp. 532-544).
7. Bischoff, W.R. (1993). Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implications for professional education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
8. Bischoff, W.R.; Bisconer, S.W.; Kooker, B.M.; Woods, L.C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. In American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), (pp. 4-19).
9. Chen, Y.J. (1997). The implications of Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
10. Chen, Y.J. (2001a). Transactional distance in world wide web learning environments. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), (pp. 327-338).
11. Chen, Y.J. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in world wide web learning environment: A factor analysis. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), (pp. 459-470).
12. Chen, Y.J. and Willits, F.K. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), (pp. 51-65).
13. Force, D. (2004). Relationships among transactional distance variables in asynchronous computer conferences: A correlational study. Unpublished master thesis. Athabasca University, Athabasca.
17. Giossos, I.; Koutsouba, I.M.; Mavroidis, I. (2011). Validating a scale for transactional distance in distance education. In A. Lionarakis (ed.), Alternative Forms of Education, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp. 303-310). Available at http://icodl.openet.gr/index.php/icodl/2011/schedConf/presentations
18. Gorsky, A. and Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance. In The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), (pp. 1-11).
19. Huang, H.M. (2002). Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. In International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), (pp. 405-422).
20. Kanuka, H.; Collet, D.; Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), (pp. 151-167).