[1. Bekker, M.H.J. (1993). The development of an Autonomy scale based on recent insights into gender identity. In European Journal of Personality, 7, (pp. 177-194).10.1002/per.2410070304]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bekker, M.H.J.; Bachrach, N.; Croon, M.A. (2007). The relationships of antisocial behavior with attachment, autonomy-connectedness, and alexithymia. In Journal of Critical Psychology, 63(6), (pp. 507-527).10.1002/jclp.20363]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bekker, M.H.J. and Belt, U. (2006). The role of autonomy-connectedness in anxiety and depression. In Depression and Anxiety, 23, (pp. 274-280).10.1002/da.20178]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bekker, M.H.J.; Hens, G.; Nijssen, A. (2001). Stress prevention training; Sex differences in types of stressors, coping, and training effects. In Stress and Health, 17, (pp. 207-218).10.1002/smi.900]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bekker, M.H.J. and van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2006). A short form of the Autonomy scale: Properties of the Autonomy–Connectedness Scale. In Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, (pp. 51-60).10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_07]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bekker, M.H.J. and van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2008). Autonomy-Connectedness and Gender. In Sex Roles, 59, (pp. 532-544).10.1007/s11199-008-9447-x]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bischoff, W.R. (1993). Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implications for professional education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Bischoff, W.R.; Bisconer, S.W.; Kooker, B.M.; Woods, L.C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. In American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), (pp. 4-19).10.1080/08923649609526937]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Chen, Y.J. (1997). The implications of Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Chen, Y.J. (2001a). Transactional distance in world wide web learning environments. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), (pp. 327-338).10.1080/14703290110074533]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Chen, Y.J. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in world wide web learning environment: A factor analysis. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), (pp. 459-470).10.1111/1467-8535.00213]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Chen, Y.J. and Willits, F.K. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), (pp. 51-65).]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Force, D. (2004). Relationships among transactional distance variables in asynchronous computer conferences: A correlational study. Unpublished master thesis. Athabasca University, Athabasca.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for Distance Education in the 21st century: A swift from structural to transactional issues. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). Available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/2/2210.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Giossos, I. (2009). Validity and reliability for transactional distance scales in the Hellenic Open University. Master dissertation. School of Humanities, Hellenic Open University, Patras.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Giossos, Y.; Koutsouba, M.; Lionarakis, A.; Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance theory. In European Journal of Open Distance and ELearning, 2009/II. Available at http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2009&halfyear=2&article=374]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Giossos, I.; Koutsouba, I.M.; Mavroidis, I. (2011). Validating a scale for transactional distance in distance education. In A. Lionarakis (ed.), Alternative Forms of Education, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp. 303-310). Available at http://icodl.openet.gr/index.php/icodl/2011/schedConf/presentations]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Gorsky, A. and Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance. In The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), (pp. 1-11).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Huang, H.M. (2002). Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. In International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), (pp. 405-422).]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kanuka, H.; Collet, D.; Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), (pp. 151-167).10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_3]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Kassandrinou, A.; Angelaki, Ch.; Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students. How does it affect the learning process. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), (pp. 26-42). Available at http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2014/Kassandrinou_et_al.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education, (pp. 22-38). Routledge, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Massachusetts.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Saba, F. (1988). Integrated telecommunication systems and instructional transaction. In American Journal of Distance Education, 2(3), (pp. 17-24).10.1080/08923648809526632]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Saba, F. and Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), (pp. 36-59).10.1080/08923649409526844]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Starr-Glass, D. (2012). Learners perceptions of distance in an online course: revisiting Moore’s theory of transactional distance. Unpublished paper.]Search in Google Scholar
