The Role of Rural Heterogeneity in Knowledge Mobilisation and Sociotechnical Transitions: Reflections from a Study on Electric Vehicles as an Alternative Technology for Cornwall, UK

Open access

Abstract

Mobilising knowledges across a geography creates opportunities for transitions to smart systems. Publics in a geography are consequently able to form their perspectives around a system and align potential benefits with their needs. Intelligent transport systems are an example of smart living and EVs are cited as an alternative technology that are key to their application. This conceptual paper uses EVs as an example to demonstrate how knowledge mobilisation relating to such technologies can better cater to a geography’s needs. Unfortunately, current EV studies focus on a rural-urban binary. Thus, this conceptual contribution reflects on a study in Cornwall, UK, to reveal the heterogeneous influences on rural EV-related perspectives. This heterogeneity manifests both in particular locations and across cases. Overall a suite of transferrable participatory methods to improve rural knowledge mobilisation is outlined.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Axsen J. & Kurani K. S. (2012). Who can recharge a plug-in electric vehicle at home? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 17(5): 349–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2012.03.001.

  • [2] Barr S. (2011). Climate Forums: virtual discourses on climate change and the sustainable lifestyle. Area 43(1): 14–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00958.x.

  • [3] Barre A. Suarda F. Gérard M. Montaru M. & Riu D. (2013) Statistical analysis for understanding and predicting battery degradations in real-life electric vehicle use. Journal of Power Sources 245: 886–856. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.052.

  • [4] Brinkman J. & Hirsh R. (2017). Welcoming Wind Turbines and the PIMBY (“Please in My Backyard”) Phenomenon: The Culture of the Machine in the Rural American Midwest. Technology and Culture 58(2) 335–367.

  • [5] Brulle R. J. Carmichael J. & Jenkins J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S. 2002 – 2010. Climatic Change 114(2): 169–188. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y.

  • [6] Bunce L. Harris M. & Burgess M. (2014). Charge up then charge out? Drivers’ perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 59: 278–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.001.

  • [7] Chilvers J. & Longhurst N. (2016). Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced Emergent and Diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(5) 585–607. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483.

  • [8] Cotton M. & Devine-Wright P. (2012). Making electricity networks ‘visible’: industry actor constructions of ‘publics’ and public engagement in infrastructure planning. Public Understanding of Science 21(1) 17–35. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510362658.

  • [9] Docherty I. Marsden G. & Anable J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 115 114–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012.

  • [10] Egbue O. & Long S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48: 717–729. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009.

  • [11] Elo S. & Kyngas H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. The Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1): 107–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

  • [12] Esmene S. Taylor T. & Leyshon M. (2017). Knowledge experience and the circus: academic perspectives on the processes of communicating the environmental and health impacts of electric vehicles. Local Environment 22(6) 651–666. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1250736.

  • [13] Gamble J. Muggleston S. Hedderley D. Parminter T. & Richardson-Harman N. (2000). Genetic engineering: The public’s point of view. Report to Stakeholders. [research report]. Auckland: Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Limited.

  • [14] Gray D. Farrington J. Shaw J. Martin S. & Roberts D. (2001). Car dependence in rural Scotland: transport policy devolution and the impact of the fuel duty escalator. Journal of Rural Studies 17(1): 113–135. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00035-8.

  • [15] Harshaw H. W. & Sheppard S. R. J. (2013). Using the recreation opportunity spectrum to evaluate the temporal impacts of timber harvesting on outdoor recreation settings. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 1–2: 40–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2013.03.001.

  • [16] Hermwille L. (2016). The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 11 237–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001.

  • [17] Holland S. Mansur E. Muller N. & Yates A. (2016). Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors. American Economic Review. 106(12) 3700–3729. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20150897.

  • [18] Kaesehage K. Leyshon M. Ferns G. & Leyshon C. (2017). Seriously Personal: the Reasons that Motivate Entrepreneurs to Address Climate Change. Journal of Business Ethics157(4) 1091–1109. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3624-1.

  • [19] Jaďuďová J. Marková I. Vicianová J. Bohers A. & Murin I. (2018). Study of Consumer Preferences of Regional Labeling. Slovak Case Study. European Countryside 10(3) 429–441. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0024.

  • [20] Larson P. D. Viafara J. Parsons R. V. & Elias A. (2014). Consumer attitudes about electric cars: Pricing analysis and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 69: 299–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.002.

  • [21] Latour B. & Weibel P. (2005). Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge MS: MIT Press.

  • [22] Mathiesen B. Lund H. Connolly D. Wenzel H. Østergaard P. Möller B. Nielsen S. Ridjan I. Karnøe P. Sperling K. & Hvelplund F. (2015). Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions. Applied Energy 145 pp. 139–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.075.

  • [23] Newman D. Wells P. Donovan C. Nieuwenhuis P. & Davies H. (2014). Urban sub-urban or rural: where is the best place for electric vehicles? International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 14(4) 306. DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2014.065295.

  • [24] O’Neill S. J. & Smith N. (2014). Climate change and visual imagery. WIREs Clim Change 2014 5: 73–87. DOIi: 10.1002/wcc.249.

  • [25] Peters A. & Dutschke E. (2014). How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 16(3): 358–377. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.879037.

  • [26] Plotz P. Schneider U. Globisch J. & Dütschke E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 67: 96–109. 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006.

  • [27] Poggi F. Firmino A. & Amado M. (2017). SMART RURAL: a model for planning net-zero energy balance at municipal level. Energy Procedia 122 56–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.287.

  • [28] Ryglová K. Rašovská I. Šácha J. & Maráková V. (2018). Building Customer Loyalty in Rural Destinations as a Pre-Condition of Sustainable Competitiveness. Sustainability 10(4) 957. DOI: 10.3390/su10040957.

  • [29] Schot J. Kanger L. & Verbong G. (2016). The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nature Energy 1(5) 16054. DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.54.

  • [30] Simock N. MacGregor S. Catney P. Dobson A. Ormerod M. Robinson Z. Ross S. Royston S. & Hall S. M. (2014). Factors influencing perceptions of domestic energy information: content source and process. Energy Policy 65: 455–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.038.

  • [31] Siwach M. & Dahiya A. (2009). Knowledge and Utilization of Consumer Education by Rural and Urban Women. Journal of Human Ecology 25(1) 41–44. DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2009.11906133.

  • [32] Thorstensen E. Forsberg E. Underthun A. Danihelka P. & Řeháček J. (2016). Regional Development and Climate Change Adaptation: A Study of the Role of Legitimacy. European Countryside 8(3) 207–226. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0016.

  • [33] Tiessen H. Brklacich M. Breulmann G. & Menezes R. S. C. (2008). Communicating Global Change Science to Society. Washington DC: Island Press.

  • [34] Truffer B. Störmer E. Maurer M. & Ruef A. (2010). Local strategic planning processes and sustainability transitions in infrastructure sectors. Environmental Policy and Governance 20(4) 258–269. DOI: 10.1002/eet.550.

  • [35] Von Essen E. & Allen M. (2017). Taking Prejudice Seriously: Burkean Reflections on the Rural Past and Present. Sociologia Ruralis 58(3) 543–561. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12183.

  • [36] Wolf J. & Moser S. C. (2011). Individual understandings perceptions and engagement with climate change: insights from in-depth studies across the world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(4): 547–569. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.120.

  • [37] Wood J. Brown J. Bond M. & Suguri V. (2016). Older Adult Transportation in Rural Communities: Results of an Agency Survey. Journal of Public Transportation 19(2) 154–167. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.19.2.9.

  • [38] Wu G. Inderbitzin A. & Bening C. (2015). Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: A probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments. Energy Policy 80 196–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.004.

  • [39] Wynne B. E. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1(3): 281–304. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004.

  • [40] Zhang L. Brown T. & Samuelsen S. (2013). Evaluation of charging infrastructure requirements and operating costs for plug-in electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources 240: 515–524. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.048.

  • [41] Climate Outreach (2014). Climate Outreach and Information Network: Communicating Climate Change. Available from: http://www.climateoutreach.org.uk/communicating-climate-change/ [Accessed: 18/01/2019].

  • [42] Cornwall Council (2011). Data and research. Useful facts and figures about Cornwall. Cornwall UK. Cornwall Council. Available from: http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/default.aspx?page=2035 [Accessed:29/01/2019].

  • [43] Cornwall Council (2019). Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly Community Profiles. Cornwall Council. Available from: https://cornwall.communityinsight.org/ [Accessed: 18/11/2019].

  • [44] Department for Transport (2012). The plug-in car grant extended to vans. London UK. Department for Transport. Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/press-releases/dft-press-20120117/ [Accessed: 6/02/2019].

  • [45] Office for National Statistics (2011). The 2011 rural/urban classification. Office of National Statistics UK. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/geography/products/area-classifications/2011-rural-urban/index.html [Accessed: 20/02/2019].

  • [46] Office for National Statistics (2012). Population Estimates for UK England and Wales Scotland and Northern Ireland Mid-2011 and Mid-2012. Office of National Statistics UK. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/pop-estimate/population-estimates-for-uk-england-and-wales-scotland-and-northern-ireland/mid-2011-and-mid-2012/index.html [Accessed: 11/02/2017].

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 95 95 95
PDF Downloads 78 78 78