Interpretation of Geoheritage for Geotourism – a Comparison of Chinese geoparks and National Parks in the United States

Open access

Abstract

This study presents an interpretation system model of geoheritage to facilitate the understanding of geoscience knowledge by the common lay person. Interpretation system construction is crucial to geoparks and is a shared value. The improvement of the effectiveness of geoheritage interpretation is still under exploration. Therefore, the interpretation systems of two global geoparks in China are outlined and compared with the interpretation system in Zion National Park in the United States. From lessons and experiences, this paper suggests utilizing geotourism as a complete contextual communication system, in which a geopark (source) delivers information about its unique cultural and natural values to target tourists (receivers) through tourism activities (channels). The communication effect of geotourism is monitored by feedback from tourists through the post-travel surveys or activities. We expect that this model will provide a better interpretation of geoheritage with a new perspective.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bailey H. & Hill W. (2010). The Future of North American Geoparks. The George Wright Forum 27 (November 1) 52-59. Retrieved from http:// http://www.georgewright.org/271bailey.pdf.

  • Barron et al. (2011). Geological input to a Landscape Character Assessment of the Cairngorms National Park (Open Report OR/10/003). Edinburgh UK: British Geological Survey. Retrieved from http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/18481/1/OR10003.pdf.

  • Ceballos-Lascurain H. (1996). Tourism ecotourism and protected areas: The state of nature-based tourism around the world and guidelines for its development. Gland Switzerland: IUCN.

  • Chen A. (2003). Some problems about the construction of National Geological park of China. Resources and Industries 1 58-64.

  • Craig R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication theory 9(2) 119-161.

  • Department of the Interior of the United States. (2009). Budget Justification and Performance Information: Fiscal Year 2010: National Park Service. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/aboutus/upload/FY_2010_greenbook.pdf.

  • Dowling R. K. (2011). Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage 3(1) 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7.

  • Farsani N. T. Coelho C. & Costa C. (2011). Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. International Journal of Tourism Research 13(1) 68-81. DOI: 10.1002/jtr.800.

  • GEDMLR (Geological Environment Department of the Ministry of Land and Resources). (2006). Operating Instructions for Establishment of Chinese National Parks. Geological Publishing House.

  • GGN (Global Geopark Network) UNESCO. (2010). Guidelines and Criteria for National Geoparks seeking UNESCO’s assistance to join the Global Geoparks Network (GGN). Retrieved from http:// www.globalgeopark.org/portals/1/documents/2008ggn-guidelinesjuneendorsed.pdf.

  • Gordon B. (1986). The souvenir: Messenger of the extraordinary. The Journal of Popular Culture 20(3) 135-146. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-3840.1986.2003_135.x.

  • Gordon J. E. (2012). Rediscovering a sense of wonder: geoheritage geotourism and cultural landscape experiences. Geoheritage 4(1-2) 65-77. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-011-0051-z.

  • GSA (Gefological Society of America). (2011). Geoheritage: Position Statement draft. Retrieved from http://www.geosociety.org/positions.

  • Hitchcock M. & Teague K. (2000). Souvenirs: the material culture of tourism. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  • Johnson A. M. & Lederer A. L. (2005). The effect of communication frequency and channel richness on the convergence between chief executive and chief information officers. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(2) 227-252.

  • Kao D. T. (2013). The impacts of goal orientation terminology effect and source credibility on communication effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43(10) 2007-2016. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12154.

  • Kejian X. & Lei L. (2010). Research on the designing of the interpretation panel of geoparks. In 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering (ICISE) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

  • Lin M. T. (2008). Problems in Popular Science Function Display of Geoparks and countermeasures - With Taimushan State Geopark in Fujian Province as an Example. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources 3.

  • Newsome D. & Dowling R. (2010). Setting an agenda for geotourism. In Newsome D. & Dowling R. K. (Eds.). Geotourism: the tourism of geology and landscape. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Limited.

  • Nowlan G. S. et al. (2004). Protection of geological heritage: A North American perspective on Geoparks. Episodes-Newsmagazine of the International Union of Geological Sciences 27(3) 172-176.

  • Nowlan G. S. Bobrowsky P. & Clague J. (2004). Protection of geological heritage: A North American perspective on Geoparks. Episodes-Newsmagazine of the International Union of Geological Sciences 27(3) 172-176.

  • NPS (National Park Service) U.S. Department of the Interior. (2005). Government Printing Office FY 2006 President’s Budget Executive Summary; Challenges. Tourism Planning & Development (ahead-of-print) 1-11.

  • NPS (National Park Service) U.S. Department of the Interior. (2009). Interpretive Development Program. Downloadable Documents. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/idp/interp/download.htm.

  • Pan J. (1995). World culture and nature heritage of China. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).

  • Quill T. E. (1995). Barriers to effective communication. In Lipkin M. et al. (Eds.) The Medical Interview (pp. 110-121). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2488-4_8.

  • Ren F. (2012). The interplay between Taoist philosophy Danxia Landscape and human beings - ‘Tao follows nature. In Migoń P. & Kasprzak M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sandstone Landscapes (pp. 159-162). Wrocław Poland: University of Wrocław.

  • Redish J. C. (2000). What is information design? Technical Communication 47(2) 163-166.

  • Richmond V. P. & McCroskey J. C. (1995). Communication: Apprehension avoidance and effectiveness. Acottsdale USA: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

  • Schelhas J. (2011). The US national parks in international perspective: The Yellowstone model or conservation syncretism?. In Polisciano G. & Farina O. (Eds.) National Parks: Vegetation Wildlife and Threats (pp. 83-103). Hauppauge USA: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

  • Thirumaran K. Dam M. X. & Thirumaran C. M. (2013). Integrating Souvenirs with Tourism Development: Vietnam’s. Tourism Planning & Development September. DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2013.839471.

  • Ting Z. & Xun Z. (2004). Geoscientific significance and classification of National Geoparks of China. Acta Geologica Sinica‐English Edition 78(3) 854-865. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2004. tb00207.x.

  • Tubb K. N. (2003). An evaluation of the effectiveness of interpretation within Dartmoor National Park in reaching the goals of sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 11(6) 476-498. DOI: 10.1080/09669580308667217.

  • Westmyer S. A. et al. (1998). Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. Journal of communication 48(3) 27-48. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1460-2466.1998.tb02758.x.

  • Yan W. A. N. G. (2010). A Study on Tourism Interpretation System FORCOM of Geo-park. Journal of iuzhou Vocational & Technical College 10(1) 19-24.

  • Yang Q. J. & Fu H. L. (2011). The Evaluation of Interpretation System of Park from the National Geological Perspective of Tourists: Take the National Geological Park in Wulong as an Example. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science) 11(3) 69-73.

  • Yang G. et al. (2011). On the growth of national geoparks in China: Distribution interpretation and regional comparison. Episodes-Newsmagazine of the International Union of Geological Sciences 34(3) 157.

  • Zhang Y. (2008). Limiting factors for the Development of China’s Tourism Shopping and Countermeasures. International Journal of Business and Management 3(4) 127-131.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 708 281 19
PDF Downloads 501 258 22