E-government Policy and its Implementation in the Czech Republic: Selected Shortcomings

Open access

Abstract

The paper summarizes the specifics and challenges of e-government policy, and then discusses the apparent shortcomings of policy implementation and challenges for further development in the Czech Republic. It draws attention to problems in national e-government policy and in practical policy implementation (instability of governance, low quality of evaluation, low involvement of stakeholders in project design, and public procurement issues).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barassi V. & Treré E. (2012). Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice. New media & society 14(8) 1269-1285.

  • Breaking Barriers to eGovernment (2007). Solutions for eGovernment (Deliverable 3). Retrieved from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/egovbarriers/deliverables/solutions_report/Solutions_for_eGovernment.pdf.

  • Capgemini et al. (2010). Digitizing Public Services in Europe: Putting ambition into action. Retrieved from http://www.epractice.eu/files/Digitizing%20Public%20Services%20in%20Europe%20Putting%20ambition%20into%20action%20-%209th%20Benchmark%20Measurement%20-%20December%202010.pdf.

  • Chum J. (2013). Připadali jsme si skoro jako v Kocourkově [We thought like being in the Crazy Town](interview with the president of Association of secretaries of municipal offices). Veřejná správa 1 10-11.

  • Clift S. L. (2004). E-government and democracy: Representation and citizen engagement in the information age. Retrieved from http://www.publicus.net/articles/cliftegovdemocracy.pdf.

  • Česká televize (2013). Ani po roce registr vozidel nefunguje bezchybně [Even after one year the register of vehicles does not function properly].

  • Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (2012). Připomínky SP ČR ke Strategickému rámci rozvoje veřejné správy a e-governmentu 2014+ [Comments of the Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic to the Strategic framework of development of public administration and e-government for 2014+]. Retrieved from http://old.spcr.cz/en/statesment/pripominky-sp-cr-ke-strategickemu-ramci-rozvoje-verejne-spravy-a-egovernmentu-2014.

  • ČSÚ (2010). Informační společnost v číslech 2010 [Information society in numbers 2010]. Retrieved from http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/t/F20039D56A/$File/970510.pdf.

  • ČSÚ (2012). Informační společnost v číslech 2012 [Information society in numbers 2012]. Retrieved from http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/t/F20039D56A/$File/970510.pdf.

  • ČSÚ (2014). Informační společnost v číslech 2014 [Information society in numbers 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.czso.cz/csu/2014edicniplan.nsf/t/AD0026B96A/$File/061004-14.pdf.

  • eGov.cz (2012a). Časté personální obměny na vnitru mohou ohrozit čerpání eurodotací [Frequent personal changes at the Ministrz of the Interior may jeopardize the use of Eurosubsidies]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=344:aste-personalni-obmny-na-vnitru-mohou-ohroziterpani-eurodotaci-&catid=1:egovernment&Itemid=3.

  • eGov.cz. (2012c). eGovernment v roce 2011-5 miliard zadáno v tendrech s jediným uchazečem [eGovernment in 2011-5 milliard given to tenders with ounly one bidder]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=390:egovernment-v-roce-2011-5-miliard-zadano-v-tendrech-s-jedinym-uchazeem&catid=2:komentaraapostrehy&Itemid=4.

  • eGov.cz (2012d). Jak ovlivní nové organizační změny na vnitru další rozvoj eGovernmentu? [How will new organizational changes at the Ministry of the Interior change further eGovernment development]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=374:jak-ovlivni-nove-organizani-zmny-navnitru-dali-rozvoj-egovernmentu&catid=2:komentaraapostrehy&Itemid=4.

  • eGov.cz (2012e). ÚOHS šetří podivný tendr na zdravotní registry [Office for the Protection of Competition investigates a tender on health registers]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=405:uohs-eti-podivny-tendr-nazakladni-registry&catid=7:ostatni-ejustice-el-podpis&Itemid=3.

  • eStát.cz (2008). Smart Administration - reforma nebo jen pozlátko pro evropské úředníky? [Smart Administration - reform or a mere glitz for European civil servants?]. Retrieved from http://www.estat.cz/smart-administration-reforma-nebo-jen-pozlatko-proevropske-uredniky2.html.

  • European Commission (2010a). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • European Commission (2010b). The European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/egovernment/action_plan_2011_2015/docs/action_plan_en_act_part1_v2.pdf.

  • Garson G. D. (2006). Public information technology and e-governance: Managing the virtual state. Carlow: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Gilbert D. Balestrini P. & Littleboy D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17(4) 286-301.

  • Hansen M. B. Steen T. & de Jong M. (2013). New Public Management Public Service Bargains and the challenges of interdepartmental coordination: a comparative analysis of top civil servants in state administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(1) 29-48.

  • Heeks R. (2005). Implementing and managing eGovernment: an international text. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Hesse J. J. (1998). Rebuilding the state: Administrative reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Preparing Public Administration for the European Administrative Space Sigma Papers (23) 168-79.

  • Homburg V. (2008). Understanding e-government: Information systems in public administration. New York: Routledge.

  • Chen Y. C. (2010). Citizen-centric e-government services: Understanding integrated citizen service information systems. Social Science Computer Review 28(4) 427-442.

  • Křížová L. (2013). Státní orgány by měly zákony vykládat jasně [State authorities should interprete law clearly] (interview with the President of Union of Towns and Municipalities of the Czech Republic). Veřejná správa 1 6-8.

  • Lips M. & Barlow L. (2015). Reconceptualising Evidence-Based Policy in the Age of Big Data: Implications for Public Policy Practice and Scholarship. Paper for IRSPM Panel G107 ‘Managing the digital future of the public sector: transforming public management through e-Government’?.

  • Makolm J. (2006 January). A holistic reference framework for e-Government: the practical proof of a scientific concept. In System Sciences 2006. HICSS’06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 4 pp. 77a−77a). IEEE.

  • Nguyen T. Q. Teicher J. Van Gramberg B. & Tran H. (2014). Non-technical barriers in e-government implementation: the case of e-Customs in Vietnam. IRSPM 2014 onference.

  • NKÚ. (2015). Informace z kontrolní akce NKÚ č. 14/20: Peněžní prostředky státu vynakládané na výstavbu provoz a využívání služeb datových center [Information on control activities of the Supreme Audit Office - Money invested in establishment maintenance and use of data centers services]. Retrieved from: http://www.nku.cz/assets/media/informace-14-20.pdf.

  • OECD (2003). e-Government Studies - The e-Government Imperative. Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (2009). Rethinking e-Government Services: User-Centred Approach. Paris: OECD.

  • Pina V. Torres L. & Royo S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments?. International Public Management Journal 13(4) 350-380.

  • Peterka J. (2011). Portálová rošáda [Portal castling]. Retrieved from http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/portalova-rosada.

  • Peterka J. (2012). Základní registry prý budou v termínu [Basic registers are to function in time]]. Retrieved from http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/zakladni-registry-pry-budou-vterminu.

  • Siau K. & Long Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models-a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105(4) 443-458.

  • Smejkal V. (2003). Informační systémy veřejné správy ČR [Information systems of public administration in the Czech Republic]. Praha: VŠE.

  • Smejkal V. (2011). Aktuální problémy elektronické komunikace v ČR [Current problems of electronic communication in the Czech Republic]. Konference Datové schránky - rok druhý. Retrieved from http://www.dataschranky.cz/2011/download/prezentace/smejkal.pdf.

  • Šimoník P. Pojer P. & Svoboda J. (2009). Pilíře projektů eGovernment očima občana - zákazníka veřejné správy [Pillars of eGovernment project in the eyes of a citizen - a customer of public administration]. ISSS 2009 249-253.

  • Špaček D. (2012a). eGovernment: cíle trendy a přístupy k jeho hodnocení [eGovernment: goals trends and approaches to evaluation]. Praha: C. H. Beck.

  • Špaček D. (2012b). Information Strategies of Czech Statutory Cities and Regions: Critical Remarks. Knowledge Management: An International Journal 3 31-46.

  • Špaček D. National approach to e-government evaluation - Challenges of accountable (e)government in the Czech Republic. Modern Approaches Metrics and Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating Public Policies. 265-300.

  • Špaček D. (2014). Coordination of and through E-Government: The Case of the Czech Republic. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy VII(1) 83-107.

  • Tinholt D. et al. (2014a). Delivering the European Advantage? (Background Report). Retrieved from http://www.capgemini.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/background_report_20-05_final_for_ec_0.pdf.

  • Tinholt D. et al. (2014b). Delivering the European Advantage? (Insight Report). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=5811.

  • Veselý A. (2013). Accountability in Central and Eastern Europe: concept and reality. International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(2) 310-330.

  • Veřejná správa (2011). Elektronický kabát pro občanské průkazy [Electronic coat for IDs]. Veřejná správa 22 10-11.

  • Willcocks L. & Lester S. (1996). Beyond the IT productivity paradox. European Management Journal 14(3) 279-290.

  • Wong W. & Welch E. (2004). Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability. Governance 17(2) 275-297.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.156
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.430

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 462 312 4
PDF Downloads 251 179 5