Open Access

E-government Policy and its Implementation in the Czech Republic: Selected Shortcomings

   | Feb 16, 2016

Cite

Barassi, V., & Treré, E. (2012). Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice. New media & society, 14(8), 1269-1285.Search in Google Scholar

Breaking Barriers to eGovernment (2007). Solutions for eGovernment (Deliverable 3). Retrieved from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/egovbarriers/deliverables/solutions_report/Solutions_for_eGovernment.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Capgemini et al. (2010). Digitizing Public Services in Europe: Putting ambition into action. Retrieved from http://www.epractice.eu/files/Digitizing%20Public%20Services%20in%20Europe%20Putting%20ambition%20into%20action%20-%209th%20Benchmark%20Measurement%20-%20December%202010.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Chum, J. (2013). Připadali jsme si skoro jako v Kocourkově [We thought like being in the Crazy Town](interview with the president of Association of secretaries of municipal offices). Veřejná správa, 1, 10-11.Search in Google Scholar

Clift, S. L. (2004). E-government and democracy: Representation and citizen engagement in the information age. Retrieved from http://www.publicus.net/articles/cliftegovdemocracy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Česká televize (2013). Ani po roce registr vozidel nefunguje bezchybně [Even after one year the register of vehicles does not function properly].Search in Google Scholar

Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (2012). Připomínky SP ČR ke Strategickému rámci rozvoje veřejné správy a e-governmentu 2014+ [Comments of the Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic to the Strategic framework of development of public administration and e-government for 2014+]. Retrieved from http://old.spcr.cz/en/statesment/pripominky-sp-cr-ke-strategickemu-ramci-rozvoje-verejne-spravy-a-egovernmentu-2014.Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ (2010). Informační společnost v číslech 2010 [Information society in numbers 2010]. Retrieved from http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/t/F20039D56A/$File/970510.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ (2012). Informační společnost v číslech 2012 [Information society in numbers 2012]. Retrieved from http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/t/F20039D56A/$File/970510.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ (2014). Informační společnost v číslech 2014 [Information society in numbers 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.czso.cz/csu/2014edicniplan.nsf/t/AD0026B96A/$File/061004-14.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

eGov.cz (2012a). Časté personální obměny na vnitru mohou ohrozit čerpání eurodotací [Frequent personal changes at the Ministrz of the Interior may jeopardize the use of Eurosubsidies]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=344:aste-personalni-obmny-na-vnitru-mohou-ohroziterpani-eurodotaci-&catid=1:egovernment&Itemid=3. Search in Google Scholar

eGov.cz. (2012c). eGovernment v roce 2011-5 miliard zadáno v tendrech s jediným uchazečem [eGovernment in 2011-5 milliard given to tenders with ounly one bidder]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=390:egovernment-v-roce-2011-5-miliard-zadano-v-tendrech-s-jedinym-uchazeem&catid=2:komentaraapostrehy&Itemid=4. Search in Google Scholar

eGov.cz (2012d). Jak ovlivní nové organizační změny na vnitru další rozvoj eGovernmentu? [How will new organizational changes at the Ministry of the Interior change further eGovernment development]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=374:jak-ovlivni-nove-organizani-zmny-navnitru-dali-rozvoj-egovernmentu&catid=2:komentaraapostrehy&Itemid=4. Search in Google Scholar

eGov.cz (2012e). ÚOHS šetří podivný tendr na zdravotní registry [Office for the Protection of Competition investigates a tender on health registers]. Retrieved from http://www.egov.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=405:uohs-eti-podivny-tendr-nazakladni-registry&catid=7:ostatni-ejustice-el-podpis&Itemid=3. Search in Google Scholar

eStát.cz (2008). Smart Administration - reforma nebo jen pozlátko pro evropské úředníky? [Smart Administration - reform or a mere glitz for European civil servants?]. Retrieved from http://www.estat.cz/smart-administration-reforma-nebo-jen-pozlatko-proevropske-uredniky2.html.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2010a). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2010b). The European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/egovernment/action_plan_2011_2015/docs/action_plan_en_act_part1_v2.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Garson, G. D. (2006). Public information technology and e-governance: Managing the virtual state. Carlow: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286-301.10.1108/09513550410539794Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, M. B., Steen, T., & de Jong, M. (2013). New Public Management, Public Service Bargains and the challenges of interdepartmental coordination: a comparative analysis of top civil servants in state administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(1), 29-48.10.1177/0020852312467550Search in Google Scholar

Heeks, R. (2005). Implementing and managing eGovernment: an international text. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

Hesse, J. J. (1998). Rebuilding the state: Administrative reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Preparing Public Administration for the European Administrative Space, Sigma Papers, (23), 168-79.Search in Google Scholar

Homburg, V. (2008). Understanding e-government: Information systems in public administration. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203885642Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Y. C. (2010). Citizen-centric e-government services: Understanding integrated citizen service information systems. Social Science Computer Review, 28(4), 427-442.10.1177/0894439309359050Search in Google Scholar

Křížová, L. (2013). Státní orgány by měly zákony vykládat jasně [State authorities should interprete law clearly] (interview with the President of Union of Towns and Municipalities of the Czech Republic). Veřejná správa, 1, 6-8.Search in Google Scholar

Lips, M., & Barlow, L. (2015). Reconceptualising Evidence-Based Policy in the Age of Big Data: Implications for Public Policy Practice and Scholarship. Paper for IRSPM Panel G107 ‘Managing the digital future of the public sector: transforming public management through e-Government’?.Search in Google Scholar

Makolm, J. (2006, January). A holistic reference framework for e-Government: the practical proof of a scientific concept. In System Sciences, 2006. HICSS’06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 77a−77a). IEEE.10.1109/HICSS.2006.13Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. Q., Teicher, J., Van Gramberg, B., & Tran, H. (2014). Non-technical barriers in e-government implementation: the case of e-Customs in Vietnam. IRSPM 2014 onference.Search in Google Scholar

NKÚ. (2015). Informace z kontrolní akce NKÚ č. 14/20: Peněžní prostředky státu vynakládané na výstavbu, provoz a využívání služeb datových center [Information on control activities of the Supreme Audit Office - Money invested in establishment, maintenance and use of data centers services]. Retrieved from: http://www.nku.cz/assets/media/informace-14-20.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2003). e-Government Studies - The e-Government Imperative. Paris: OECD.10.1787/9789264101197-enSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2009). Rethinking e-Government Services: User-Centred Approach. Paris: OECD.10.1787/9789264059412-enSearch in Google Scholar

Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments?. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 350-380.10.1080/10967494.2010.524834Search in Google Scholar

Peterka, J. (2011). Portálová rošáda [Portal castling]. Retrieved from http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/portalova-rosada.Search in Google Scholar

Peterka, J. (2012). Základní registry prý budou v termínu [Basic registers are to function in time]]. Retrieved from http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/zakladni-registry-pry-budou-vterminu.Search in Google Scholar

Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models-a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443-458.10.1108/02635570510592352Search in Google Scholar

Smejkal, V. (2003). Informační systémy veřejné správy ČR [Information systems of public administration in the Czech Republic]. Praha: VŠE.Search in Google Scholar

Smejkal, V. (2011). Aktuální problémy elektronické komunikace v ČR [Current problems of electronic communication in the Czech Republic]. Konference Datové schránky - rok druhý. Retrieved from http://www.dataschranky.cz/2011/download/prezentace/smejkal.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Šimoník, P., Pojer, P., & Svoboda, J. (2009). Pilíře projektů eGovernment očima občana - zákazníka veřejné správy [Pillars of eGovernment project in the eyes of a citizen - a customer of public administration]. ISSS 2009, 249-253.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. (2012a). eGovernment: cíle, trendy a přístupy k jeho hodnocení [eGovernment: goals, trends and approaches to evaluation]. Praha: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. (2012b). Information Strategies of Czech Statutory Cities and Regions: Critical Remarks. Knowledge Management: An International Journal, 3, 31-46.10.18848/2327-7998/CGP/v12i03/50801Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. National approach to e-government evaluation - Challenges of accountable (e)government in the Czech Republic. Modern Approaches, Metrics and Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating Public Policies. 265-300.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. (2014). Coordination of and through E-Government: The Case of the Czech Republic. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, VII(1), 83-107.10.2478/nispa-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Tinholt, D. et al. (2014a). Delivering the European Advantage? (Background Report). Retrieved from http://www.capgemini.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/background_report_20-05_final_for_ec_0.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Tinholt, D. et al. (2014b). Delivering the European Advantage? (Insight Report). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=5811.Search in Google Scholar

Veselý, A. (2013). Accountability in Central and Eastern Europe: concept and reality. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 310-330.10.1177/0020852313477762Search in Google Scholar

Veřejná správa (2011). Elektronický kabát pro občanské průkazy [Electronic coat for IDs]. Veřejná správa, 22, 10-11.Search in Google Scholar

Willcocks, L., & Lester, S. (1996). Beyond the IT productivity paradox. European Management Journal, 14(3), 279-290.10.1016/0263-2373(96)00007-2Search in Google Scholar

Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability. Governance, 17(2), 275-297. 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00246.xSearch in Google Scholar