A Study of Food Enterprises’ Awareness and Behaviors for Social Responsibility

Open access

Abstract

This study is undertaken to evaluate and promote the Chinese food enterprises’ awareness and behaviors for social responsibility. In the survey, the researcher releases 500 copies of questionnaire to the senior managers in Chinese food enterprises. After excluding invalid respondents, the researcher gets 376 valid copies. Then the researcher conducts a descriptive statistical and factor analysis to the copies of questionnaire. The result shows that: firstly, Chinese food enterprises’ awareness of social responsibility is relatively poor; secondly, the majority of food enterprises fulfill their social responsibility passively. Based on the above conclusions, this paper proposes four paths to promote Chinese food enterprises to fulfill social responsibility better, i.e. establish the belief in social responsibility, expand the intensification of food business, make best use of the industrial association and strengthen the government supervision and regulation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. André R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics 110(1) 133-150. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1.

  • 2. Bihari C. S. & Pradhan S. (2011). CSR and performance: the story of banks in India. Journal of Transnational Management 16(1) 20-35. DOI:10.1080/15475778.2011.549807.

  • 3. Bice S. (2015). Bridging corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 33(2) 160-166. DOI:10.1080/14615517.2014.983710.

  • 4. Donaldson T. & Preston L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(20) 65-91. DOI: 10.3138/9781442673496-011.

  • 5. Helm B. W. (2012). Accountability and some social dimensions of human agency. Philosophical Issues 22(1) 217-232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00226.x.

  • 6. Lopez B. & Fornes G. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: case studies of Spanish MNCs in Latin America. European Business Review. 27(2) 214-230. DOI:10.1108/EBR-03-2013-0053.

  • 7. Merrick E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Business Review 45(7) 1147-1148. DOI: 10.2307/1331697.

  • 8. Park B. I. Ghauri P. N. Sul W. & Choi S. B. (2015). Symposium: emerging markets international business and corporate social responsibility. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 51(2) 291-292. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594.

  • 9. Patten D. M. Ren Y. & Zhao N. (2015). Standalone corporate social responsibility reporting in China: an exploratory analysis of its relation to legitimation. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal. 35 (1) 17-31. DOI:10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594.

  • 10. Peters G. F. & Romi A. M. (2014). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 125(4) 637-666. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1886-9.

  • 11. Porter M. E. Kramer M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12) 78-92. DOI: 10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006.

  • 12. Peters S. Miller M. & Kusyk S. (2011). How relevant is corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in emerging markets? Corporate Governance 11(4) 429–445. DOI:/10.1108/14720701111159262.

  • 13. Ramasastry A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility versus business and human rights: bridging the gap between responsibility and accountability. Journal of Human Rights. 14(2) 237-259. DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953.

  • 14. Shin H. D. Lee N. R. & Ji H. P. (2015). Differential effects of strong corporate governance on both professional and voluntary corporate social responsibility activities of the firm. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 51(sup4) S2-S10. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2014.1013860.

  • 15. Sheldon O. (1924). The Philosophy of Management. London: Sir Isaac Pit-man and Sons Ltd.

  • 16. Sundarasen S. D. D. Tan J. Y. & Rajangam N. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance 16(1) 35-53. DOI: 10.1108/CG-05-2015-0059.

  • 17. Young R. (2004). Dilemmas and advances in corporate social responsibility in Brazil. The work of the Ethos Institute. Natural Resources Forum 28(4) 291–301. DOI:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00102.x.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 300 110 5
PDF Downloads 125 60 5