Open Access

A Study of Food Enterprises’ Awareness and Behaviors for Social Responsibility

   | Dec 28, 2016

Cite

1. André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 133-150. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1.10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Bihari, C. S. & Pradhan, S. (2011). CSR and performance: the story of banks in India. Journal of Transnational Management, 16(1), 20-35. DOI:10.1080/15475778.2011.549807.10.1080/15475778.2011.549807Search in Google Scholar

3. Bice, S. (2015). Bridging corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(2), 160-166. DOI:10.1080/14615517.2014.983710.10.1080/14615517.2014.983710Search in Google Scholar

4. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(20), 65-91. DOI: 10.3138/9781442673496-011.10.3138/9781442673496-011Search in Google Scholar

5. Helm, B. W. (2012). Accountability and some social dimensions of human agency. Philosophical Issues, 22(1), 217-232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00226.x.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00226.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Lopez, B. & Fornes, G. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: case studies of Spanish MNCs in Latin America. European Business Review. 27(2), 214-230. DOI:10.1108/EBR-03-2013-0053.10.1108/EBR-03-2013-0053Search in Google Scholar

7. Merrick, E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Business Review, 45(7), 1147-1148. DOI: 10.2307/1331697.10.2307/1331697Search in Google Scholar

8. Park, B. I., Ghauri, P. N., Sul, W., & Choi, S. B. (2015). Symposium: emerging markets, international business, and corporate social responsibility. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51(2), 291-292. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594.10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594Search in Google Scholar

9. Patten, D. M., Ren, Y. & Zhao, N. (2015). Standalone corporate social responsibility reporting in China: an exploratory analysis of its relation to legitimation. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal. 35 (1), 17-31. DOI:10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594.10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594Search in Google Scholar

10. Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2014). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 637-666. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1886-9.10.1007/s10551-013-1886-9Search in Google Scholar

11. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. DOI: 10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006.10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006Search in Google Scholar

12. Peters, S. Miller, M., & Kusyk, S. (2011). How relevant is corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in emerging markets? Corporate Governance, 11(4), 429–445. DOI:/10.1108/14720701111159262.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility versus business and human rights: bridging the gap between responsibility and accountability. Journal of Human Rights. 14(2), 237-259. DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953.10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953Search in Google Scholar

14. Shin, H. D., Lee, N. R., & Ji, H. P. (2015). Differential effects of strong corporate governance on both professional and voluntary corporate social responsibility activities of the firm. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51(sup4), S2-S10. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2014.1013860.10.1080/1540496X.2014.1013860Search in Google Scholar

15. Sheldon, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Management. London: Sir Isaac Pit-man and Sons Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

16. Sundarasen, S. D. D., Tan, J. Y., & Rajangam, N. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance, 16(1), 35-53. DOI: 10.1108/CG-05-2015-0059.10.1108/CG-05-2015-0059Search in Google Scholar

17. Young, R. (2004). Dilemmas and advances in corporate social responsibility in Brazil. The work of the Ethos Institute. Natural Resources Forum, 28(4), 291–301. DOI:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00102.x.10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00102.xSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2344-150X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Industrial Chemistry, other, Food Science and Technology