Personalized E-Learning: Relation Between Felder– Silverman Model and Academic Performance

Open access


The growing demands for the training of students and the need for continuous improvement of the quality of university education make it necessary to find and apply more effective educational technologies and practices based on the correlation of teaching with the student’s profile and his/her individual Learning Style. This article discusses the topic of relevance of personalized e-learning. It describes Learning Styles and looks at the Felder– Silverman model in more detail. The article contains the results of student surveys on the basis of which the interrelation between the Index of Learning Styles and academic performance is analysed. The relation between performance and learning styles according to the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model is shown: in some specialties, students with sequential learning style have higher academic performance than students with global learning style, as well as students with mild learning style preferences on the Activist/Reflector dimension.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] S. Vdovina “Personalized Education: Problems and Prospects” CredeExperto: transport society education language vol. 1 no. 3 pp. 186–191 March 2015.

  • [2] W. Apple and H. Horace “Personalized Education: An Exploratory Study of Learning Pedagogies in Relation to Personalization Technologies” International Conference on Web-Based Learning ICWL pp. 407–415 2004.

  • [3] O. Bourkoukou E. Bachari and M. Adnani “A Personalized E-learning Based on Recommender System” International Journal of Learning and Teaching vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 99–103 2016.

  • [4] F. Essalmi L. Ayed M. Jemni D. Kinshuk and S. Graf “A fully personalization strategy of E-learning scenarios” Computers in Human Behavior vol. 26 no. 4 pp. 581–591 2010.

  • [5] P. Grant and D. Basye Personalized learning: A Guide for Engaging Students with Technology Oregon DC: ISTE 2014 p. 192.

  • [6] B. Moeller and T. Reitzes. Integrating Technology with Student-Centered Learning. Quincy MA: Nellie Mae Education Foundation 2011. Available from: [Accessed March 1 2019].

  • [7] J. W. Keefe Learning style: An overview. NASSP’s Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston VA: National Association of Secondary School Principles 1979 pp. 1–17.

  • [8] K. L. Stewart and L.A. Felicetti “Learning styles of marketing majors” Educational Research Quarterly vol. 15 no. 2 pp. 15–23 1992.

  • [9] D. A. Kolb Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: New Jersey-Hall 1984.

  • [10] R. Felder and L. Silverman “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education” Engineering Education vol. 78 pp. 674–684 1988.

  • [11] C. Soles and L. Moller “Myers Briggs Type Preferences in Distance Learning Education” International Journal of Educational Technology vol. 2 pp. 180–187 2001.

  • [12] P. Honey and A. Mumford Manual of Learning Styles. London: Peter Honey Publications 1982.

  • [13] V. I. Toktarova “Adaptive System of Mathematical Training of the University Students: Accounting of Style Typologies” Journal of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University no. 6 pp. 108–116 2017.

  • [14] H. M. Truong “Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments problems and opportunities” Computers in Human Behavior vol. 55 part B pp. 1185–1193 2016.

  • [15] L. Joseph and S. Abraham “Instructional design for learning path identification in an e-learning environment using Felder–Silverman learning styles model” 2017 International Conference on Networks & Advances in Computational Technologies (NetACT) Thiruvanthapuram 2017 pp. 215–220.

  • [16] M. Rani R. Nayak and O. P. Vyas “An ontology-based adaptive personalized e-learning system assisted by software agents on cloud storage” Knowledge-Based Systems vol. 90 p. 33–48 2015.

  • [17] M. M. El-Bishouty et al. “Use of Felder and Silverman learning style model for online course design” Educational Technology Research and Development vol. 67 no. 1 pp. 161–177 2019.

  • [18] N. Prokofyeva M. Uhanova O. Zavjalova and V. Boltunova “The Impact of Feedback on the Structuring Process of Study Courses” Joint Proceedings of the BIR 2018 Short Papers Workshops and Doctoral Consortium co-located with 17th International Conference Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2018) September 24–26 2018 Stockholm Sweden.

  • [19] B. A. Soloman and R. M. Felder “Index of learning styles questionnaire” NC State University 2005. [Online]. Available: [Accessed March 1 2019].

  • [20] A. M. Grjibovsky “Analysis of Three or More Independent Groups of Quantitative Data” Human ecology no. 3 pp. 50–58 2008.

  • [21] L. D. Brown T. T. Cai and A. DasGupta “Interval estimation for a binomial proportion” Statistical science vol. 16 no. 2 2001 pp. 101–133.

  • [22] R. M. Felder and J. Spurlin “Applications reliability and validity of the index of learning styles” International Journal of Engineering Education vol. 21 no. 1 pp.103–112 2005.

  • [23] A. S. Gibbons J. Nelson and R. Richards “The instructional use of learning objects” The nature and origin of instructional objects. D. Wiley Ed. Bloomington Indiana: AIT/AECT 2000 pp. 25–58.

  • [24] D. Rovinskyi and K. Synytsya “Distance courses quality: A learner’s view” Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies Joensuu Finland 2004 pp. 1080–1081.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 401 401 23
PDF Downloads 381 381 50