<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">After massive proliferation over the last decade, distribution modelling (DM) – research with
the purpose of modelling the distribution of observable objects of a specific type – has grown
into an independent branch of ecological science. There is consensus that this new discipline
needs a stronger theoretical foundation. I describe DM as an inductive scientific process with
12 steps, organised into three composite steps: ecological model, data model, and statistical
model. Step 8, modelling of the overall ecological response, places DM unambiguously among
gradient analysis techniques and motivates for a gradient analytic (GA) perspective on DM. DM
terminology is reviewed and revised accordingly.
Three fundamental insights of the GA perspective are described: (1) that external ‘factors’
do not influence the species one by one, but act on the species in concert; (2) that a few major
complex-gradients normally account for most of the variation in species composition that can
be explained environmentally; and (3) that species occur within a restricted interval along
each major complex-gradient. These insights are developed into a theoretical platform for DM.
General patterns of species performance variation along environmental complex-gradients and
the structuring processes responsible for these patterns are reviewed. Three categories of ecoclines,
i.e., gradients of variation in species composition and the environment, are recognised:
regional ecoclines, local ecoclines, and condition or impact ecoclines. Causes and implications
of the unimodal shape of species’ responses to environmental complex-gradients are reviewed.
Structuring processes are divided into three categories: limited physiological tolerance, interspecific
interactions, and demographic processes. Relationships between categories of ecoclines,
the processes responsible for variation in species performance along them, and the spatial and
temporal scale intervals in which variation is large, are reviewed.
The GA perspective forms the basis for discussions of important steps in the DM process.
Initially, the controversial concepts of the habitat and the niche are reviewed and their role in
the ecological model (Step 1) discussed. I conclude that neither of these concepts are necessary,
nor useful, for DM. As an alternative to conceptual models based upon the niche concept, I
propose a new conceptual modelling framework for DM, the HED framework, which is rooted in
the gradient analytic perspective. I show how this new framework can be used, in initial phases
of a DM study to formulate a meta-model for factors that influence distributions, and in the
analytic phase to guide important choices of methods and options and to assist interpretation
of modelling results. Important data model issues are: collection of data for the modelled target
and preparation of raw response variables (Steps 2 and 6); collection of explanatory data (Step 3); conceptualisation of the study area (Step 4); collection of data for calibration and evaluation
(Step 9); and transformation of explanatory variables to derived variables subjected to DM (Step
5,ii). Important statistical model issues are: statistical model formulation, i.e. choice of method
(Step 7,i) and model specification (Step 7,ii); model selection and internal assessment of model
performance (Steps 8,i and 8,ii); and model evaluation (Step 10). Two points are emphasised:
(1) that modelling purpose should inform choice of methods and options; and (2) the importance
of an independently collected presence/absence data set, which can be used to calibrate,
evaluate and iteratively improve models.
Finally I list seven challenges of particular importance for progress in DM: (1) that more
knowledge of patterns of natural variation is needed; (2) that a better mechanistic understanding
of causes of patterns of natural variation is needed; (3) that the availability of relevant rasterised
explanatory variables needs to be improved; (4) that more studies of patterns at local
and micro spatial scales, in addition to multiple-scale studies using DM methods, are needed;
(5) that evaluation by independent data should be established as a standard in DM; (6) that
further insights into statistical modelling methods and their options, with particular reference
to appropriateness for different types of data and DM purposes, are needed; and (7) that DM
methods should be incorporated in studies with a broader scope. I conclude that there are
considerable potentials for improvement of DM methods and practice. Increased return from
DM in terms of contributions that improve our understanding of patterns of natural variation
and their causes, should be expected.</abstract>

A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 40 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022)

Volume 39 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Volume 38 (2018): Issue 1 (October 2018)

Volume 37 (2014): Issue 1 (April 2014) Multiple parallel ordinations: the importance of choice of ordination method and weighting of species abundance data, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 36 (2013): Issue 1 (April 2013) A strict maximum likelihood explanation of MaxEnt, and some implications for distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 35 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012) A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 34 (2010): Issue 1 (April 2010) Vegetation composition, gradients and environment relationships of birch forest in six reference areas in Norway,
Editor: R. H. Økland

Volume 33 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009) The lichen flora of Svalbard, Editor: R. H. Økland

Volume 32 (2008): Issue 1 (November 2008) Gradients analyses of forests ground vegetation and its relationships to environmental variables in five subtropical forest areas, S and SW China,
Editors: K. Høiland and R. H. Økland

Volume 31 (2008): Issue 1 (February 2008) Arctic and alpine mycology VII, Editors: K. Høiland and R. H. Økland

Volume 29 (2001): Issue 1 (January 2001)

Volume 28 (2000): Issue 1 (January 2000)

Volume 27 (1999): Issue 1 (January 1999)

Volume 26 (1999): Issue 1 (January 1999)

Volume 25 (1998): Issue 1 (December 1998)

Volume 24 (1997): Issue 1 (December 1997)

Volume 23 (1996): Issue 1 (June 1996)

Volume 22 (1996): Issue 1 (May 1996)

Volume 21 (1994): Issue 1 (May 1994)

Volume 20 (1993): Issue 1 (November 1993)

Volume 19 (1993): Issue 1 (November 1993)

Volume 18 (1993): Issue 1 (September 1993)

Volume 17 (1993): Issue 1 (May 1993)

Volume 16 (1993): Issue 1 (March 1993)

Volume 15 (1993): Issue 1 (March 1993)

Volume 14 (1992): Issue 1 (May 1992)

Volume 13 (1992): Issue 1 (February 1992)

Volume 12 (1991): Issue 1 (June 1991)

Volume 11 (1990): Issue 1 (December 1990)

Volume 10 (1990): Issue 1 (June 1990)

Volume 9 (1989): Issue 1 (October 1989)

Volume 8 (1989): Issue 1 (October 1989)

Volume 7 (1988): Issue 1 (March 1988)

Volume 6 (1987): Issue 1 (June 1987)

Volume 6 (1995): Issue s6 (January 1995) Supplement 6

Volume 5 (2004): Issue s5 (January 2004) Supplement 5

Volume 5 (1987): Issue 1 (May 1987)

Volume 4 (1986): Issue 1 (December 1986)

Volume 4 (1992): Issue s4 (January 1992) Supplement 4

Volume 3 (1986): Issue 1 (February 1986)

Volume 3 (1991): Issue s3 (January 1991) Supplement 3

Volume 2 (1990): Issue s2 (January 1990) Supplement 2

Volume 2 (1985): Issue 1 (November 1985)

Volume 1 (1985): Issue 1 (January 1985)

Volume 1 (1990): Issue s1 (January 1990) Supplement 1

Sommerfeltia

 Contains monographs in plant taxonomy, phytogeography, plant ecology, plant morphology, evolutionary botany. Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Volume 35 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012) - A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 35 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012)

Sommerfeltia

Volume 35 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012)

A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling

Wyszukiwanie

Wszystkie tomy i zeszyty w tym czasopiśmie