<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Fungal rhinosinusitis is an important pathological entity, a highly controversial topic in the medical world today, by the various research directions it offers. In order to be able to predict a patient’s prognosis and his response to treatment, first we must have a classification of fungal rhinosinusitis. The authors considered it is important to make a distinction between invasive and noninvasive forms of fungal rhinosinusitis. The most important step in the management of fungal rhinosinusitis is to have a correct diagnosis, based on strong criteria, which will lead to a better prognosis of this disease. Because of its invasiveness potential, especially in patients at risk, it is essential to have a correct and fast diagnosis in case of fungal rhinosinusitis, in order to begin the treatment as fast as possible, for a favourable prognosis. The only way to establish diagnosis in a reliable way is to make a detailed clinical examination and to take biopsy samples.</abstract>

“Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

ENT&HNS Department, “Sfanta Maria” Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

Difficulties in the diagnosis of fungal rhinosinusitis – Literature review

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Polcalcins are highly cross-reactive calcium-binding allergen components specifically expressed in pollen from trees, grasses and weeds. The grass allergen component rPhl p 7, a recombinant non-glycosylated calcium-binding protein of 2-EF-hand type, is the most cross-reactive polcalcin and may be used as a polcalcin biomarker of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Polcalcin sensitization, which appears to be linked to geographical factors, level and time of pollen exposure, has to be assessed in allergic rhinitis patients with multiple pollen sensitizations and may be useful for a better targeted prescription of allergen immunotherapy.</abstract>

Polcalcins as pollen panallergens in allergic rhinitis

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">BACKGROUND. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is known to be the ideal treatment for saccal and postsaccal stenosis of the lacrimal apparatus. Following this surgery, an important inconvenient would be the stenosis of the created ostium with consecutive epiphora.MATERIAL AND METHODS. 20 patients with chronic unilateral lacrimal duct obstruction were operated in “Prof. Dr. D. Hociota” Institute of Phono-Audiology and Functional ENT Surgery, Department I, between January 2015 and July 2015. After creating the dacryocystorhinostoma, a stent was inserted transnasally to the bottom edge of the lacrimal sac and positioned to the bony margin of the ostium. Stents used varied in size from 1 to 3 mm in diameter. We followed-up our patients at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6 months, assessing the symptoms of the lacrimal apparatus, especially the epiphora.RESULTS. The mean age of patients varied between 31 and 65. Most of our patients were women (n=14). In a total number of 16 patients epiphora disappeared, it decreased in 2 patients, and persisted in 2 patients. There were two patients with no changes who have spontaneously eliminated the stent 2 or 3 days after the surgery. The most widely used stent size was 3 mm diameter, with a success rate of 90%. CONCLUSION. The endoscopic approach may be an effective procedure in patients with pathologies of the lacrimal apparatus. In order to achieve an efficient result, both a preoperative rigorous preparation and also postoperative medical care are necessary. In conclusion, ostium stenting represents a better way to ensure a longer period of maintaining the permeability of the lacrimal apparatus.</abstract>

“Prof. Dr. Dorin Hociota” Institute of Phono-Audiology and Functional ENT Surgery, Bucharest, Romania

Department of Morphology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

Stent technique for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy – Our expertise

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">BACKGROUND. Nowadays, snoring and obstructive sleep apnea are the most common sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD) found in the medical practice and they are estimated to affect approximately 4% of men and 2% of women in the middle-aged workforce. There are some ENT pathologies that are involved in snoring, and also in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The nose plays an important part in both breathing and SRBD. The aim of this study was to determine the role of posterior rhinomanometry in the diagnoses of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We present a retrospective observational study that took place during a three-year period, between 2009 and 2012. In this study were included 110 subjects, who have undergone polysomnographic investigations, as well as an ENT clinical examination focused on endoscopy and posterior rhinomanometry evaluation. RESULTS. The mean age was 46.09 ± 10.91 years, the mean height was 177.58 ± 10.02 cm and the mean weight was 98.45 ± 17.74 kg. Analysing these results, we found a significant correlation between them and the severity of the sleep pathology. The posterior rhinomanometry results were correlated with nasal allergic rhinitis (p = 0.06) and not correlated with other nasal pathology, such as nasal septum deviation. The changes in the size and shape of the tongue base or epiglottis proved to have an important impact upon rhinomanometric values, with a statistically significant value (p = 0.03, respectively p = 0.08). CONCLUSION. All diagnostic methods must be interpreted in connection with each other.</abstract>

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mures County Emergency Hospital, Tirgu Mures, Romania

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tirgu Mures University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania

The value of posterior rhinomanometry in evaluating patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">BACKGROUND. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a reliable option in the treatment of sinus pathology, but the presence of the anatomical variant and difficult cases like massive polyposis or revision FESS can generate some problems to surgeons. MATERIAL AND METHODS. After performing an unciformectomy, a partial anterior ethmoidectomy and maxillary ostium antrostomy, we slide a cottonoid back to the basal lamella of the middle turbinate with a Cottle dissector and introduce it in the superior meatus. After that, we return to the middle meatus and proceed to open the basal lamella finding the cottonoid placed there previously.RESULTS. An easy technique, safe and reproducible, that allows us to advance in our dissection, avoiding damaging important structures.CONCLUSION. In this paper we present a safe way to approach the posterior ethmoidal cells complex in the classic way through the basal lamella of the middle turbinate, under the guidance of a cottonoid, a safe and easy maneuver to do this procedure in the beginning of our formation or in complex cases.</abstract>

A safe way to find the posterior ethmoidal cells: navigation with cottonoid

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">BACKGROUND. Silent sinus syndrome (SSS) is known as a relatively new pathology with clinical characterizations, represented by the facial asymmetry determined by progressive enophthalmos and hypoglobus and the absence of nasal symptoms. The theory that sustained this pathology is based on the negative maxillary pressure and the chronic evolution of symptomatology.CASE REPORT. A 49-year-old white female presented in our clinic for facial asymmetry, right facial pressure, right depression of the orbital floor and hypoglobus, without diplopia. The CT scan showed an opaque right maxillary sinus with the depression of the orbital floor. CONCLUSION. The pathogenesis, clinical and imagistic features are the most important in the SSS for diagnosis and correct treatment.</abstract>

II-nd Department of Otolaryngology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Oral Health and Dental Office Management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Silent sinus syndrome - Case presentation

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Tumors of the maxillary sinus pose difficult challenges in a young patient. Our paper presents a very rare case of an odontogenic myxoma extended to the maxillary sinus, in a 14-year-old girl. The clinical picture suggested a malignancy or a local infection. The surgical removal was complete and the diagnosis was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Discussions are made from the perspective of already published cases. A review of the disease is performed. CONCLUSION. Myxoma is a benign but aggressive tumor, needing complete surgical excision for a good long-term outcome.</abstract>

ENT Department, “M.S. Curie” Children Hospital, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

ENT Department, “G. Alexandrescu” Emergency Hospital for Children, Bucharest, Romania

Odontogenic myxoma invading the maxillary sinus – Case presentation

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 14 (2024): Issue 54 (April 2024)

Volume 14 (2024): Issue 53 (March 2024)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 52 (December 2023)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 51 (July 2023)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 50 (April 2023)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 49 (March 2023)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 48 (December 2022)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 47 (July 2022)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 46 (April 2022)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 45 (March 2022)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 44 (December 2021)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 43 (September 2021)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 42 (June 2021)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 41 (March 2021)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 40 (December 2020)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 39 (September 2020)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 38 (June 2020)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 37 (March 2020)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 36 (December 2019)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 35 (September 2019)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 34 (June 2019)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 33 (March 2019)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 32 (October 2018)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 31 (September 2018)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 30 (June 2018)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 29 (March 2018)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 28 (December 2017)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 27 (September 2017)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 26 (June 2017)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 25 (March 2017)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 24 (December 2016)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 23 (September 2016)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 22 (June 2016)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 21 (March 2016)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 20 (December 2015)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 19 (September 2015)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 18 (June 2015)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 17 (March 2015)

Romanian Journal of Rhinology

Rhinology, as an important part of Otorhinolaryngology, addresses a very frequent and diverse pathology, with important interdisciplinary implications. In the last decades, this medical field was the beneficiary of new technical means for accurate and effective investigation, treatment and research. The needs of modern medicine - over-specialization, interdisciplinary approach and evidence-based medicine, lead to the situation that the international rhinologic societies are the most dynamic and appreciated.  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology is the official scientific publication of the Romanian Rhinologic Society, and it is trying to fill the existing gap in the Romanian ENT literature, promoting modern publishing and criteria according to the international standards. Romanian Journal of Rhinology appears quarterly with the purpose to publish original articles, original clinical reports, clinically relevant experimental studies and short communications presenting new results of general interest. Its aim is to concentrate and provide information concerning care, cure and prevention of different rhinologic disorders and borderline pathology. With a peer review by an important national and international editorial board, the journal provides clinical and clinically related information written by authors from all over the world.  Journal’s business model  Romanian Journal of Rhinology is an Open Access journal. The submission and publication of the articles are free of charge, in both print and electronic publication. The publisher covers all costs – editing, printing, copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, journal management.  Romanian Journal of Rhinology is the journal of the Romanian Rhinologic Society; thus, one of the financial sources for publication is represented by the Society from the manuscript fees.  Advertisements represent another important founding source. The decision regarding the type of advertisements, acceptance/rejections, the price offering is made by the Publishing/technical Editor, the Editorial Board having no decision power on this aspect. Advertorials and publicity about pharmacological devices, drugs, supplements related to rhinologic and otolaryngologic pathologies can be taken into consideration. In case of Advertorials, with an important scientific content, the medical data presented will have the approval of the Journal’s Editors.  There is also available the annual subscription for individuals and companies. The contact person is also the Publishing/technical Editor.  Publication schedule  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology is published quarterly:   January-March (publication month: February)  April-June (publication month: April)  July-September (publication month: July)  October-December (publication month: October)  Editorial process  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology uses a standard scheme for the evaluation process of the submitted articles. All manuscripts are strictly reviewed for originality, correctness, methodology, quality of the medical information, suitability for the journal’s medical field, ethical nature.  The Editors reserve the right to refuse any manuscript which does not correspond to the submission guidelines.  Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the otorhinolaryngology area assess the submitted manuscripts for originality, validity, and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal.  After submission:   All manuscript are treated as confidential documents, all being assigned with a registration number (for example, RJR010121 (day of submission)(month of submission) (the last two numbers of the year of submission)). All communications between the editors, the author(s), the reviewers are made by using this identification number.  Technical review performed by the editor-in-chief, associated editors, members of the editorial board analyses – the importance of the subject, presentation clarity, relevance, plagiarism index. Submissions that fail to fulfil all requirements are rejected. This process last for a few days after submission.  Review process. The Romanian Journal of Rhinology has a double-blind reviewing process, in which the reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. Therefore, the authors are required to submit a blind manuscript without the authors’ names and affiliations on the title page or in the text and a separate title page with the names of the authors, affiliations, and information about the corresponding author. After the initial assessment for, submissions are sent to at least two experts in the field who are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically coherent, easy to read, useful in the field, and whether the manuscript should be accepted, rejected or revised. The review process will take approximately 2 weeks. After the review process is completed, the corresponding author will receive an e- mail about the evaluation results of the submitted manuscript: accepted, revision or rejection. If the e-mail contains suggestions and comments for revising the manuscript, the authors should make the changes and return to the editor within 2 weeks; if not, the manuscript is considered rejected. If the manuscript is accepted for publication by the reviewers, it is forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief. The final decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the recommendations of reviewers reports and the journal’s editors. Where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. The Editor-in-Chief may advice the corresponding author to make necessary revisions in order to publish the article. The final form of the article will be sent to the main author for the last approval from his/her part (if there are minor changes these should be send in no more than 1 week).  The publication process after the article’s submission may take 45 days, average. All accepted articles are assigned with a DOI number.  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals and required ICMJSE to be listed as a journal that follows these recommendations.  Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 