Introduction

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This paper discusses the outcomes of a participatory research process with homeless parents living in Dublin-based emergency accommodation, during which a critical appraisal of a range of government schemes was coconstructed. The focus is on examining the impacts on vulnerable families of the marketisation of social housing. This is examined through the homeless families’ attempts to procure private rented housing using the Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) and their experience of life in family hub emergency accommodation. The significant challenges experienced by homeless families are examined from the perspectives of human rights and capability theory. The paper concludes that the Rent Supplement, Rental Accommodation Scheme and HAP are costly market-oriented schemes and unlikely to provide satisfactory long-term housing solutions, while family hubs are far from ideal from a capability or human rights perspective. Only a significant increase in the direct provision of social housing by local authorities and housing associations can provide ontological security and well-being, and advance human-rights-based social housing.</abstract>

An absence of rights: Homeless families and social housing marketisation in Ireland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Lack of access to affordable quality homes constitutes a significant crisis for workers, families and communities in the Republic of Ireland. Current government plans appear to be insufficient to make a significant impact. Pressure on individuals and families is a direct consequence of under - investment over many years, as well as a failure on the part of a market-led and property-developer-led model of housing to deliver enough dwellings to meet the needs of a growing population. The optimum solution, we propose, is the establishment of The Housing Company of Ireland, which will draw on long-term borrowing combined with an equity injection from the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, and will undertake or commission, on a commercial basis, a programme of planning, building, acquiring and renting of new homes. This investment will supplement and further strengthen work by the local authorities and the voluntary housing associations in the area of social housing.</abstract>

Ireland’s housing crisis – The case for a European cost rental model

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Access to housing is a crucial issue worldwide. It is still under discussion whether collaborative economy is enhancing or, on the contrary, constraining access. In this context, the concept of ‘collaborative housing’ (collaborative economy applied to the funding, access and organisation of housing) arises to address a range of situations that might potentially help people to access housing, such as co-housing or the so-called ‘intermediate tenures’. Disintermediation through blockchain technology, and the resultant effect of a reduction in the transaction costs of access to housing, is one of those trends regarding collaborative housing. Accordingly, the adaptation of the disintermediation mechanism to the real estate conveyance and land registry, as in many other sectors of the collaborative economy, is timely. This can be achieved by exploring the potential of this mechanism in enhancing traditional methods of this sector through possible technological solutions. This paper presents a preliminary discussion on the different types of collaborative housing and the potentials of the blockchain technology to facilitate access to housing in relation to real estate conveyancing and registration.</abstract>

Collaborative housing and blockchain

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This paper contrasts, and critically evaluates, the Irish regulatory regimes for building control and food safety. It concludes that the systems are similar in design, but vary greatly in implementation, drawing on analysis of enforcement statistics published by the Food Safety Authority of Ireland and obtained from building control authorities. It is argued that regulatory systems require enforcement and oversight in order to verify consistency of decisionmaking, compliance with their own rules and standards, and overall effectiveness, and that this lack of emphasis on enforcement and oversight is a significant failing in the Irish building control system.</abstract>

Regulation of housing quality in Ireland: What can be learned from food safety?

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Increasing numbers of people live under residential licences as a result of pressure on the housing market. Residential licences arise in disparate circumstances, including in house shares, under the rent-a-room scheme and where people live in their parents’ home. This paper outlines the legal construct of licences: at base, a permission to reside. It sets out factors that distinguish licences from tenancies, in particular the absence of exclusive possession. While licences are subject to minimal regulation in comparison to tenancies, this paper presents licensors’ and licencees’ rights in their constitutional, common-law and statutory context, including standards of accommodation and ‘packing-up’ periods. It reflects on the constitutional position presented by a licensee under a licensor’s tenancy obtaining the right to become a tenant under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2004–16. In particular, it probes whether constitutional rights to the inviolability of the dwelling may be balanced in favour of augmenting licensees’ rights. In this context it posits potential for reform while highlighting the regulatory challenge presented by heterogeneous forms of licences.</abstract>

The limited rights of residential licensees in Ireland: A case for carefully targeted legal reform

Service charge collection in multi-unit developments

Demography is destiny: Strategic planning and housing in Ireland

Market-led housing supply and the lure of demand stimulants in the UK

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 72 (2024): Issue 2 (May 2024)

Volume 72 (2024): Issue 1 (February 2024) Special title: Review of developments, structure and management in the public sector 2023

Volume 71 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 71 (2023): Issue 3 (August 2023)

Volume 71 (2023): Issue 2 (May 2023)

Volume 71 (2023): Issue 1 (February 2023) REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS, STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR 2022

Volume 70 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 70 (2022): Issue 3 (August 2022)

Volume 70 (2022): Issue 2 (May 2022)

Volume 70 (2022): Issue 1 (February 2022) REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS, STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR 2021

Volume 69 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 69 (2021): Issue 3 (August 2021)

Volume 69 (2021): Issue 2 (May 2021)

Volume 69 (2021): Issue 1 (February 2021)

Volume 68 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 68 (2020): Issue 3 (August 2020)

Volume 68 (2020): Issue 2 (May 2020)

Volume 68 (2020): Issue 1 (February 2020)

Volume 67 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 67 (2019): Issue 3 (August 2019)

Volume 67 (2019): Issue 2 (May 2019)

Volume 67 (2019): Issue 1 (February 2019)

Volume 66 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 66 (2018): Issue 3 (August 2018)

Volume 66 (2018): Issue 2 (May 2018)

Volume 66 (2018): Issue 1 (February 2018)

Volume 65 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 65 (2017): Issue 3 (August 2017)

Volume 65 (2017): Issue 2 (May 2017)

Volume 65 (2017): Issue 1 (February 2017)

Volume 64 (2016): Issue 3-4 (December 2016)

Volume 64 (2016): Issue 2 (August 2016)

Volume 64 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)

Volume 63 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 63 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)

Volume 63 (2015): Issue 2 (August 2015)

Volume 63 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)

Administration

 PRINT ISSN: 0001-8325ONLINE ISSN: 2449-9471  Administration is the peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Ireland. It has been published quarterly since 1953. As the principal journal concerned with Irish public administration and its development, it seeks to combine original scholarship on public administration from a variety of disciplines with the insights and experiences of practitioners.  Rejection Rate   80%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Administration

Volume 66 (2018): Issue 2 (May 2018)

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR

Introduction

ARTICLES