[1. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 2071-7.10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440627681420008689]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Naqfel RD, Hanson R, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009; 251: 175-84.10.1148/radiol.251108129619332852]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008; 81: 362-78.10.1259/bjr/0194845418440940]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2277-84.10.1056/NEJMra07214918046031]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Little MP. Risks associated with ionizing radiation. Br Med Bull. 2003; 68: 259-27510.1093/bmb/ldg03114757722]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010; 254:326-41.10.1148/radiol.254208231220093507]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bor D, Olgar T, Toklu T, Caglan A, Onal E, Padovani R. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology. Phys Med. 2009; 25: 31-42.10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.03.00218440265]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1-4.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TY, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248:254-63.10.1148/radiol.248107145118566177]Search in Google Scholar
[10. International Commission of Radiation Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007; 37:1-332.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Richards PJ, George J, Metelko M, Brown M. Spine computed tomography dose and cancer induction. Spine 2010; 35:430-3.10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdde4720081559]Search in Google Scholar
[12. IAEA: Radiation protection of patients (RPOP): Information for X-ray. Available from: http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/InformationFor/Patients/patient-information-x-rays/index.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1999. Radiat Res. 2007; 168: 1-64.10.1667/RR0763.117722996]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Little MP. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. J Radiol Prot. 2009; 29: A43-59.10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S0419454804]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS 3rd, Boice JD Jr. Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989, 81: 1307-12.10.1093/jnci/81.17.13072769783]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Doody M, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DJ, Luckyanov N, Land CE. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine. 2000; 25: 2052-63.10.1097/00007632-200008150-0000910954636]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Infante-Rivard C. Diagnostic x rays, DNA repair genes and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 60-4.10.1097/00004032-200307000-0001212852472]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 47-59.10.1097/00004032-200307000-0001112852471]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Kleinerman RA. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36 Suppl 2: 121-5.10.1007/s00247-006-0191-5266365316862418]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Preston RJ. Update on linear non-threshold doseresponse model and implications for diagnostic radiologic procedures. Health Physics. 2008; 95: 541-6.10.1097/01.HP.0000326332.80829.6318849687]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposure? Br J Radiol. 2007; 80: 639-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. National Radiological Protection Board. Board statement on diagnostic medical exposures to ionizing radiation during pregnancy and estimates of late radiation risks to the UK population. Documents of the NRPB, vol 4, No. 4. Chilton: NRPB 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Rannikko S, Ermakov I, Lampinen JS, Toivonen M, Darila KTK, Chervjakov A. Computing patient doses of X-ray examinations using a patient size- and sexadjustable phantom. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70: 708-18.10.1259/bjr.70.835.92458839245883]Search in Google Scholar
[24. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR 16262 EN, Luxembourg 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. European Commission. European quality criteria for multislice CT. Luxembourg 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Hatziioannou K, Papanastassiou E, Delichas M, Bousbouras P. A contribution to establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT. Br J Radiol. 2003; 76: 541-5.10.1259/bjr/6089704612893696]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Kiljunen T, Tietavainen A, Parviainen T, Viitala A, Kortesniemi M. Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50: 114-24.10.1080/0284185080257056119096954]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Kharita MH, Khazzam S. Survey of patient dose in computed tomography in Syria 2009. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010; 1-13.10.1093/rpd/ncq15520511400]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Choi J, Cha S, Lee K, Shin D, Kang J, Kim Y, et al. The development of a guidance level for patient dose for CT examinations in Korea. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010; 138: 137-43.10.1093/rpd/ncp23619864327]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003.Br J Radiol. 2006; 79: 968-80.10.1259/bjr/9327743417213302]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[31. Rehani MM. Radiation protection in newer imaging technologies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010; 139: 357-62.10.1093/rpd/ncq00520142278]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Harrison JD, Streffer C. The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: there basis and application. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2007; 127: 12-18.10.1093/rpd/ncm24818003712]Search in Google Scholar
[33. McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 890-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 881-9. 10.2214/AJR.09.346220308486]Search in Google Scholar