Zacytuj

1. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 2071-7.10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440627681420008689Search in Google Scholar

2. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Naqfel RD, Hanson R, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009; 251: 175-84.10.1148/radiol.251108129619332852Search in Google Scholar

3. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008; 81: 362-78.10.1259/bjr/0194845418440940Search in Google Scholar

4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2277-84.10.1056/NEJMra07214918046031Search in Google Scholar

5. Little MP. Risks associated with ionizing radiation. Br Med Bull. 2003; 68: 259-27510.1093/bmb/ldg03114757722Search in Google Scholar

6. Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010; 254:326-41.10.1148/radiol.254208231220093507Search in Google Scholar

7. Bor D, Olgar T, Toklu T, Caglan A, Onal E, Padovani R. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology. Phys Med. 2009; 25: 31-42.10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.03.00218440265Search in Google Scholar

8. Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1-4.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TY, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248:254-63.10.1148/radiol.248107145118566177Search in Google Scholar

10. International Commission of Radiation Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007; 37:1-332.Search in Google Scholar

11. Richards PJ, George J, Metelko M, Brown M. Spine computed tomography dose and cancer induction. Spine 2010; 35:430-3.10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdde4720081559Search in Google Scholar

12. IAEA: Radiation protection of patients (RPOP): Information for X-ray. Available from: http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/InformationFor/Patients/patient-information-x-rays/index.htm.Search in Google Scholar

13. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1999. Radiat Res. 2007; 168: 1-64.10.1667/RR0763.117722996Search in Google Scholar

14. Little MP. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. J Radiol Prot. 2009; 29: A43-59.10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S0419454804Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS 3rd, Boice JD Jr. Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989, 81: 1307-12.10.1093/jnci/81.17.13072769783Search in Google Scholar

16. Doody M, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DJ, Luckyanov N, Land CE. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine. 2000; 25: 2052-63.10.1097/00007632-200008150-0000910954636Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Infante-Rivard C. Diagnostic x rays, DNA repair genes and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 60-4.10.1097/00004032-200307000-0001212852472Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 47-59.10.1097/00004032-200307000-0001112852471Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Kleinerman RA. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36 Suppl 2: 121-5.10.1007/s00247-006-0191-5266365316862418Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Preston RJ. Update on linear non-threshold doseresponse model and implications for diagnostic radiologic procedures. Health Physics. 2008; 95: 541-6.10.1097/01.HP.0000326332.80829.6318849687Search in Google Scholar

21. Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposure? Br J Radiol. 2007; 80: 639-47.Search in Google Scholar

22. National Radiological Protection Board. Board statement on diagnostic medical exposures to ionizing radiation during pregnancy and estimates of late radiation risks to the UK population. Documents of the NRPB, vol 4, No. 4. Chilton: NRPB 1993.Search in Google Scholar

23. Rannikko S, Ermakov I, Lampinen JS, Toivonen M, Darila KTK, Chervjakov A. Computing patient doses of X-ray examinations using a patient size- and sexadjustable phantom. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70: 708-18.10.1259/bjr.70.835.92458839245883Search in Google Scholar

24. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR 16262 EN, Luxembourg 1999.Search in Google Scholar

25. European Commission. European quality criteria for multislice CT. Luxembourg 2004.Search in Google Scholar

26. Hatziioannou K, Papanastassiou E, Delichas M, Bousbouras P. A contribution to establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT. Br J Radiol. 2003; 76: 541-5.10.1259/bjr/6089704612893696Search in Google Scholar

27. Kiljunen T, Tietavainen A, Parviainen T, Viitala A, Kortesniemi M. Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50: 114-24.10.1080/0284185080257056119096954Search in Google Scholar

28. Kharita MH, Khazzam S. Survey of patient dose in computed tomography in Syria 2009. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010; 1-13.10.1093/rpd/ncq15520511400Search in Google Scholar

29. Choi J, Cha S, Lee K, Shin D, Kang J, Kim Y, et al. The development of a guidance level for patient dose for CT examinations in Korea. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010; 138: 137-43.10.1093/rpd/ncp23619864327Search in Google Scholar

30. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003.Br J Radiol. 2006; 79: 968-80.10.1259/bjr/9327743417213302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Rehani MM. Radiation protection in newer imaging technologies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010; 139: 357-62.10.1093/rpd/ncq00520142278Search in Google Scholar

32. Harrison JD, Streffer C. The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: there basis and application. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2007; 127: 12-18.10.1093/rpd/ncm24818003712Search in Google Scholar

33. McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 890-6.Search in Google Scholar

34. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 881-9. 10.2214/AJR.09.346220308486Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1875-855X
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
6 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing, Basic Medical Science, other, Clinical Medicine