Otwarty dostęp

Morphological taxonomy in the present-day generative framework: A case study of English and Czech nominalization


Zacytuj

Abney, S. P., 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A., 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/la.42Search in Google Scholar

Allen, M. R., 1978. Morphological investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, M. C., 1985. The Mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 373-415.Search in Google Scholar

Barker, Ch., 2016. Why relational nominals make good concealed questions. Lingua, SI: Understanding Possession, vol. 182, pp. 12-29.10.1016/j.lingua.2016.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. D., 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, H., 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Studies in Generative Grammar 13. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110808506Search in Google Scholar

Borer, H., 2005-2013. Structuring sense: Volume I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In: Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 11-61.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130, pp. 33-49.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Dubinsky, S., and R. Simango, 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72, pp. 749-781.10.2307/416101Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. E., 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, pp. 613-632.Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. E., 1991. The autonomy of the (syntactic) lexicon and syntax: Insertion conditions for derivational and inflectional morphemes. In: C. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara, eds. Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S. Y. Kuroda. Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 119-148.10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_7Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. E., 2000. Lexicon & grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. E., 2018. The dual nature of derivational morphology: English agentive –er. Anglophone Conference 2018 at Univerzity Hradec Králové, March 22-23, 2018. Proceedings forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J., 1991. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, M. and Marantz, A., 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale and S.J. Keyser, eds. The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-176.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, H., 2007. Distributed morphology. Lecture Notes. Ms. University of Arizona. [Accessed 2 September 2018]. Available at: http://heidiharley.com/heidiharley/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2007-DistributedMorphologyABRALIN2007.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Harley, H. and Noyer, R., 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations. In: B. Peters, ed. The lexicon-encyclopedia interface. Oxford: Elsevier Press, pp. 349-374.10.1163/9780585474465_014Search in Google Scholar

Hazout, I., 1995. Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.13, no.3, pp. 355-404.10.1007/BF00992736Search in Google Scholar

Karlík, P., 2000. Valence substantiv v modifikované valenční teorii. In: Čeština: univerzália a specifika. Sborník konference ve Šlapanicích u Brna 17.-19.11.1999, pp. 181-192.Search in Google Scholar

Karlík, P., and Nübler, N.,1998. Poznámky k nominalizaci v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost, vol. 59, no.2, pp. 105-112.Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, R. W., 2017. Nominalization, specification, and investigation. PhD diss. Universiy of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Lees, R., 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. International Journal of Americal Linguistics vol. 26, no. 3. Reprint in Indiana University Research Center, Bloomington.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, R., 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, R., 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.10.1017/CBO9781316676288Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, A., 2007. Phases and words. In: S.H. Choe, ed. Phases in the theory of grammar. Seoul: Dong- In Publishing, pp. 191-222.Search in Google Scholar

Rozwadowska, B., 2018. What psych nominals can tell us about the event structure of psych verbs. The paper presented in Olomouc Linguistic Colloquium, June 2018. To appear in Proceedings.Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, E., 1923. The Algonkin affinity of Yurok and Wiyot kinship terms. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris, vol.15, pp. 37-74.10.3406/jsa.1922.3991Search in Google Scholar

Sichel, I., 2010. Event strucure constraints in nominalizations. In: A. Alexiadou and M. Rathers, eds. The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 151-190.10.1515/9783110245875.159Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, D., 1979. Topics in English morphology. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, W., 1998. On the aspectual properties of English derived nominals. In: O. Sauerland and O. Percus, eds. The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25, pp. 125-139.Search in Google Scholar

Veselovská, L., 2001. K analýze českých deverbálních substantiv. Čeština: Univerzália a specifika 3, pp. 11–28.Search in Google Scholar

Veselovská, L., 1998. Possessive movement in the Czech nominal phrase. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 255–300.Search in Google Scholar

Veselovská, L., 2018. Noun phrases in Czech: Their structure and agreements. Berlin: Peter Lang, forthcoming.10.3726/b14278Search in Google Scholar

Veselovská, L. and Emonds, J., 2016. Morphology, divided and conquered. Linguistica Brunensia, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 143-162.Search in Google Scholar

Veselovská, L. and Karlík, P., 2004. Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 163–235.10.1524/slaw.2004.49.2.163Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, T. A., 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In: P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and J. Bresnan, eds. Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 327-360.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, E., 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word.’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 12, pp. 245-274.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6504
ISSN:
1337-7590
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
2 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Linguistics and Semiotics, Theoretical Frameworks and Disciplines, Linguistics, other, Philosophy of Language