[Abney, S. P., 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexiadou, A., 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/la.42]Search in Google Scholar
[Allen, M. R., 1978. Morphological investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, M. C., 1985. The Mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 373-415.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barker, Ch., 2016. Why relational nominals make good concealed questions. Lingua, SI: Understanding Possession, vol. 182, pp. 12-29.10.1016/j.lingua.2016.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bobaljik, J. D., 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borer, H., 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Studies in Generative Grammar 13. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110808506]Search in Google Scholar
[Borer, H., 2005-2013. Structuring sense: Volume I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N., 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In: Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 11-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N., 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130, pp. 33-49.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubinsky, S., and R. Simango, 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72, pp. 749-781.10.2307/416101]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Emonds, J. E., 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, pp. 613-632.]Search in Google Scholar
[Emonds, J. E., 1991. The autonomy of the (syntactic) lexicon and syntax: Insertion conditions for derivational and inflectional morphemes. In: C. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara, eds. Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S. Y. Kuroda. Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 119-148.10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Emonds, J. E., 2000. Lexicon & grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996]Search in Google Scholar
[Emonds, J. E., 2018. The dual nature of derivational morphology: English agentive –er. Anglophone Conference 2018 at Univerzity Hradec Králové, March 22-23, 2018. Proceedings forthcoming.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimshaw, J., 1991. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halle, M. and Marantz, A., 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale and S.J. Keyser, eds. The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-176.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harley, H., 2007. Distributed morphology. Lecture Notes. Ms. University of Arizona. [Accessed 2 September 2018]. Available at: http://heidiharley.com/heidiharley/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2007-DistributedMorphologyABRALIN2007.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Harley, H. and Noyer, R., 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations. In: B. Peters, ed. The lexicon-encyclopedia interface. Oxford: Elsevier Press, pp. 349-374.10.1163/9780585474465_014]Search in Google Scholar
[Hazout, I., 1995. Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.13, no.3, pp. 355-404.10.1007/BF00992736]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlík, P., 2000. Valence substantiv v modifikované valenční teorii. In: Čeština: univerzália a specifika. Sborník konference ve Šlapanicích u Brna 17.-19.11.1999, pp. 181-192.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlík, P., and Nübler, N.,1998. Poznámky k nominalizaci v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost, vol. 59, no.2, pp. 105-112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawrence, R. W., 2017. Nominalization, specification, and investigation. PhD diss. Universiy of California, Berkeley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lees, R., 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. International Journal of Americal Linguistics vol. 26, no. 3. Reprint in Indiana University Research Center, Bloomington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieber, R., 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieber, R., 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.10.1017/CBO9781316676288]Search in Google Scholar
[Marantz, A., 2007. Phases and words. In: S.H. Choe, ed. Phases in the theory of grammar. Seoul: Dong- In Publishing, pp. 191-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rozwadowska, B., 2018. What psych nominals can tell us about the event structure of psych verbs. The paper presented in Olomouc Linguistic Colloquium, June 2018. To appear in Proceedings.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sapir, E., 1923. The Algonkin affinity of Yurok and Wiyot kinship terms. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris, vol.15, pp. 37-74.10.3406/jsa.1922.3991]Search in Google Scholar
[Sichel, I., 2010. Event strucure constraints in nominalizations. In: A. Alexiadou and M. Rathers, eds. The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 151-190.10.1515/9783110245875.159]Search in Google Scholar
[Siegel, D., 1979. Topics in English morphology. New York: Garland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snyder, W., 1998. On the aspectual properties of English derived nominals. In: O. Sauerland and O. Percus, eds. The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25, pp. 125-139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veselovská, L., 2001. K analýze českých deverbálních substantiv. Čeština: Univerzália a specifika 3, pp. 11–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veselovská, L., 1998. Possessive movement in the Czech nominal phrase. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 255–300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veselovská, L., 2018. Noun phrases in Czech: Their structure and agreements. Berlin: Peter Lang, forthcoming.10.3726/b14278]Search in Google Scholar
[Veselovská, L. and Emonds, J., 2016. Morphology, divided and conquered. Linguistica Brunensia, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 143-162.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veselovská, L. and Karlík, P., 2004. Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 163–235.10.1524/slaw.2004.49.2.163]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasow, T. A., 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In: P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and J. Bresnan, eds. Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 327-360.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, E., 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word.’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 12, pp. 245-274.]Search in Google Scholar