[Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, no.1, pp. 611-639.10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611]Search in Google Scholar
[Benn, S., Dunphy, D. and Griffiths, A., 2014. Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London/NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315819181]Search in Google Scholar
[Benjamin, D., Han-Hui, P. and Budescu, D., 2016. Climate change versus global warming: Who is susceptible to the framing of climate change? Environment and Behavior, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 745-770.10.1177/0013916516664382]Search in Google Scholar
[Berbes-Blazques, M., C. et al., 2017. Understanding climate change and resilience: assessing strengths and opportunities for adaptation in the Global South. Climatic Change, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 227-241.10.1007/s10584-017-1897-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N., 2007. A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 99-118.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, J. et al., 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R. and Zundel, M., 2011. The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1701–1716.10.1177/0170840611425729]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cranmer, G. A., Bowman, N. D. and Goldman, Z. W., 2017. A preliminary study of racialized brawn and brain framing effects. Communication Research Reports, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 78-83.10.1080/08824096.2016.1224165]Search in Google Scholar
[Curran, G., 2017. Social licence, corporate social responsibility and coal seam gas: framing the new political dynamics of contestation. Energy Policy, vol.101, pp. 427-435.10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.042]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, T., 2017. Verbal and visual framing activity in climate change discourse. The role of language in the climate change debate, 13, pp. 29-46.10.4324/9781315456935-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, T., 2015. Contested science in the media: Linguistic traces of news writers’ framing activity. Written Communication, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 39-65.10.1177/0741088314557623]Search in Google Scholar
[De Vries, G., Terwell, B.W. and Ellemers, N., 2015. Perceptions of manipulation and judgements of illegitimacy: Pitfalls in the use of emphasis framing when communicating about CO2 capture and storage. Environmental Communication, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 206-226.10.1080/17524032.2015.1047884]Search in Google Scholar
[Doyle, J., 2007. Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science and Culture, vol. 16, no. 2, pp.129-150.10.1080/09505430701368938]Search in Google Scholar
[Entman, R. M., 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51-58.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fløttum, K. and Gjerstad, Ø., 2017. Narratives in climate change discourse. WIREs Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 1-15.10.1002/wcc.429]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia, M.M., 2011. Perception is truth: How US newspapers framed the ‘Go Green’ conflict between BP and Greenpeace. Public Relations Review, vol. 37, pp. 57-59.10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gebara, M. F. et al., 2017. Framing REDD+ in the Brazilian national media: how discourses evolved amid global negotiation uncertainties. Climate Change, vol. 1, pp. 1-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goffman, E., 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonenc, H. and Scholtens, B., 2017. Environmental and financial performance of fossil fuel firms: a closer inspection of their interaction. Ecological Economics, vol. 132, pp. 307-328.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Graham, C., 2017. The future is not what it used to be: oil and gas strategies for a carbon-conscious world. The APPEA Journal, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 459-461.10.1071/AJ17017]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurlstone, M. J. et al., 2017. Cooperation studies of catastrophe avoidance: implications for climate negotiations. Climatic Change, vol.140, pp. 119–133.10.1007/s10584-016-1838-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaspal, R. and Nerlich, B., 2014. When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Understanding of Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 122-141.10.1177/0963662512440219]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapranov, O., forthcoming. Shell’s image of climate change and its representations in the British financial press. In W. Giordano (ed.). Discourse, communication and the enterprise: Where Business meets language. Cambridge Scholar Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapranov, O., 2017. Conceptual metaphors associated with climate change in corporate reports in the fossil fuels market. Two perspectives from the United States and Australia. In: K. Fløttum (ed.) The role of language in the climate change debate. London/NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 102-122.10.4324/9781315456935-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapranov, O., 2017a. British Petroleum’s corporate discourse involving climate change before and after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: A cognitive linguistic account. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, vol. 22, pp. 211-223]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapranov, O., 2016. Corpus analysis of discourse markers in corporate reports involving climate change. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, vol.1, pp. 216-227.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapranov, O., 2015. Do international corporations speak in one voice on the issue of global climate change: The case of British Petroleum and The Royal Dutch Shell Group. In C. Cem and K. Papaja, eds. Global perspectives on social sciences and humanities. Theory and practice Warsaw: LiF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koteyko, N., Thelwall, M. and Nerlich, B., 2010. From carbon markets to carbon morality: Creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation. Science Communication, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 25-54.10.1177/1075547009340421]Search in Google Scholar
[Kropp, C. and Türk, J., 2017. Bringing climate change down to earth: Climate change governance from the bottom up. In: A. Esguerra et al., eds. Sustainability politics and limited statehood. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., pp.179-210.10.1007/978-3-319-39871-6_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, G., 2006. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts, ed. Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 185-237.10.1515/9783110199901.185]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L. and Gaeth, G. J., 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, vol.76, no. 2, pp. 149-188.10.1006/obhd.1998.2804]Search in Google Scholar
[Livesey, S. M., 2002. Global warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to Exxonmobil’s corporate public discourse. Journal of Business Communication, vol. 39, pp. 117-146.10.1177/002194360203900106]Search in Google Scholar
[Lopez Maestre, M.D., 2000. The business of cognitive stylistics: A survey of conceptual metaphors in business English. Atlantis, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47-69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyon, T. P. and Montgomery, W., 2015. The means and end of greenwash. Organization and Environment, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 223-249.10.1177/1086026615575332]Search in Google Scholar
[Marhsall, G., 2007. Carbon detox: Your step-by-step guide to getting real about climate change. Hachette UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matejek, S. and Gössling, T., 2014. Beyond legitimacy: A case study of BP’s ‘green lashing’. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 571-584.10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthes, J. and Kohring, M., 2008. The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 258−279.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, T. A. et al., 2012. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. A Letter. Climatic Change, vol. 113, pp. 1105–1112.10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Nerlich, B. and Jaspal, R., 2013. UK media representations of carbon capture and storage: actors, frames and metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World, vol. 3, no.1, pp.35-53.10.1075/msw.3.1.02ner]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilsen, T., 2017. Innovation from the inside out: Contrasting fossil and renewable energy pathways at Statoil. Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 28, pp. 50-57.10.1016/j.erss.2017.03.015]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nisbet, M. C., 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, vol. 51, no. 2, pp.12-23.10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23]Search in Google Scholar
[Scanlan, S. J., 2017. Framing fracking: scale-shifting and greenwashing risk in the oil and gas industry. Local Environment, vol. 22, no.11, pp. 1311-1337.10.1080/13549839.2017.1345877]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmid-Petri, H. and Arlt, D., 2016. Constructing an illusion of scientific uncertainty? Framing climate change in German and British print media. Communications, vol. 41, no.3, pp.265–289.10.1515/commun-2016-0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Shehata, A. and Hopmann, D. N., 2012. Framing climate change. Journalism Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 175-192.10.1080/1461670X.2011.646396]Search in Google Scholar
[Spence, A. and Pidgeon, N., 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome. Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, pp.656-667.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Starbird, K. et al., 2015. Social media, public participation, and the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 605-630.10.1080/10807039.2014.947866]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2001. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2001.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2002. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2002.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2003. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainable_report_2003.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2004. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainable_report_2004.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2005. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainable_report_2005.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2006. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2006.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2007. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%202007.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2008. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Key_sustainability_performance_data_2008.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2009. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%20report%202009.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2010. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%20report%202010.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2011. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%20report%202011.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2012. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report2012.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2013. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/SustainabilityReport.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2014. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017].Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2014.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Statoil, 2015. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/statoil-sustainability-report-2015.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Swain, K. A., 2017. Mass Media Roles in Climate Change Mitigation. In W.-Y. Chen et al. (eds.), Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (pp.169-208), DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_6.10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Trenberth, K. E., 2012. Framing the way to relate climate extremes to climate change. Climatic Change, vol. 115, pp. 283-290.10.1007/s10584-012-0441-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Tynkkynen, N., 2010. A great ecological power in global climate policy? Framing climate change as a policy problem in Russian public discussion. Environmental Politics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 179-195.10.1080/09644010903574459]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[https://www.statoil.com/en/how-and-why/sustainability/sustainability-reports.html]Search in Google Scholar