Gender Differences and Other Findings on the Cognitive Reflection Test

Auld, M. C., Sidhu, N. (2005) Schooling, cognitive ability and health, Health Economics, 14(10), 1019–103410.1002/hec.1050Search in Google Scholar

Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., Metz, E. (2015) Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–28410.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Benbow, C. P., Stanley, J. C. (1980) Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact? Science, 210(12 December), 1978–198010.1126/science.7434028Search in Google Scholar

Brañas-Garza, P., Kujal, P., & Lenkei, B. (2015). Cognitive Reflection Test: Whom, how, when. Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Campitelli, G., Gerrans, P. (2014) Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach, Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–4710.3758/s13421-013-0367-9Search in Google Scholar

Campitelli, G., Labollita, M. (2010) Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices, Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 3, June 2010, pp. 182–19110.1017/S1930297500001066Search in Google Scholar

Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M. (2009) Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation, Judgment and Decision Making 4(1), 20–33.10.1017/S193029750000067XSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, J., Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005) Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning, Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–38910.1080/13546780542000005Search in Google Scholar

Evans, J., Frankisch, K. (2009) In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1979) The structure and measurement of intelligence, Springer-Verlag, New York10.1007/978-3-642-67075-6Search in Google Scholar

Frederick, S. (2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–4210.1257/089533005775196732Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. (2012) Reminders of secular authority reduce believers’ distrust of atheists, Psychological Science, 23(5), 483–9110.1177/0956797611429711Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, D. (2004) A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 135–13910.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00292.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hedges, L., Nowell, A. (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals, Science, 269(5220), 41–4510.1126/science.7604277Search in Google Scholar

Herrnstein, R. J., Murray, C. (1994) The bell curve: intelligence and class structure an American life, Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Lamon, S. J. (1990) Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance : A Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–15510.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, A. (1980) Bias in Mental Testing, Free Press.10.1017/S0140525X00005161Search in Google Scholar

Juanchich, M., Dewberry, C., Sirota, M., & Narendran, S. (2016). Cognitive Reflection Predicts Real-Life Decision Outcomes, but Not Over and Above Personality and Decision-Making Styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, (52-59).10.1002/bdm.1875Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Frederick, S. (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgmen, Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(3), 263–29110.2307/1914185Search in Google Scholar

Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., Pardo, S. T. (2011) Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4):361-38110.1002/bdm.752Search in Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Humphreys, L. G. (1997) Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences, Intelligence, 24(1), 159–20110.1016/S0160-2896(97)90016-7Search in Google Scholar

Marincas, D., David, O. A. (2013) Psycho-social Predictors of Baccalaureate Performance of Romanian Students: what Makes the Difference between Students who Fail and those who Succeed?, 14(2), 209Search in Google Scholar

Moro, R. (2009) On the nature of the conjunction fallacy, Synthese, 171(1), 1–2410.1007/s11229-008-9377-8Search in Google Scholar

Oechssler, J., Roider, A., Schmitz, P. W. (2009) Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 147–15210.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018Search in Google Scholar

Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., Greene, J. D. (2012) Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment, Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–17710.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. (2015) Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?, Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 341–34810.3758/s13428-015-0576-1Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A. (2012) Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief, Cognition, 123(3), 335–34610.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Popa, C. A., Bochiş, L. (2016) The influence of baccalaureate average score on academic achievement of undergraduates, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 61 (1), 95-106Search in Google Scholar

Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., Hamilton, J. (2016) The Development and Testing of a New Version of the Cognitive Reflection Test Applying Item Response Theory (IRT), Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–46910.1002/bdm.1883Search in Google Scholar

Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. (2011) Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(3), 423–810.1037/a0025391Search in Google Scholar

Sherman, J., Gawronski, B., Trope, Y. (2014) In two minds, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind, ebook: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1996) Genius: The natural history of creativity, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(4), 39510.1016/S0005-7967(96)90003-0Search in Google Scholar

Sloman, S. A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning, Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–2210.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665-72610.1017/S0140525X00003435Search in Google Scholar

Toplak, M. E., Stanovich, K. E. (2002) The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 197–20910.1037/0022-0663.94.1.197Search in Google Scholar

Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. (2011) The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks, Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–128910.3758/s13421-011-0104-1Search in Google Scholar

Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–16810.1080/13546783.2013.844729Search in Google Scholar

Travers, E., Rolison, J. J., Feeney, A. (2016) The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test, Cognition, 150, 109–11810.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1983), Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment, Psychological Review. 90 (4): 293–31510.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Rada, T. B. (2016). Explaining sex differences on the Cognitive Reflection Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 425–427.10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.034Search in Google Scholar