Otwarty dostęp

Spatial differences in migration of businesses: The example of Polish regions

Wojciech Dziemianowicz
Wojciech Dziemianowicz
   | 30 wrz 2018
Miscellanea Geographica's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Data publikacji: 30 wrz 2018
Zakres stron: 142 - 149
Otrzymano: 08 mar 2018
Przyjęty: 11 cze 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0021
Słowa kluczowe
© 2018 Wojciech Dziemianowicz, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Share of categories listed in the Polish Classification of Business Activity (PKD) in the companies that relocated (%) in 2014. Full names of categories: C – industrial processing; F – construction; G – wholesale and retail trade; repair of vehicles, including motorcycles; H – transport and storage; J – information and communication; L – activity related to providing services on the real estate market; M – professional, scientific and technical activity; Q – healthcare and social work; S – other service activity.
Share of categories listed in the Polish Classification of Business Activity (PKD) in the companies that relocated (%) in 2014. Full names of categories: C – industrial processing; F – construction; G – wholesale and retail trade; repair of vehicles, including motorcycles; H – transport and storage; J – information and communication; L – activity related to providing services on the real estate market; M – professional, scientific and technical activity; Q – healthcare and social work; S – other service activity.

Map 1

Number of migrated companies per 1,000 inhabitants in 2014. Source: own analysis on the basis of the data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
Number of migrated companies per 1,000 inhabitants in 2014. Source: own analysis on the basis of the data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Map 2

Spatial distribution of companies that, following changes in 2014, had moved to a different gmina by 2016 (“inflow” from inside and outside of voivodeship) (Poland=100). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
Spatial distribution of companies that, following changes in 2014, had moved to a different gmina by 2016 (“inflow” from inside and outside of voivodeship) (Poland=100). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Map 3

GDP per capita in 2016, Poland = 100 (in current prices). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
GDP per capita in 2016, Poland = 100 (in current prices). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Map 4

External migration balance per 10,000 business entities (2014–2016). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
External migration balance per 10,000 business entities (2014–2016). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Map 5

% of companies relocating within a voivodeship. Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
% of companies relocating within a voivodeship. Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Map 6

Size of internal migration and participation of voivodeships in the outflow of companies from other voivodeships (%). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
Size of internal migration and participation of voivodeships in the outflow of companies from other voivodeships (%). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Map 7

Flows of companies between main cities in Poland (the wide lines near each city indicate the inflow of companies to this city from a given other city). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)
Flows of companies between main cities in Poland (the wide lines near each city indicate the inflow of companies to this city from a given other city). Source: own analysis on the basis of data from GUS (Central Statistical Office)

Measures of concentration of phenomena

Coefficient of variationMax / MinAverage
201420162014201620142016
Companies changing location in 2014 and their target location in 201669.9080.988.3711.164,657.004,657.00
Newly registered companies66.4371.439.3610.8422,331.1921,830.69
Deregistered companies60.4360.547.307.4919,041.5018,371.81
Companies with foreign capital147.74146.3456.7156.671,654.001,622.56
Population size52.5852.875.335.402,404,912.632,402,206.20
Size of workforce according to actual place of performing work62.4963.797.397.69889,840.75935,275.69
Size of workforce according to location of seat84.8085.7811.4211.75646,237.44682,546.25

Share of cities in migration of companies to other cities in Poland (relocation of companies in the years 2014–2016)

Destination in 2016
Location in 2014WarsawGdańskKatowiceKrakówŁódźPoznańWrocław
% of total inflow of migrated companies
Warsaw8.79.79.514.68.78.6
Gdańsk2.10.70.30.60.50.7
Katowice1.40.22.71.80.80.9
Kraków3.61.64.61.30.82.3
Łódź2.60.40.90.60.71.2
Poznań4.71.92.22.02.73.1
Wrocław3.41.51.21.71.31.8
eISSN:
2084-6118
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Geosciences, Geography, other
Kanał RSS czasopisma