<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Research comparing heterosexuals with bisexuals and homosexuals in economics and the social sciences typically relies on two strategies to identify sexual orientation in existing survey data of general populations. Probing respondents to self-report their sexual orientation is generally considered the preferred option. Since self-reports are unavailable in most large multidisciplinary surveys, often researchers infer sexual orientation from the gender-constellation of a respondent’s partnership instead. Based on German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) data, this article reviews both strategies empirically in the context of a household panel survey. The analysis shows that self-reported and partnership-inferred sexual orientation are not mutual substitutes, instead leading to substantively different conclusions about differences between heterosexuals and LGBs (Lesbian, Gays, and Bisexuals). The article discusses problems of non-coverage in partnership-inferred sexual orientation and also investigates measurement error in self-reported sexual orientation, finding notable mode and interviewer effects.</p></abstract>

Research comparing heterosexuals with bisexuals and homosexuals in economics and the social sciences typically relies on two strategies to identify sexual orientation in existing survey data of general populations. Probing respondents to self-report their sexual orientation is generally considered the preferred option. Since self-reports are unavailable in most large multidisciplinary surveys, often researchers infer sexual orientation from the gender-constellation of a respondent’s partnership instead. Based on German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) data, this article reviews both strategies empirically in the context of a household panel survey. The analysis shows that self-reported and partnership-inferred sexual orientation are not mutual substitutes, instead leading to substantively different conclusions about differences between heterosexuals and LGBs (Lesbian, Gays, and Bisexuals). The article discusses problems of non-coverage in partnership-inferred sexual orientation and also investigates measurement error in self-reported sexual orientation, finding notable mode and interviewer effects.

Comparing Self-Reported and Partnership-Inferred Sexual Orientation in Household Surveys

Journal of Official Statistics

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Research comparing heterosexuals with bisexuals and homosexuals in economics and the social sciences typically relies on two strategies to identify sexual...

Comparing Self-Reported and Partnership-Inferred Sexual Orientation in Household Surveys

Data publikacji: 11 gru 2019

Zakres stron: 777 - 805

Otrzymano: 01 lis 2019

Przyjęty: 01 paź 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0033

Słowa kluczowe
Surveys, sexual orientation, measurement error, interviewer effects, survey methodology

© 2019 Simon Kühne et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Comparing Self-Reported and Partnership-Inferred Sexual Orientation in Household Surveys

Data publikacji: 11 gru 2019

Zakres stron: 777 - 805

Otrzymano: 01 lis 2019

Przyjęty: 01 paź 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0033

Słowa kluczoweSurveys, sexual orientation, measurement error, interviewer effects, survey methodology

© 2019 Simon Kühne et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
Surveys, sexual orientation, measurement error, interviewer effects, survey methodology