[1. Andrew, L., (2008). Early German Legal Anthropology: Albert Hermann Post and His Questionnaire, 52 Journal of African Law, 52, 114-126.10.1017/S0021855308000053]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bomhoff, J., (2012). Comparing Legal Argument, in Adams, M. & Bomhoff, J (eds), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (74-85): Cambridge University Press, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Blutman, L., (2010). In the Trap of a Legal Metaphor International Soft Law, ICLQ, 59, 605-624.10.1017/S0020589310000242]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Gutteridge, H.C., (1946). An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study & Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Hart, H.L.A., (1961). The Concept of Law (77-86): Oxford University Press, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hohfeld, W.N., (1917). Fundamental Legal Conceptions, as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, Yale Law Journal, 26 (8), 710-719.10.2307/786270]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Komárek, J., (2012). Reasoning with Previous Decisions in Adams, M. & Bomhoff, J. (eds), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (49-62): Cambridge University Press, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Legrand, P., Munday, R., (2003). Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (103-127): Cambridge: University Press, UK.10.1017/CBO9780511522260]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Nicholas, F., (2007). Comparative Commercial Law in E.Örücü & D.Nelken, Comparative Law. A Handbook (263-277): Hart Publishing Oxford, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Nils, J., (2006). Comparative Law and Comparative knowledge, in Mathias Reimann & Reinhard Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (310): Oxford University Press, OUP UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Örücü, E., Nelken, D., (2007). Comparative Law: A Handbook (69-85): Hart Publishing, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Örücü, A.E., (2006). Methodology of Comparative Law, in J.M. Smits (eds), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (442-443), Northampton, UK.10.4337/9781847200204.00047]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Patrick, H.G., (2006). The Aims of Comparative Law, in Smits, J. M. (eds.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (57-62): Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Richard, G., (2010). The Use and Abuse of Standards for Law: Global Governance and Offshore Financial Centers, North Carolina Law Review, 88, 501-594.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Van Den Bos, P.L., Thomas, M.S., Michael, M., Van Rossum, W., (2017). Methodology of Legal Research: Challenges and Opportunities, Utrecht Law Review, 13 (3), 1-8.10.18352/ulr.411]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Wilson, G., (2007). Comparative Legal Scholarship in McConville, M. & Hong Chui, W. (eds), Research Methods for Law (87-101): Edinburgh University Press, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. William, T., (2007). Globalization and Comparative Law in Örücü, E. & Nelken, D. (eds), Comparative Law. A Handbook (69-85): Hart Publishing Oxford, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Zubair, A.A.Q., (2014). The Role of Comparative Legal Research in the Development of Law, Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Science, 8 (9), 249-256.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Zumbansen, P.C., (2012). Comparative, Global and Transnational Constitutionalism: The Emergence of a Transnational Legal-pluralist Order, 1 Global Constitutionalism, 1, 8-16.10.1017/S2045381711000037]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Zweigert, K., Kotz, H., (1998). Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd Edition (40): OUP, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
