This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C., & Quintana, L. (2009). A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages. Scientometrics, 81(2), 347–366.ArdanuyJ.UrbanoC.QuintanaL.2009A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languagesScientometrics81234736610.1007/s11192-008-2143-3Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 164–175.BornmannL.LeydesdorffL.2017Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science dataJournal of Informetrics11116417510.1016/j.joi.2016.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Colavizza, G. (2018). Understanding the history of the humanities from a bibliometric perspective: Expansion, conjunctures, and traditions in the last decades of venetian historiography (1950–2013). History of Humanities, 3(2), 377–406.ColavizzaG.2018Understanding the history of the humanities from a bibliometric perspective: Expansion, conjunctures, and traditions in the last decades of venetian historiography (1950–2013)History of Humanities3237740610.1086/699300Search in Google Scholar
De Solla Price, D.J. (1986). Little science, big science. . . and beyond. Columbia University Press, New York.De Solla PriceD.J.1986Little science, big science. . . and beyondColumbia University PressNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Fanelli, D., & Larivière, V. (2016). Researchers’ individual publication rate has not increased in a century. PLoS One, 11(3), e0149504.FanelliD.LarivièreV.2016Researchers’ individual publication rate has not increased in a centuryPLoS One113e014950410.1371/journal.pone.0149504478473626960191Search in Google Scholar
Grafton, A. (1999). The footnote: A curious history. Harvard University Press.GraftonA.1999The footnote: A curious historyHarvard University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214.GusenbauerM.2019Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databasesScientometrics118117721410.1007/s11192-018-2958-5Search in Google Scholar
Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823–834.HaleviG.MoedH.Bar-IlanJ.2017Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the literatureJournal of Informetrics11382383410.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005Search in Google Scholar
Hammarfelt, B. (2012). Harvesting footnotes in a rural field: Citation patterns in Swedish literary studies. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 536–558.HammarfeltB.2012Harvesting footnotes in a rural field: Citation patterns in Swedish literary studiesJournal of Documentation68453655810.1108/00220411211239101Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.-W.K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61–73.HarzingA.-W.K.Van der WalR.2008Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysisEthics in Science and Environmental Politics81617310.3354/esep00076Search in Google Scholar
Hérubel, J.-P.V.M. (1999). Historical bibliometrics: Its purpose and significance to the history of disciplines. Libraries & Culture, 34(4), 380–388.HérubelJ.-P.V.M.1999Historical bibliometrics: Its purpose and significance to the history of disciplinesLibraries & Culture344380388Search in Google Scholar
Imbert, J. (1984). Passé, présent et avenir du doctorat en droit en France, Revue d’histoire des Facultés de droit, 1, 11–35. https://univ-droit.fr/docs/recherche/rhfd/pdf/01-1984/01-1984-p011-035.pdfImbertJ.1984Passé, présent et avenir du doctorat en droit en FranceRevue d’histoire des Facultés de droit11135https://univ-droit.fr/docs/recherche/rhfd/pdf/01-1984/01-1984-p011-035.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Jacsó, P. (2010). Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 34(1), 175–191.JacsóP.2010Metadata mega mess in Google ScholarOnline Information Review34117519110.1108/14684521011024191Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., Engels, T., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Duskova, M., Guns, R., Nowotniak, R., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G., Starčič, A., & Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 11(1), 463–486.KulczyckiE.EngelsT.PölönenJ.BruunK.DuskovaM.GunsR.NowotniakR.PetrM.SivertsenG.StarčičA.ZuccalaA.2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countriesScientometrics11146348610.1007/s11192-018-2711-0Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Engels, T.C.E., Rozkosz, E.A., Zuccala, A.A., Bruun, K., Eskola, O., Starčič, A.I., Petr, M., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven-country european study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, 1–15. doi:
10.1002/asi.24336KulczyckiE.GunsR.PölönenJ.EngelsT.C.E.RozkoszE.A.ZuccalaA.A.BruunK.EskolaO.StarčičA.I.PetrM.SivertsenG.2020Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven-country european studyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology202011510.1002/asi.24336768715233288998Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858–862.LarivièreV.GingrasY.ArchambaultÉ.2009The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60485886210.1002/asi.21011Search in Google Scholar
Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.NederhofA.J.2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A reviewScientometrics6618110010.1007/s11192-006-0007-2Search in Google Scholar
Orestano, R. (1987). Introduzione allo studio del diritto romano. Bologna: Il Mulino.OrestanoR.1987Introduzione allo studio del diritto romanoBolognaIl MulinoSearch in Google Scholar
Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J.W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen & J. Schneider (eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 9–24.PerssonO.DanellR.SchneiderJ.W.2009How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysisInÅströmF.DanellR.LarsenB.SchneiderJ.(eds.),Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthdayInternational Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics924Search in Google Scholar
Pichonnaz, P. (2014). Bibliométrie en droit: Quelques réflexions sur les enjeux et l’impact sur la littérature juridique future. Revue de droit suisse/Zeitschrift für Schweizer Recht, 133, 377–98.PichonnazP.2014Bibl iométrie en droit: Quelques réflexions sur les enjeux et l’impact sur la littérature juridique futureRevue de droit suisse/Zeitschrift für Schweizer Recht13337798Search in Google Scholar
Prins, A.A., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Wouters, P.F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270.PrinsA.A.CostasR.van LeeuwenT.N.WoutersP.F.2016Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science dataResearch Evaluation25326427010.1093/reseval/rvv049Search in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J. (2016). Framing “Law and Society” in the Roman World. In P. J. du Plessis, C. Ando, & Kaius Tuori (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society (pp. 8–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.2PölönenJ.2016Framing “Law and Society” in the Roman WorldIndu PlessisP. J.AndoC.TuoriKaius(eds.),The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society820OxfordOxford University Press10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Scharnhorst, A., & Garfield, E. (2010). Tracing scientific influence. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1010.3525.ScharnhorstA.GarfieldE.2010Tracing scientific influencearXiv Preprint arXiv:1010.3525.Search in Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (1997). Continuity and change in classical scholarship: A quantitative survey, 1924 to 1992. Ancient Society, 28, 265–89.ScheidelW.1997Continuity and change in classical scholarship: A quantitative survey, 1924 to 1992Ancient Society282658910.2143/AS.28.0.630079Search in Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1999). Roman law in European history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.SteinP.1999Roman law in European historyCambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511814723Search in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: A problematic relationship?. Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung, 2. http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/view/173. doi:
10.5283/bpf.173van LeeuwenT.2013Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: A problematic relationship?Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung2http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/view/17310.5283/bpf.173Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
