[Austin, John. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bate, Jonathan. 1994. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183242.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergs, Alexander. 2004. Letters: A new approach to text typology. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(2): 207–227.10.1075/jhp.5.2.04ber]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134.10.1177/0075424212472509]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024]Search in Google Scholar
[Carroll, Ruth, Matti Peikola, Hanna Salmi, Mari-Liisa Varila, Janne Skaffari and Risto Hiltunen. 2013. Pragmatics on the page. European Journal of English Studies 17(1): 54–71.10.1080/13825577.2013.755006]Search in Google Scholar
[Claridge, Claudia and Andrew Wilson. 2002. Style evolution in the English sermon. In T. Fanego, B. Méndez-Naya and E. Seoane (eds.). Sounds, words, texts and change: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL, 25–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.224.05cla]Search in Google Scholar
[Condren, Conal. 2016. The language of politics in seventeenth-century England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[CoRD | Helsinki Corpus (HC). 1991. Helsinki.fi. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/textcategories.html,]Search in Google Scholar
[Crystal, David. 2018. Shakespeare’s words.https://www.shakespeareswords.com,]Search in Google Scholar
[Crystal, David. 2012. Think on my words: Exploring Shakespeare’s language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139196994]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan. 2017. The influence of Italian manners on politeness in England, 1550–1620. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(2): 195–213.10.1075/jhp.00002.cul]Search in Google Scholar
[De Grazia, Margreta. 1980. The secularization of language in the seventeenth century. Journal of the History of Ideas 41(2): 319–329.10.2307/2709464]Search in Google Scholar
[De Montaigne, Michel. 1802. Essais. (Vol. 2: 10). Didot. (Original work published 1580).]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanego Teresa, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, Cristina Blanco-García and Iván Tamaredo. 2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41(1): 53–82.10.1515/icame-2017-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gotti, Maurizio. 2001. The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 221–239.10.1076/ejes.5.2.221.7307]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1973. Sidney’s ‘Arcadia’ and the mixed mode. Studies in Philology 70(3): 269–278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardie, Andrew. 2012. CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409.10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har]Search in Google Scholar
[Hope, Jonathan. 2014. Shakespeare and language: Reason, eloquence and artifice in the Renaissance. London: Bloomsbury.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hünig, Wolfgang K. 2003. Style labels in monolingual learner’s dictionaries. In G. Radden, H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven and K. Panther (eds.). Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 367–390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.243.23hun]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, Keith. 2014. Shakespeare’s English: A practical linguistic guide. Harlow: Pearson.10.4324/9781315833033]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, Keith. 2019. Shakespeare’s language: Perspectives past and present. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315303079]Search in Google Scholar
[Jorgensen, Paul A. 1954. Much ado about nothing. Shakespeare Quarterly 5(3): 287–295.10.2307/2866334]Search in Google Scholar
[Kytö, Merja. 1996 [1991]. 3rd edition. Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding conventions and lists of source texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kytö, Merja and Erik Smitterberg. 2015. English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In P. Shaw, B. Erman, G. Melchers and P. Sundkvist. (eds.). From clerks to corpora: Essays on the English language yesterday and today, 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.10.16993/bab.g]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, David Y.W. 2001. Genres, registers, text types, domain and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators 5(3): 37–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[McClain, Lisa. 2007. “They have taken away my Lord”: Mary Magdalene, Christ’s missing body, and the mass in Reformation England. The Sixteenth Century Journal 38(1): 77–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2001. Genre as a variable in sociohistorical linguistics. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 241–256.10.1076/ejes.5.2.241.7311]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Henry K. 1956. The paradoxical encomium with special reference to its vogue in England, 1600–1800. Modern Philology 53(3): 145–178.10.1086/389096]Search in Google Scholar
[Orr, Leah. 2011. Genre labels on the title pages of English fiction, 1660–1800. Philological Quarterly 90(1): 65–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raber, Karen. 2016. Fluid mechanics: Shakespeare’s subversive liquors. In D.B. Goldstein, and A.L. Tigner (eds.). Culinary Shakespeare: Staging food and drink in early modern England, 75–96. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.10.5325/j.ctv2321hsg.7]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravassat, Mireille and Jonathan Culpeper (eds.). 2011. Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary approaches. London: Continuum,]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmied, Josef and Claudia Claridge. 1997. Classifying text- or genre-variation in the Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Texts’. In R. Hickey, M. Kytö, I. Lancashire and M. Rissanen (ed.). Tracing the trail of time: Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop, 119–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shapiro, James. 2011. 1599: A year in the life of William Shakespeare. London: Faber & Faber.]Search in Google Scholar
[Slaughter, Mary M. 1982. Universal languages and scientific taxonomy in the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Winnie. 2017. Documenting categories in EEBO-TCP data [Blog post: May]. https://www.linguisticdna.org.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steen, Gerard. 1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes 28(2): 109–120.10.1080/01638539909545075]Search in Google Scholar
[Sullivan, Ceri. 2007. Disposable elements? Indications of genre in early modern titles. The Modern Language Review 102(3): 641–653.10.2307/20467425]Search in Google Scholar
[Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001a. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150.10.1076/ejes.5.2.139.7309]Search in Google Scholar
[Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001b. Middle English recipes: Genre characteristics, text type features and underlying traditions of writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(1): 85–113.10.1075/jhp.2.1.05taa]Search in Google Scholar
[Taavitsainen, Irma. 2017. The essay in Early Modern and Late Modern English medical writing. Recherches anglaises et nord américaines (RANAM) 50: 15–30.10.3406/ranam.2017.1545]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, Gary, John Jowett, Terri Bourus and Gabriel Egan. 2017. The new Oxford Shakespeare: Critical reference edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198759560.book.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Toolan, Michael. 2008. Narrative progression in the short story: First steps in a corpus stylistic approach. Narrative 16(2): 105–120.10.1353/nar.0.0000]Search in Google Scholar
[Woodbridge, Linda. 2003. Jest books, the literature of roguery, and the vagrant poor in Renaissance England. English Literary Renaissance 33: 201–210.10.1111/1475-6757.00025]Search in Google Scholar