This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Chodakowska, E., & Nazarko, J. (2017). Network DEA Models for Evaluating Couriers and Messengers. Procedia Engineering, 182, 106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.130ChodakowskaE.NazarkoJ.2017Network DEA Models for Evaluating Couriers and Messengers18210611110.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.130Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ceicyte, J. (2019). Implementing responsible innovation at the firm level. Kaunas, Lithuania: Kaunas University of Technology.CeicyteJ.2019Kaunas, LithuaniaKaunas University of TechnologySearch in Google Scholar
Ejdys, J., & Nazarko, Ł. (2014). Foresight gospodarczy - instrumentem orientacji na przyszłość [Economic foresight as an instrument of a future-oriented strategy]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 340, 651–664.EjdysJ.NazarkoŁ.2014Foresight gospodarczy - instrumentem orientacji na przyszłość[Economic foresight as an instrument of a future-oriented strategy]34065166410.15611/pn.2014.340.58Search in Google Scholar
Ejdys, J., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, L., & Halicka, K. (2015). Foresight application for transport sector. In M. Fiorini (Ed.), Clean Mobility and Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 379–402). London, Great Britain: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. doi: 10.1049/PBTR001E_ch17EjdysJ.NazarkoJ.NazarkoL.HalickaK.2015Foresight application for transport sectorFioriniM.(Ed.),379402London, Great BritainThe Institution of Engineering and Technology10.1049/PBTR001E_ch17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Flipse, S. M., Van Dam, K. H., Stragier, J., Oude Vrielink, T. J. C., & Van der Sanden, M. C. A. (2015). Operationalizing responsible research innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice. Journal of Chain and Network, 15(2), 135–146. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x004FlipseS. M.Van DamK. H.StragierJ.Oude VrielinkT. J. C.Van der SandenM. C. A.2015Operationalizing responsible research innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice15213514610.3920/JCNS2015.x004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Genus, A., & Iskandarova, M. (2018). Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.029GenusA.IskandarovaM.2018Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique1281910.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Geoghegan-Quinn, M. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Proceedings of the Science in Dialogues - Towards a European Model for Responsible Research and Innovation. Odense, Denmark, 23–35.Geoghegan-QuinnM.2012Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Proceedings of the Science in Dialogues - Towards a European Model for Responsible Research and InnovationOdense, Denmark2335Search in Google Scholar
Gianni, R. (2016). Responsibility and Freedom. The Ethical Realm of RRI. London and Hoboken: ISTE and John Wiley & Sons.GianniR.2016London and HobokenISTE and John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781119277354Search in Google Scholar
Goepel, K. D. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHPOS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469–487. doi: 10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590GoepelK. D.2018Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHPOS)10346948710.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Grinbaum, A., & Groves, C. (2013) What is “responsible” about “responsible innovation”? In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 119–142). Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.GrinbaumA.GrovesC.2013What is “responsible” about “responsible innovation”?OwenR.BessantJ.HeintzM.(Eds.),119142Chichester, Great BritainJohn Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118551424.ch7Search in Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 10, 9–31.GrunwaldA.2011Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS research10931Search in Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swiestra, B. J. Koops, & H. A. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1 (pp. 15–31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.GrunwaldA.2014Technology assessment for responsible innovationvan den HovenJ.DoornN.SwiestraT.KoopsB. J.RomijnH. A.(Eds.),1531Dordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringer10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_2Search in Google Scholar
Gurzawska, A., Mäkinen, M., & Brey, P. (2017). Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) practices in industry: Providing the right incentives. Sustainability, 9(10), 1759. doi: 10.3390/su9101759GurzawskaA.MäkinenM.BreyP.2017Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) practices in industry: Providing the right incentives910175910.3390/su9101759Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halicka, K. (2017). Main Concepts of Technology Analysis in the Light of the Literature on the Subject. Procedia Engineering, 182, 191–298. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.196HalickaK.2017Main Concepts of Technology Analysis in the Light of the Literature on the Subject18219129810.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.196Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halme, M., & Korpela, M. (2014). Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: a resource perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 547–566. doi: 10.1002/bse.1801HalmeM.KorpelaM.2014Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: a resource perspective23854756610.1002/bse.1801Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hedstrom, G. S. (2019). Sustainability: What It Is and How to Measure It. Boston-Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781547400423-202HedstromG. S.2019Boston-BerlinWalter de Gruyter10.1515/9781547400423-202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Inzelt, A., & Csonka, L. (2017). The Approach of the Business Sector to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Foresight and STI Governance, 11(4), 63–73. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.63.73InzeltA.CsonkaL.2017The Approach of the Business Sector to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)114637310.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.63.73Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
KARIM (2014). Introduction to a guide to entrepreneurs and innovation support organization. Retrieved from http://www.nweurope.eu/media/1118/guide_online.pdfKARIM2014Retrieved from http://www.nweurope.eu/media/1118/guide_online.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Kuhlman, S., Stegmaier, P., & Konrad, K. (2019). The tentative governance of emerging science and technology — A conceptual introduction. Research Policy, 48(5), 1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006KuhlmanS.StegmaierP.KonradK.2019The tentative governance of emerging science and technology — A conceptual introduction4851091109710.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
MoRRI (2018). The evolution of Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe: The MoRRI indicators report. Retrieved from https://morri.netlify.com/MoRRI2018Retrieved from https://morri.netlify.com/Search in Google Scholar
Nazarko, J., Kuźmicz, K. A., Szubzda-Prutis, E., & Urban, J. (2009). The General Concept of Benchmarking and Its Application in Higher Education in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3&4), 497–510.NazarkoJ.KuźmiczK. A.Szubzda-PrutisE.UrbanJ.2009The General Concept of Benchmarking and Its Application in Higher Education in Europe343&449751010.1080/03797720903356677Search in Google Scholar
Nazarko, J., Radziszewski, R., Dębkowska, K., Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kilon, J., Kononiuk, A., Kowalski, K. J., Król, J. B., Nazarko, Ł., Sarnowski, M., & Vilutienė, T. (2015). Foresight Study of Road Pavement Technologies. Procedia Engineering, 122, 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.016NazarkoJ.RadziszewskiR.DębkowskaK.EjdysJ.GudanowskaA.HalickaK.KilonJ.KononiukA.KowalskiK. J.KrólJ. B.NazarkoŁ.SarnowskiM.VilutienėT.2015Foresight Study of Road Pavement Technologies12212913610.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nazarko, L. (2019). Responsible Research and Innovation – a Conceptual Contribution to Theory and Practice of Technology Management. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 342–351. doi: 10.3846/btp.2019.32NazarkoL.2019Responsible Research and Innovation – a Conceptual Contribution to Theory and Practice of Technology Management2034235110.3846/btp.2019.32Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OECD (2015). Daejeon Declaration on Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies for the Global and Digital Age. OECD Ministerial Meeting Daejeon 2015, World Science Forum. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/daejeon-declaration-2015.htmOECD2015OECD Ministerial Meeting Daejeon 2015, World Science ForumRetrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/daejeon-declaration-2015.htmSearch in Google Scholar
OECD (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. Paris. doi:10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-enOECD2016Paris10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Owen, R., Stigloe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 27–50). Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.OwenR.StigloeJ.MacnaghtenP.GormanM.FisherE.GustonD.2013A framework for responsible innovationOwenR.BessantJ.HeintzM.(Eds.),2750Chichester, Great BritainJohn Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118551424.ch2Search in Google Scholar
Pavie, X., & Carthy, D. (2013). Responsible-innovation in practice: How to implement responsibility across an organization. Cahier Innovation & Society, 33.PavieX.CarthyD.2013Responsible-innovation in practice: How to implement responsibility across an organization33Search in Google Scholar
Pavie, X., Scholten, V., & Carthy, D. (2014). Responsible innovation: From concept to practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.PavieX.ScholtenV.CarthyD.2014SingaporeWorld Scientific Publishing10.1142/8903Search in Google Scholar
ResAgorA (2016). Responsibility Navigator. Retrieved from https://responsibility-navigator.eu/navigator/ResAgorA2016Retrieved from https://responsibility-navigator.eu/navigator/Search in Google Scholar
Rohrbeck, R. (2011). Corporate Foresight: Towards a Maturity Model for the Future Orientation of a Firm. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.RohrbeckR.2011Berlin HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-7908-2626-5Search in Google Scholar
RRI Tools (undated). Self-Reflection Tool. Retrieved from https://www.rri-tools.eu/self-reflection-toolRRI Tools(undated)Retrieved from https://www.rri-tools.eu/self-reflection-toolSearch in Google Scholar
Stahl, B. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 708–716. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct067StahlB.2013Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework40670871610.1093/scipol/sct067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stahl, B. C. (2017). The ORBIT Self-Assessment Tool. ORBIT Journal, 1(2). doi: 10.29297/orbit.v1i2.59StahlB. C.2017The ORBIT Self-Assessment Tool1210.29297/orbit.v1i2.59Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stahl, B. C., Obach, M., Yaghmaei, E., Ikonen, V., Chatfield, K., & Brem, A. (2017). The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice. Sustainability, 9(6), 1–19. doi: 10.3390/su9061036StahlB. C.ObachM.YaghmaeiE.IkonenV.ChatfieldK.BremA.2017The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice9611910.3390/su9061036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stigloe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework from responsible innovation. Research policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008StigloeJ.OwenR.MacnaghtenP.2013Developing a framework from responsible innovation4291568158010.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, H. (2000). A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdfSutcliffeH.2000Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., Flipse, S., Klaassen, P., Scholten, V., & Yaghmaei, E. (2017). Company Strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A Conceptual Model. Sustainability, 9(11), 2045. doi: 10.3390/su9112045van de PoelI.AsveldL.FlipseS.KlaassenP.ScholtenV.YaghmaeiE.2017Company Strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A Conceptual Model911204510.3390/su9112045Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van den Hoven, M. J., Lokhorst, G., & van de Poel, I. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9277-zvan den HovenM. J.LokhorstG.van de PoelI.2012Engineering and the problem of moral overload1811310.1007/s11948-011-9277-z327572121533834Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value sensitive design and responsible innvation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & H. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 75–83). London, Great Britain: John Wiley.van den HovenJ.2013Value sensitive design and responsible innvationOwenR.BessantJ.HeintzH.(Eds.),7583London, Great BritainJohn Wiley10.1002/9781118551424.ch4Search in Google Scholar
van den Hoven, J. (2014). Responsible Innovation: A new look at technology ethics. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swiestra, B. J. Koops, & H. A. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1 (pp. 3–13). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.van den HovenJ.2014Responsible Innovation: A new look at technology ethicsvan den HovenJ.DoornN.SwiestraT.KoopsB. J.RomijnH. A.(Eds.),313Dordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringer10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_1Search in Google Scholar
von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp, & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren (pp. 39–61). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.von SchombergR.2012Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovationDusseldorpM.BeecroftR.(Eds.),3961WiesbadenVS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2Search in Google Scholar
von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & H. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 51–74). London, Great Britain: John Wiley.von SchombergR.2013A vision of responsible innovationOwenR.BessantJ.HeintzH.(Eds.),5174London, Great BritainJohn Wiley10.1002/9781118551424.ch3Search in Google Scholar
Wilford, S. H. (2015). What is required of requirements? A first stage process towards developing guidelines for responsible research. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 348–355. doi: 10.1145/2874239.2874291WilfordS. H.2015What is required of requirements? A first stage process towards developing guidelines for responsible research45334835510.1145/2874239.2874291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar