The Unificatory Power of Scientific Realism

Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2010. The no-miracles argument: inference to an unacceptable explanation. Philosophy of Science 77 (1): 35–58.10.1086/650207Search in Google Scholar

Hendry, Robin. 2001. Are realism and instrumentalism methodologically indifferent? Philosophy of Science 68 (Proceedings): S25–S37.10.1086/392895Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ladyman, James. 1999. Review of Leplin’s A Novel Defense of Scientiic Realism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1): 181–188.10.1093/bjps/50.1.181Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lange, Marc. 2002. Baseball, pessimistic inductions and the turnover fallacy. Analysis 62 (4): 2881–2885.10.1093/analys/62.4.281Search in Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientiic Growth. California: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1981. A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 48 (1): 19–49.10.1086/288975Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leplin, Jarrett. 1997. A Novel Defense of Scientiic Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, Timothy. 2003. Explaining the success of a scientific theory. Philosophy of Science 70 (5): 891–901.10.1086/377375Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mach, Ernst. 1911. History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Translated by P. E. B. Jourdain. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, Margaret. 1990. Unification, realism, and inference. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (3): 305–332.10.1093/bjps/41.3.305Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Musgrave, Alan. 1988. The ultimate argument for scientific realism. In Relativism and Realism in Science, edited by Robert Nola. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 229–252.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2001. Scientiic Realism vs. Scientiic Antirealism. PhD Dissertation. University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2011a. A confutation of the pessimistic induction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (1): 75–84.10.1007/s10838-010-9130-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2011b. Coherence of our best scientific theories. Foundations of Science 16 (1): 21–30.10.1007/s10699-010-9198-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2015. Explanatory failures of relative realism. Epistemologia 38 (1): 16–28.10.3280/EPIS2015-001002Search in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2016a. Extensional scientific realism vs. intensional scientific realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 59: 46–52.10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2016b. Refutations of the two pessimistic inductions. Philosophia 44 (3): 835–844.10.1007/s11406-016-9733-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2016c. Why should we be pessimistic about antirealists and pessimists? Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9490-y.10.1007/s10699-016-9490-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. 2017. The uniformity principle vs. the disuniformity principle. Acta Analytica 32 (2): 213–222.10.1007/s12136-016-0302-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park, Seungbae. Forthcoming. Scientific antirealists have set fire to their own houses. Prolegomena.Search in Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri. 1905/1952. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1975. Mathematics, Matter and Method (Philosophical Papers, vo. 1), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientiic Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198248601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wray, K. Brad. 2007. A selectionist explanation for the success and failures of science. Erkenntnis 67 (1): 81–89.10.1007/s10670-007-9046-1Search in Google Scholar