<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Boosting the local economic growth and cohesion policy may be supported by using the public intervention. The local governments may benefit directly and indirectly from the place-based policy implemented as Special Economic Zones (SEZ). SEZ directly increase the employment and the number of firms, while, indirectly, they can raise the local public sector financial performance in the long run by increasing revenues from personal and corporate income taxes. This article assesses the efficiency of this policy at the local level in the context of an institutional environment and inter-agent local diffusion. It also uses the statistical methodology based on the comparison of the empirical density distributions of the economic and financial indicators within the institutional groups to detect the global shift or divergence or convergence patterns. This article examines the Polish experience of public intervention in 1995–2016 with 14 SEZ located in more than 350 different locations. It proves that in general, the financial and economic situation of the municipalities with SEZ did not improve. An institutional analysis of the SEZ operating conditions indicates that the weak operating requirements for SEZ firms together with a poor location cannot constitute a catalyst for local development.</p></abstract>

Boosting the local economic growth and cohesion policy may be supported by using the public intervention. The local governments may benefit directly and indirectly from the place-based policy implemented as Special Economic Zones (SEZ). SEZ directly increase the employment and the number of firms, while, indirectly, they can raise the local public sector financial performance in the long run by increasing revenues from personal and corporate income taxes. This article assesses the efficiency of this policy at the local level in the context of an institutional environment and inter-agent local diffusion. It also uses the statistical methodology based on the comparison of the empirical density distributions of the economic and financial indicators within the institutional groups to detect the global shift or divergence or convergence patterns. This article examines the Polish experience of public intervention in 1995–2016 with 14 SEZ located in more than 350 different locations. It proves that in general, the financial and economic situation of the municipalities with SEZ did not improve. An institutional analysis of the SEZ operating conditions indicates that the weak operating requirements for SEZ firms together with a poor location cannot constitute a catalyst for local development.

Can public intervention improve local public sector economic performance? The analysis of Special Economic Zones in Poland

Central European Economic Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Boosting the local economic growth and cohesion policy may be supported by using the public intervention. The local governments may benefit directly and...

Can public intervention improve local public sector economic performance? The analysis of Special Economic Zones in Poland

Data publikacji: 06 cze 2020

Zakres stron: 221 - 245

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2019-0019

Słowa kluczowe
public intervention, public finance, spatial development, cohesion policy, Special Economic Zones

© 2019 Katarzyna Kopczewska, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Can public intervention improve local public sector economic performance? The analysis of Special Economic Zones in Poland

Data publikacji: 06 cze 2020

Zakres stron: 221 - 245

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2019-0019

Słowa kluczowepublic intervention, public finance, spatial development, cohesion policy, Special Economic Zones

© 2019 Katarzyna Kopczewska, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
public intervention, public finance, spatial development, cohesion policy, Special Economic Zones