<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A central concern for any U.S. presidential administration is its relationship with the federal judiciary. For an administration, this relationship is potentially legacy making or breaking in two ways. First, what is the imprint that the administration leaves on the judiciary? Will a president have the opportunities and institutional capacity to change the political balance of the federal judiciary? Second, how will the judicial branch respond when the administration’s policy plans are, as many inevitably will be, challenged in the court system? Will the administration’s policy preferences be preserved and its agenda advanced, or will court decisions stymie important initiatives and restrict that agenda? This paper examines these questions with regard to the Obama administration’s record. The Obama era saw new levels of diversity in terms of judicial nominees and the courts did sometimes uphold key aspects of the Obama administration’s program to the chagrin of conservative opponents. Yet, with the benefit of two years hindsight, the evidence suggests that the Obama administration’s legacy with regard to both the central questions addressed in the paper was a diminished one. The administration’s capacity to reorient the federal bench was thwarted by the legislative branch, notably obstruction in Senate, with the consequences of that frustration highlighted by the rapid actions taken by the Trump administration and Senate Republicans in 2017–18. Furthermore, on balance, the decisions made by the federal judiciary on matters of significant concern to the Obama White House weakened rather than strengthened the administration’s legacy.</p></abstract>

A central concern for any U.S. presidential administration is its relationship with the federal judiciary. For an administration, this relationship is potentially legacy making or breaking in two ways. First, what is the imprint that the administration leaves on the judiciary? Will a president have the opportunities and institutional capacity to change the political balance of the federal judiciary? Second, how will the judicial branch respond when the administration’s policy plans are, as many inevitably will be, challenged in the court system? Will the administration’s policy preferences be preserved and its agenda advanced, or will court decisions stymie important initiatives and restrict that agenda? This paper examines these questions with regard to the Obama administration’s record. The Obama era saw new levels of diversity in terms of judicial nominees and the courts did sometimes uphold key aspects of the Obama administration’s program to the chagrin of conservative opponents. Yet, with the benefit of two years hindsight, the evidence suggests that the Obama administration’s legacy with regard to both the central questions addressed in the paper was a diminished one. The administration’s capacity to reorient the federal bench was thwarted by the legislative branch, notably obstruction in Senate, with the consequences of that frustration highlighted by the rapid actions taken by the Trump administration and Senate Republicans in 2017–18. Furthermore, on balance, the decisions made by the federal judiciary on matters of significant concern to the Obama White House weakened rather than strengthened the administration’s legacy.

A Legacy Diminished: President Obama and the Courts

British Journal of American Legal Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"A Legacy Diminished: President Obama and the Courts"}

A central concern for any U.S. presidential administration is its relationship with the federal judiciary. For an administration, this relationship is...

		Eight Years	Final Two Years	Percent of Total
Reagan	CA	83	17	20%
	District	290	66	23%
Clinton	CA	66	16	24%
	District	305	57	19%
Bush 2	CA	60	10	17%
	District	261	58	22%
Obama	CA	55	2	4%
	District	268	18	7%

A Legacy Diminished: President Obama and the Courts

Data publikacji: 31 gru 2019

Zakres stron: 419 - 440

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjals-2019-0008

Słowa kluczowe
Obama, Supreme Court, Federal Judiciary, Presidential Legacy

© 2019 Clodagh Harrington et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Final-Two-Year Court of Appeals (CA) and District Confirmations.

A Legacy Diminished: President Obama and the Courts

Data publikacji: 31 gru 2019

Zakres stron: 419 - 440

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjals-2019-0008

Słowa kluczoweObama, Supreme Court, Federal Judiciary, Presidential Legacy

© 2019 Clodagh Harrington et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Final-Two-Year Court of Appeals (CA) and District Confirmations.

Słowa kluczowe
Obama, Supreme Court, Federal Judiciary, Presidential Legacy