Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Obtained from 3-Dimensional Rabbit Mandible Model: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study

1. Martini L, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R: Sheep model in orthopedic research: A literature review. Comparative Med 2001, 51(4): 292-299.Search in Google Scholar

2. Neyt JGV, Buckwalter JA, Carroll NC: Use of animal models in musculoskeletal research. Iowa Orthop J 1998, 18: 119-123.Search in Google Scholar

3. Campillo VE, Langonnet S, Pierrefeu A, Chaux-Bodard AG: Anatomic and histological study of the rabbit mandible as an experimental model for wound healing and surgical therapies. Lab Anim 2014, 48(4): 273-277.10.1177/002367721454063524951506Search in Google Scholar

4. Akbulut Y, Demiraslan Y, Gürbüz İ, Aslan K: The effect of gender factor on the mandible morphometry in the New Zealand Rabbit. FÜ Sağ Bil Vet Derg 2014, 28(1): 15-18.Search in Google Scholar

5. Monfared AL: Applied anatomy of the rabbit’s skull and its clinical application during regional anesthesia. Glob Vet 2013, 10(6): 653-657.Search in Google Scholar

6. Salih QM: Morphological and morphometric study of the mandible in the local rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus). Iraqi J Vet Sci 2016, 40(1): 25-29.10.30539/iraqijvm.v40i1.134Search in Google Scholar

7. El-Bialy T, El-Shamy I, Graber TM: Growth modification of the rabbit mandible using therapeutic ultrasound: Is it possible to enhance functional appliance results? Angle Orthod 2003, 73(6): 631-639.Search in Google Scholar

8. Borie E, Calzzani R, Dias FJ, Fuentes R, Salamanca C: Morphometry of Rabbit anatomical regions used as experimental models in implantology and oral surgery. Biomed Res 2017, 28(12): 5468-5472.Search in Google Scholar

9. Valdivia GI, Tallon WV, Carvalho LP, Lozano LV, Manzanares CMC: Mandible measurements and dental midline deviation after alveolar nerve transection in growing rabbits. Int J Morphol 2011, 29(1): 52-56.10.4067/S0717-95022011000100008Search in Google Scholar

10. Jiang Y, Zhao J, White DL, Genant HK: Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact 2000, 1: 45-51.Search in Google Scholar

11. Estai M, Bunt S: Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat 2016, 208: 151-157.10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.01026996541Search in Google Scholar

12. Kim M, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC: Evaluation of accuracy of 3D reconstruction images using multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 2012, 42: 25-33.10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.25331483422474645Search in Google Scholar

13. Stull KE, Tise ML, Ali Z, Fowler DR: Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images. Forensic Sci Int 2014, 238: 133-140.10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.00524713466Search in Google Scholar

14. Viecilli R, Katona T, Roberts W: Optimization of µCT data processing for modelling of dental structures in orthodontic studies. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2007, 10(4): 257-263.10.1080/1025584070130395017671859Search in Google Scholar

15. Driesch AVD: A Guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Pea body Museum Bulletin 1. Harward University, Massachusetts, 1976, 52-64.Search in Google Scholar

16. Azer SA, Azer S: 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: A review of the quality of the literature. Health Professions Education 2016, 2: 80-98.10.1016/j.hpe.2016.05.002Search in Google Scholar

17. Murgitroyd E, Madurska M, Gozalez J, Watson A: 3D digital anatomy modelling -Practical or pretty? Surgeon 2015, 13: 177-180.10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.00725593105Search in Google Scholar

18. Özkadif S, Eken E: Contribution of virtual anatomic models to medical education. Atatü rk Ü niversitesi Vet Bil Derg 2015, 10(1): 46-54.10.17094/avbd.77980Search in Google Scholar