[AVERY, T. E. and H. E. BURKHART (2002): Forest measurements. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill. New York, N.Y. 456 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[BALDWIN JR., V. C., K. D. PETERSON, A. CLARK III, R. B. FERGUSON, M. R. STRUB and D. R. BOWER (2000): The effects of spacing and thinning on stand and tree characteristics of 38-year-old loblolly pine. For. Ecol. and Manag. 137: 91-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[BUFORD, M. A. and H. E. BURKHART (1987): Genetic improvement effects on growth and yield of loblolly pine plantations. For. Sci. 33: 707-724.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURDON, R. D. (1975): Compression wood in Pinus radiata clones on four different sites. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 5: 152-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[FALCONER, D. S. and T. F. C. MACKAY (1996): Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Prentice Hall. Essex, England. 464 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS, S. J. WELHAM and R. THOMPSON (2002): ASReml User Guide Release 1.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[GOEBEL, N. B. and J. R. WARNER (1966): Volume tables for small diameter loblolly, shortleaf and Virginia pine in the upper South Carolina piedmont. Forest Research Series No. 7. Clemson University. Clemson, South Carolina.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISIK, F., K. ISIK and S. J. LEE (1999): Genetic variation in Pinus brutia in Turkey: I. Growth, Biomass and Stem Quality Traits. For. Gene. 6: 89-99.]Search in Google Scholar
[LARSON, P. R. (1963): Stem form development of forest trees. Vol. 5. Society of American Foresters. Washington, DC. 42 p.10.1093/forestscience/9.s2.a0001]Search in Google Scholar
[LOEHLE, C. and G. NAMKOONG (1987): Constraints on tree breeding: Growth tradeoffs, growth strategies, and defense investments. For. Sci. 33: 1089-1097.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCKEAND, S. E., E. J. JOKELA, D. A. HUBER, T. D. BYRAM, H. LEE ALLEN, B. LI and T. J. MULLIN (2006): Performance of improved genotypes of loblolly pine across different soils, climates, and silvicultural inputs. For. Ecol. and Manag. 227: 178-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAGNUSSEN, S. (1995): The impact of genetic variation in relative growth rates on stem volume differentiation: a simulation study. Silvae Genet. 44: 194-205.]Search in Google Scholar
[MATZIRIS, D. I. (2000): Genetic variation and realized genetic gain from Aleppo pine tree improvement. Silvae Genet. 49: 5-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[NEWBERRY, J. D. and H. E. BURKHART (1986): Variableform stem profile models for loblolly pine. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 109-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[PEDERICK, L. A. (1970): Variation and inheritance of stem form and bark thickness in young loblolly pine. Technical Report 41. School of Forest Resources, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC. 44 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS-INSTITUTE (2004): SAS Version 9 Cary, NC. SAS Institute, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[SHELBOURNE, C. J. A. (1972): Genotype-environment interaction: Its study and its implications in forest tree improvement. P. 1-28 in Proc. of IUFRO Genetics. Tokyo, Japan.]Search in Google Scholar
[SHERRILL, J. R. (2005): Genetic and cultural effects on stem taper and bark thickness in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Ms Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 91p.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIERRA-LUCERO, V., S. E. MCKEAND, D. A. HUBER, D. L. ROCKWOOD and T. L. WHITE (2002): Performance differences and genetic parameters for four coastal provenances of loblolly pine in the Southeastern United States. For. Sci. 48: 732-742.]Search in Google Scholar
[SPURR, S. H. (1952): Forest Inventory. Ronald Press Co. New York, NY. 476 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[SVENSSON, J. C., S. E. MCKEAND, H. L. ALLEN and R. G. CAMPBELL (1999): Genetic variation in height and volume of loblolly pine open-pollinated families during canopy closure. Silvae Genet. 48: 204-207.]Search in Google Scholar
[YAMADA, Y. (1962): Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlation of the same trait under different environments. Jap. J. Genet. 37: 498-509.]Search in Google Scholar
