[Aditya G., Pal S., Saha G.K. 2010. An assessment of fish species assemblages in rice fields in West Bengal, India: implications for management. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 26, 4: 535-539.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ali S., Ripley S. D. 1980. Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan. Vol. 1-10. Oxford University Press. New Delhi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson D.L. 2001. Landscape Heterogeneity and Diurnal Raptor Diversity in Honduras: The Role of Indigenous Shifting Cultivation. Biotropica 33, 3: 511-519.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker J., French K., Whelan R. J. 2002. The edge effect and ecotonal species: bird communities across a natural edge in south eastern Australia. Ecology, 83, 11: 3048-3059.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bassi N., Kumar M.D., Sharma A., Pardha-Saradhi P. 2014. Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2: 1-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[BirdLife International. 2018. State of the world’s birds: taking the pulse of the planet. Cambridge, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradford D.F., Franson S.E., Neale A.C., Heggem D.T., Miller G.R., Canterbury G.E. 1998. Bird species assemblages as indicators of biological integrity in Great Basin rangeland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 49, 1: 1-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brook B.W., Sodhi N.S., Ng P.K. 2003. Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424, 6947: 420.]Search in Google Scholar
[Canterbury G.E., Martin T.E., Petit D.R., Petit L.J., Bradford D.F. 2000. Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conservation Biology 14, 2: 544-558.]Search in Google Scholar
[Census of West Bengal and Kolkata data. 2011. Directorate of Census Operations in West Bengal, Govt of West Bengal, India. Source: http://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/west+bengal.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[chand Gupta R., Kaushik T.K. 2012. Traditional rural wetlands in Haryana state of India are currently confronting multicornered threats leading to extinction sooner than later. Journal of Tropical Life Science 2, 2: 32-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chatterjee A., Adhikari S., Barik A., Mukhopadhyay S.K. 2013. The mid-winter assemblage and diversity of bird populations at Patlakhawa Protected Forest, Coochbehar, West Bengal, India. Ring 35, 1: 31-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chester E.T., Robson B.J. 2013. Anthropogenic refuges for freshwater biodiversity: their ecological characteristics and management. Biological Conservation 166: 64-75.10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Colwell M.A., Dodd S.L. 1995. Waterbird communities and habitat relationships in coastal pastures of northern California. Conservation Biology 9, 4: 827-834.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C., LaRoe E.T. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service.10.5962/bhl.title.4108]Search in Google Scholar
[Cunningham S.A., Attwood S.J., Bawa K.S., Benton T.G., Broadhurst L.M., Didham R.K., McIntyre S., Perfecto I., Samways M.J., Tscharntke T., Vandermeer J. 2013. To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 173: 20-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dale S. 2018. Urban bird community composition influenced by size of urban green spaces, presence of native forest, and urbanization. Urban Ecosystems 21, 1: 1-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[DeLuca W.V., Studds C.E., Rockwood L.L., Marra P.P. 2004. Influence of land use on the integrity of marsh bird communities of Chesapeake Bay, USA. Wetlands 24, 4: 837-847.]Search in Google Scholar
[Den Boer P.J. 1968. Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta biotheoretica 18, 1-4: 165-194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Devictor V., Julliard R., Clavel J., Jiguet F., Lee A., Couvet D. 2008. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global ecology and biogeography 17, 2: 252-261.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donald P.F., Sanderson F.J., Burfield I.J., Van Bommel F.P. 2006. Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 116, 3-4: 189-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dudgeon D. 2003. The contribution of scientific information to the conservation and management of freshwater biodiversity in tropical Asia. In: Aquatic Biodiversity. Dordrecht, pp. 295-314.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunford W., Freemark K. 2005. Matrix matters: effects of surrounding land uses on forest birds near Ottawa, Canada. Landscape Ecology 20, 5: 497-511.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durán A.P., Duffy J.P., Gaston K.J. 2014. Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 1792: 20141529.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elphick C.S. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetland habitats. Conservation biology 14, 1: 181-191.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fahrig L. 2013. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography 40, 9: 1649-1663.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fahrig L., Baudry J., Brotons L., Burel F.G., Crist T.O., Fuller R.J., Sirami C., Siriwardena G.M.,Martin J.L. 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology letters 14,2: 101-112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fasola M. 1997. Rice farming and waterbirds: integrated management in an artificial landscape. Farming and birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and its implications for bird conservation, pp. 210-235.]Search in Google Scholar
[Findlay C.S., Bourdages J. 2000. Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology 14, 1: 86-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser L.H., Keddy P.A. (Eds). 2005. The world’s largest wetlands: ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511542091]Search in Google Scholar
[Frolking S., Yeluripati J.B., Douglas E. 2006. New district-level maps of rice cropping in India: a foundation for scientific input into policy assessment. Field Crops Research 98, 2-3: 164-177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaston A.J. 1984. Is habitat destruction in India and Pakistan beginning to affect the status of endemic passerine birds?. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 81, 3: 636-641.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gavareski C.A. 1976. Relation of park size and vegetation to urban bird populations in Seattle, Washington. Condor 78, 3: 375-382.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodale E., Kotagama S.W., Raman T.S., Sidhu S., Goodale U., Parker S., Chen J. 2014. The response of birds and mixed-species bird flocks to human-modified landscapes in Sri Lanka and southern India. Forest ecology and management. 329: 384-392.10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregory R. D., Gibbons D.W., Donald, P. F. 2004. Bird census and survey techniques. Bird Ecology and Conservation: 17-5610.1093/acprof:oso/9780198520863.003.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimmett R., Inskipp C., Inskipp T. 2011. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press and Christopher Helm. London]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanski I. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. Journal of Biogeography 42, 5: 989-993.]Search in Google Scholar
[HBW and BirdLife International. 2017. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 2 Available at: http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_Version_2.zip [.xls zipped 1 MB].]Search in Google Scholar
[Indian Institute of Technology. 2011. Trends in Agriculture and Agricultural Practices in Ganga Basin: An Overview. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, report code: 015_GBP_IIT_SE_ANL_01_Ver1_Dec2011]Search in Google Scholar
[IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-3. Available at www.iucnredlist.org]Search in Google Scholar
[Jullien M., Thiollay J.M., 1996. Effects of rain forest disturbance and fragmentation: comparative changes of the raptor community along natural and human-made gradients in French Guiana. Journal of Biogeography 23, 1: 7-25.10.1046/j.1365-2699.1996.00963.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamp J., Urazaliev R., Donald P.F., Hölzel N. 2011. Post-Soviet agricultural change predicts future declines after recent recovery in Eurasian steppe bird populations. Biological conservation 144, 11: 2607-2614.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kazmierczak K. 2000. A field guide to the birds of India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives. Om Book Service. New Delhi]Search in Google Scholar
[Koh L.P., Gardner T. A. 2010. Conservation in human modified landscapes. In: Sodhi N.S., Ehrlich P.R. (Eds). Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 236–26110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554232.003.0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Koh L.P., Wilcove D.S. 2008. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation letters 1, 2: 60-6410.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00011.x]Search in Google Scholar
[KS Gopi S. 2009. Are rice paddies suboptimal breeding habitat for Sarus Cranes in Uttar Pradesh, India? Condor 111, 4: 611-623.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kumar M.D., Sivamohan M.V.K., Bassi N. 2012. Technology choices and institutions for improving the economic and livelihood benefits from multiple-use tanks in western Odisha. In: Water management, food security and sustainable agriculture in developing economies. Routledge. pp. 158-183.10.4324/9780203104873-16]Search in Google Scholar
[Kupfer J.A., Malanson G.P., Franklin S.B., 2006. Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Global ecology and bio-geography 15, 1: 8-20.10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00204.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Laska M.S. 1997. Structure of Understory Shrub Assemblages in Adjacent Secondary and Old Growth Tropical Wet Forests, Costa Rica 1. Biotropica 29, 1: 29-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Law B.S., Dickman C.R. 1998. The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity & Conservation 7, 3: 323-333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levins R., Culver D. 1971. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68, 6: 1246-1248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maeda T. 2001. Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecological research 16, 3: 569-585.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mandal J., Shankar Raman T.R. 2016. Shifting agriculture supports more tropical forest birds than oil palm or teak plantations in Mizoram, northeast India. Condor 118, 2: 345-359.]Search in Google Scholar
[McAleece N. 1997. Biodiversity pro. Available from http://www.sams.ac.uk/research/software/research/software/bdpro.zip.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newbold T., Hudson L.N., Hill S.L., Contu S., Lysenko I., Senior R.A., Börger L., Bennett D.J., Choimes A., Collen B., Day J. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 7545: 45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Odum, E. P. 1958. Fundamentals of ecology. Second edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA]Search in Google Scholar
[Odum E. P., Barrett G. W. 2005. Fundamentals of ecology. Belmont, CA, pp. 38-41]Search in Google Scholar
[Parasharya B. M., Borad C. K., Mukherjee A. R. 2006. Factors associated with population explosion of granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape of Indian subcontinent. Acta Zoologica Sinica 52, Suppl. 2: 96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peh K.S.H., Sodhi N.S., De Jong J., Sekercioglu C.H., Yap C.A.M., Lim S.L.H. 2006. Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in southern Peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distributions 12, 5: 572-581.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perfecto I., Vandermeer J. 2008. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1134, 1:173-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pielou E. C.1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of theoretical biology. 13: 131-144.10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Praveen J., Jayapal R., Pittie A. 2016. A checklist of the birds of India. Indian Birds 11, 5-6: 113-170]Search in Google Scholar
[Rahamani A.R., Kasambe R. 2016. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in India: Priority Sites for conservation Revised and updated. Bombay Natural History Society, Indian Bird conservation Network, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and BirdLife International U.K, pp. 1992+xii]Search in Google Scholar
[Rahmani A.R., Soni R.G. 1997. Avifaunal changes in the Indian Thar desert. Journal of arid environments 36, 4: 687-703.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raman T.S. 2006. Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shaded plantations in the Western Ghats, India. In: Forest Diversity and Management. Dordrecht, pp. 517-547.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramankutty N., Foley J.A., Olejniczak N.J. 2002. People on the land: Changes in global population and croplands during the 20th century. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31, 3: 251-257.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasmussen P. C., Anderton J. C. 2012. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley guide. Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions. Washington, D.C. and Barcelona.]Search in Google Scholar
[Remsen Jr J.V., Parker III T.A. 1983. Contribution of river-created habitats to bird species richness in Amazonia. Biotropica, pp.223-231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sekercioglu C.H., Loarie S.R., OVIEDO BRENES F.E.D.E.R.I.C.O., Ehrlich P.R., Daily G.C. 2007. Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conservation Biology 21, 2: 482-494.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shankar Raman, T.R., 2003. Assessment of census techniques for interspecific comparisons of tropical rainforest bird densities: a field evaluation in the Western Ghats, India. Ibis 145, 1: 9-21.10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00105.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sisk, T. D., C. R. Margules. 1993. Habitat edges and restoration: methods for quantifying edge effects and predicting the results of restoration efforts. [in:] Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J., Ehrlich, P.R. (eds). Reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems. New South Wales, Australia, Nature conservation 3: 45-55]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith A.C., Fahrig L., Francis C.M. 2011. Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography 34, 1: 103-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sodhi N.S., Koh L.P., Brook B.W., Ng P.K. 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends in ecology & evolution 19, 12: 654-660.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundar K.G. and Subramanya S. 2010. Bird use of rice fields in the Indian subcontinent. Waterbirds: 44-70.10.1675/063.033.s104]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundar K.G., Chauhan A.S., Kittur S., Babu S. 2015. Wetland loss and waterbird use of wetlands in Palwal district, Haryana, India: the role of agriculture, urbanization and conversion to fish ponds. Wetlands 35, 1: 115-125.10.1007/s13157-014-0600-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundar K.G., Kittur S. 2013. Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India. Biological conservation. 168: 49-56.10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Sutcliffe L.M., Batáry P., Kormann U., Báldi A., Dicks L.V., Herzon I., Kleijn D., Tryjanowski P., Apostolova I., Arlettaz R., Aunins A. 2015. Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Diversity and Distributions 21, 6: 722-730.]Search in Google Scholar
[Findlay C.S., Bourdages J. 2000. Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology 14, 1: 86-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tilman D., Fargione J., Wolff B., D’antonio C., Dobson A., Howarth R., Schindler D., Schlesinger W.H., Simberloff D., Swackhamer D. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292, 5515: 281-28410.1126/science.105754411303102]Search in Google Scholar
[Tryjanowski P., Hartel T., Báldi A., Szymañski P., Tobolka M., Herzon I., Goławski A., Konvièka M., Hromada M., Jerzak L., Kujawa K. 2011. Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithologica 46, 1: 1-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner R.K., Van Den Bergh J.C., Söderqvist T., Barendregt A., Van Der Straaten J., Maltby E.,Van Ierland E.C. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological economics 35, 1: 7-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verma M., Bakshi N. Nair R.P. 2001. Economic valuation of Bhoj Wetland for sustainable use. Unpublished project report for World Bank assistance to Government of India, Environmental Management Capacity-Building. Bhopal: Indian Institute of Forest Management, 35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Villard M.A., Metzger J.P. 2014. Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat conFig.uration really matters. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 2: 309-318.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright H.L., Lake I.R., Dolman P.M. 2012. Agriculture – a key element for conservation in the developing world. Conservation Letters 5, 1: 11-19.]Search in Google Scholar