Application of GGE biplot graphs in multi-environment trials on selection of forest trees

Balzarini M. 2002. Applications of mixed models in plant breeding. In: Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding (ed.: M.S. Kang). CABI Publishing, UK, 353-365.Search in Google Scholar

Bradu D., Gabriel K.R. 1978. The biplot as a diagnostic tool for models of two-way tables. Technometrics, 20, 47-68. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1978.10489617.10.1080/00401706.1978.10489617Search in Google Scholar

Cooper M., DeLacy I.H. 1994. Relationships among analytic methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding Multi-environment experiments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 88, 561-572. DOI: 10.1007/BF01240919.10.1007/BF01240919Search in Google Scholar

Cornelius P.L., Crossa J. 1999. Prediction assessment of shrinkage estimators of multiplicative models for multi-environment cultivar trials. Crop Science, 39, 998-1009. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci-1999.0011183X003900040007x.Search in Google Scholar

Cornelius P.L., Seyedsadr M. 1997. Estimation of general linear-bilinear models for two-way tables. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 58, 287-322. DOI: 10.1080/00949659708811837.10.1080/00949659708811837Search in Google Scholar

Cornelius P.L., Crossa J., Seyedsadr M. 1996. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for cultivar trials. In: Genotype- by-Environment Interaction (eds.: M.S. Kang, H.G. Gauch, Jr). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 199-234.Search in Google Scholar

Correia I., Alia R., Yan W., David T., Aguiar A., Almeida M.H. 2010. Genotype × environment interactions in Pinus pinaster at age 10 in a multi-environment trial in Portugal: a maximum likelihood approach. Annals of Forest Science, 67, 612p1-612p9. DOI: 10.1051/forest/2010025.10.1051/forest/2010025Search in Google Scholar

Crossa J. 2012. From genotype × environment interaction to gene × environment interaction. Current Genomics, 13 (3), 225-244. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com.prxy4.ursus.maine.edu/direct.asp?ArticleID=473EADE10B8406E6D70F.10.2174/138920212800543066Search in Google Scholar

Ding M., Tier B., Yan W., Wu H.X., Powell M.B., McRae T.A. 2008. Application of GGE biplot analysis to evaluate Genotype (G), Environment (E), a nd G×E interaction on Pinus radiata: a case study. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 38 (1), 132-142. Available at: http://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/5596/NZJFS_38_12008_Ding_et_al_132-142.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. 1966. Stability parameter for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6, 36-40. Available at: http://www.sap.uchile.cl/descargas/fisiogenetica/Stability%20parameters%20for%20comparing%20varieties_Eberhart_Russell1966.pdf.10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011xSearch in Google Scholar

Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14, 742-754. DOI: 10.1071/AR9630742.10.1071/AR9630742Search in Google Scholar

Gabriel K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58, 453-467. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453.10.1093/biomet/58.3.453Search in Google Scholar

Gabriel K.R. 1972. Analysis of meteorological data by means of canonical decompositions and biplots. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 11, 1071-1077. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<1071:AOMDBM>2.0.CO;2.10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<1071:AOMDBM>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Gabriel K.R. 1978. Least squares approximation of matrices by additive and multiplicative models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 40, 186-196. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.prxy4.ursus.maine.edu/stable/2984752.Search in Google Scholar

Gauch H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics, 44, 705-715. DOI: 10.2307/2531585.10.2307/2531585Search in Google Scholar

Gauch H.G 1992. Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

Gauch G.H., Zobel R.W. 1997. Interpreting mega- -environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 37, 311-326. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1997 .0011183X003700020002x.Search in Google Scholar

Golub G.H., Reinsch C. 1971. The singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. In: Handbook for Automatic Computation (eds.: J.H. Wilkinson, C. Renisch). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 134-151.Search in Google Scholar

Hocking R.R., Speed F.M. 1975. A full-rank analysis of some linear model problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 706-712. DOI: 10.2307/2285959.10.2307/2285959Search in Google Scholar

Hotelling H. 1933. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417-441, 498-520. DOI: 10.1037/h0071325.10.1037/h0071325Search in Google Scholar

Hotelling H. 1936. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 27, 321-377. DOI: 10.2307/2333955.10.2307/2333955Search in Google Scholar

Jolliffe I.T. 1972. Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. I: Artifical Data. Applied Statistics, 21, 160-173. DOI: 10.2307/2346488.10.2307/2346488Search in Google Scholar

Jolliffe I.T. 1973. Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. II: Real Data. Applied Statistics, 22, 21-31. DOI: 10.2307/2346300.10.2307/2346300Search in Google Scholar

Khattree R., Naik D.N. 2000. Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Search in Google Scholar

Kempton R.A. 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 103, 123-135. DOI: 10.1017/ S0021859600043392.Search in Google Scholar

Kim I., Kwon H., Ryu K., Choi W.Y. 2008. Provenance by Site Interaction of Pinus densiflora in Korea. Silvae Genetica, 57 (3), 131-139.Search in Google Scholar

Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Search in Google Scholar

Liu G., Cornelius P.L. 2001. Simulations and derived approximations for the means and standard deviations of the characteristic roots of a Wishart matrix. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 30, 963-989. DOI: 10.1081/SAC-100107791.10.1081/SAC-100107791Search in Google Scholar

McCabe G.P. 1984. Principal Variables. Technometrics, 26 (2), 137-144. DOI: 10.2307/1268108.10.2307/1268108Search in Google Scholar

Murillo O. 2001. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic gain on unbalanced Pinus oocarpa provenances trials. Agronomia Costarricense 25 (1), 21-32.Search in Google Scholar

Patterson H.D., Thompson R. 1971. Recovery of inter- -block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58, 545-554. DOI: 10.2307/2334389.10.2307/2334389Search in Google Scholar

Patterson H.D., Thompson R. 1975. Maximum likelihood estimation of components of variance. Proceedings of 8th International Biometric Conference, 197-207.Search in Google Scholar

Pearson K. 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2 (11), 559-572. DOI: 10.1080/14786440109462720.10.1080/14786440109462720Search in Google Scholar

Piepho H.P. 1998. Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor analytic variance- covariance structures. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97, 195-201.Search in Google Scholar

Piepho H.P., Möhring J. 2006. Selection in cultivar trials - is it ignorable? Crop Sciences, 46, 192-201.Search in Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2013. SAS/STAT® 13.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC:SAS Institute Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Saxton A.M. 2004. Genetic analysis of complex traits using SAS. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, N.C.Search in Google Scholar

Sixto H., Gil P.M., Ciria P., Camps F., Cañellas I., Voltas J. 2015, Interpreting genotype-by-environment interaction for biomass production in hybrid poplars under short-rotation coppice in Mediterranean environments. GCB Bioenergy. DOI: 10.1111/ gcbb.12313.Search in Google Scholar

Taibi K. 2014. Title of dissertation “Integrated approach for addressing assisted population migration programs in forest management to climate change: Out- -planting performance, genotype by environment interactions, physiological and molecular response”. The Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain.Search in Google Scholar

Ukalska J., Kociuba W. 2013. Phenotypical diversity of winter triticale genotypes collected in the Polish Gene Bank between 1982 and 2008 with regard to major quantitative traits. Field Crops Research, 149, 203-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.010.10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.010Search in Google Scholar

Ukalski K., Śmiałowski T., Ukalska J. 2010a. Analysis of oat yield environments using graphical GGE method. Colloquium Biometricum, 40, 81-93.Search in Google Scholar

Ukalski K., Śmiałowski T., Ukalska J. 2010b. Analiza plonowania i stabilności genotypów owsa za pomocą metody graficznej typu GGE. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, 3 (70), 127-140.Search in Google Scholar

Yan W. 1999. A study on the methodology of cultivar evaluation based on yield trial data with special reference to winter wheat in Ontario. Ph.D. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Search in Google Scholar

Yan W. 2001. GGE biplot: a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1111-1118. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x.10.2134/agronj2001.9351111xSearch in Google Scholar

Yan W. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data. Agronomy Journal, 94, 990-996. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2002.0990.10.2134/agronj2002.0990Search in Google Scholar

Yan W., Cornelius P.L., Crossa J., Hunt L.A. 2001. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multienvironment trial data. Crop Science, 41, 656-663. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.413656x.10.2135/cropsci2001.413656xSearch in Google Scholar

Yan W., Hunt L.A. 2001. Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41, 19-25. DOI: 10.2135/ cropsci2001.41119x.10.2135/cropsci2001.41119xSearch in Google Scholar

Yan W., Hunt L.A., Sheng Q., Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40, 597-605. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x.10.2135/cropsci2000.403597xSearch in Google Scholar

Yan W., Kang M.S. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, genetics and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.10.1201/9781420040371Search in Google Scholar

Yan W., Rajcan I.R. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 42, 11-20. DOI: 10.2135/ cropsci2002.0011.Search in Google Scholar

Yan W., Tinker N.A. 2005. An integrated biplot analysis system for displaying, interpreting, and exploring genotype-×environment interactions. Crop Science, 45, 1004-1016. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0076.10.2135/cropsci2004.0076Search in Google Scholar

Yan W., Tinker N.A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86, 623-645.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao X., Xia H., Wang X., Wang C., Liang D., Li K., et al. 2016. Variance and stability analyses of growth characters in half-sib Betula platyphylla families at three different sites in China. Euphytica, 208, 173-186. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1617-7.10.1007/s10681-015-1617-7Search in Google Scholar

Zobel R.W., Wright M.J., Gauch H.G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80, 388-393. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1988.000219620080 00030002x.Search in Google Scholar