Otwarty dostęp

Exploration of Teaching Preferences of Instructors’use of Social Media


Zacytuj

1. Ainin, S., Naqshbandi, M. M., Moghavvemi, S., & Jaafar, N. I. (2015). Facebook usage, socialization and academic performance. Computers & Education, 83, 64-73.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.018Search in Google Scholar

2. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher education, 11(2), 71-80.Search in Google Scholar

3. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

4. Arends, R. (2011). Learning to Teach (9th revised ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

5. Baran, B. (2010). Facebook as a formal instructional environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), E146-E149.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01115.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Borich, G. D. (2013). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177-198.Search in Google Scholar

8. Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (2013). Methods for Effective Teaching: Meeting the Needs of All Students (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

9. Çoklar, A. N. (2012). Evaluations of Students on Facebook as an Educational Environment. Online Submission, 3(2), 42-53.Search in Google Scholar

10. Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441-451.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005Search in Google Scholar

11. Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in Higher Education - A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55(1), 92-100.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006Search in Google Scholar

12. Ferdig, R. E., & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘Blogosphere’. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 31(7), 12-16.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Routledge.10.4324/9781410607201Search in Google Scholar

14. Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2011). Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom. Paper presented at the NMSA Annual Conference and Exhibit. Retrieved from http://ccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/formative_and_summative_assessment_in_the_classroom.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

15. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kilis, S., Rapp, C., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). Validation of Social Media Toolkit. Proceedings of the Ireland International Conference on Education, Dublin, October 27-30, 2014, 27-29. Retrieved from http://www.somecat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Kilis-Rapp-G%C3%BClbahar-Reliability-and-Validity-of-Social-Media-Toolkit.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

17. Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and higher education, 13(4), 206-213.10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

18. Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 15(6), 703-714.10.1080/13562517.2010.507307Search in Google Scholar

19. Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79-95.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41-58.10.1080/09588220903467335Search in Google Scholar

21. Lundin, R. W. (2008). Teaching with wikis: Toward a networked pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 432-448.10.1016/j.compcom.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

22. Macdonald, J., & Poniatowska, B. (2011). Designing the professional development of staff for teaching online: an OU (UK) case study. Distance Education, 32(1), 119-134.10.1080/01587919.2011.565481Search in Google Scholar

23. Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155.10.1080/17439880902923606Search in Google Scholar

24. Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36(3), 437-455. 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.004Search in Google Scholar

25. McLean, R., Richards, B. H., & Wardman, J. (2007). The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? Medical Journal of Australia, 187(3), 174.Search in Google Scholar

26. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Annual Conference, 664-675.Search in Google Scholar

27. Nystrand, M., & Brandt, D. (1989). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 209-230). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Search in Google Scholar

28. OECD (2007). Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/participativewebandusercreatedcontentweb20wikisandsocialnetworking.htmSearch in Google Scholar

29. Panitz, T. (2011). A definition of collaborative vs cooperative learning, 1996. Retrieved from http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/a_definition_of_collaborative_vs_cooperative_learning.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

30. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010Search in Google Scholar

31. Pineda, M. V. G. (2007). Videos, Blogs and Podcasts: Leverage Instruments of Teaching and Learning Assets. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 15(3), 32.1-32.5.Search in Google Scholar

32. Presley, M., & McCormick, C. (2007). Cognition, Teaching, and Assessment. Harper Collins College Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

33. Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2008). Functions of social networking services. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 87-98.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rinaldo, S. B., Tapp, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2011). Learning by tweeting: Using Twitter as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 193-203. doi: 10.1177/0273475311410852.10.1177/0273475311410852Search in Google Scholar

35. Rowe, M., Bozalek, V., & Frantz, J. (2013). Using Google Drive to facilitate a blended approach to authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 594-606.10.1111/bjet.12063Search in Google Scholar

36. Safko, L. (2010). The Social Media Bible Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

37. Stiler, G. M., & Philleo, T. (2003). Blogging and blogspots: An alternative format for encouraging reflective practice among preservice teachers. Academic Research Library, 123(4), 789-798.Search in Google Scholar

38. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002Search in Google Scholar

39. Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2013). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. Calico Journal, 25(3), 528-546.Search in Google Scholar

40. Tekinarslan, E. (2008). Blogs: A qualitative investigation into an instructor and undergraduate students’ experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 402-412.10.14742/ajet.1200Search in Google Scholar

41. University of Cincinnati (2013). University of Cincinnati Social Media Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ucomm/docs/UC-Social-Media-Strategy.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

42. Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11-21.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1027-5207
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
2 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Social Sciences, Education, Curriculum and Pedagogy, other