Intracluster Homogeneity Selection Problem in a Business Survey

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (2015), “Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys”, available at http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions2015_8theditionwithchanges_April2015_logo.pdf (27 January 2016)Search in Google Scholar

2. Bethlehem, J. (2009). Applied Survey Methods: A Statistical Perspective, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470494998Search in Google Scholar

3. Bricker, J. (2014). Survey Incentives, Survey Effort, and Survey Costs. FEDS Working Paper No. 2014-74, Washington, pp. 1-36.Search in Google Scholar

4. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques, New York, John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

5. Daniel, J. (2012). Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for Making Sampling Choices, Thousand Oaks, California, SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781452272047Search in Google Scholar

6. de Leeuw, E. D. (2005), “To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys”, The Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 233-255.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dillman, D. A. (1991), “The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 17, pp. 225-249.10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001301Search in Google Scholar

8. Gonzalez, J. M., Eltinge, J. L. (2010), “Optimal Survey Design: A Review”, available at http://www.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st100270.pdf (27 January 2016)Search in Google Scholar

9. Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471725277Search in Google Scholar

10. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Methodology. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

11. Groves, R. M., Heeringa, S. G. (2006), “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 169, No. 3, pp. 439-457.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xSearch in Google Scholar

12. Humphreys, C. P. (1979), “The cost of sample survey designs”, Proceedings Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 395-400.Search in Google Scholar

13. Karr, A. F., Last, M. (2006), “Survey Costs: Workshop Report and White Paper”, Technical Report Number 161, September 2006, National Institute of Statistical Sciences, pp. 1-22.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kish, L. (1995). Survey Sampling, New York, John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

15. Krosnick, J. A., Presser, S., Fealing, K. H., Ruggles, S. (2015), “The Future of Survey Research: Challenges and Opportunities”, available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/The_Future_of_Survey_Research.pdf (27 January 2016)Search in Google Scholar

16. Leon, E. A., Perez, A.M., Stevenson, M.A., Robiolo, B., Mattion, N., Seki, C., La Torre, J., Torres, A., Cosentino, B., Duffy, S. J. (2014), “Effectiveness of systematic foot and mouth disease mass vaccination campaigns in Argentina”, Scientific and Technical Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 917-926.10.20506/rst.33.3.2329Search in Google Scholar

17. Levy, P. S., Lemeshow, S. (2008). Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470374597Search in Google Scholar

18. Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D., Elliott, M. N. (2002). Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web, Santa Monica, RAND Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

19. van Breukelen, G. J., Candel, M. J. (2012), “Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!”, Journal of clinical epidomology, Vol. 65, No. 11, pp. 1212-1218.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.002Search in Google Scholar

20. Varberg, D., Purcell, E. J. (1997). Calculus, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

21. Žmuk, B. (2013), “The Relevance of Statistical Methods Application to Business Performance of Enterprises”, doctoral thesis, Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business.Search in Google Scholar

22. Žmuk, B. (2015a), “Business Sample Survey Measurement on Statistical Thinking and Methods Adoption: the Case of Croatian Small Enterprises”, Interdisciplinary description of complex systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 154-166.10.7906/indecs.13.1.14Search in Google Scholar

23. Žmuk, B., (2015b), “The impact of intracluster homogeneity on the survey costs: A Croatian business survey”, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Operational Research SOR’15 (Editors: Zadnik Stirn, L., Žerovnik, J., Kljajić Borštnar, M., Drobne, S.), Bled, Slovenia, September 23-25, 2015, Ljubljana: Slovenian Society Informatika, Section for Operational Research, pp. 329-334.Search in Google Scholar