<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

In the second half of the 13th century, the process of incorporation or institution of cities (a.k.a. the process of granting municipal rights) under German law began in Greater Poland. By 1314, i.e. until the end of the existence of a separate district duchy of Greater Poland, 51 successful city incorporations were carried out in its area, by princes and clerical as well as secular feudal lords At the same time, there were also 8 unsuccessful incorporation initiatives (14%). An unsuccessful settlement is a settlement that did not lead to the creation of a town or a settlement that had to be repeated after some time, especially with the consent of another ruler or another settlement owner. The article discusses these failed ventures while attempting to analyse the specific reasons for the failures. The following factors or their combinations can be pointed out: periodic unrest and political instability in the region, limiting the circle of potential settlers only to newcomers from abroad (with the exclusion of the locals), unclear legal and ownership status of the settlement being incorporated, competition from a nearby, stronger center, lack of sufficient support from the feudal owner (especially in the case of clerical and private feudals). At this early stage in the development of urban life, it is also possible to see a clear advantage of monarchical incorporations, which usually had a greater chance of success and further successful development. A similar distribution of unsuccessful and successful granting of municipal rights to towns (15%) has been noted by the literature in medieval Silesia.
</abstract>

Unsuccessful Attempts at the Incorporation of Cities in the District Duchy of Greater Poland in the 13th Century

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The article attempts to determine the usefulness of the concept of resourcefulness for research in the field of social history of the People’s Republic of Poland. On the basis of examples concerning problems with provisions, housing, professional work and retirement benefits, an analysis of specific issues was made, where this resourcefulness manifested itself particularly intensively. The research shows that in many cases it was pathological. It meant a strategy of behavior consisting in achieving the assumed goals by individuals or various groups of people using means that are in conflict with the norms, rules, procedures accepted as appropriate in a given political and socio-economic order.
</abstract>

Food, Housing, Work, Retirement: Resourcefulness in Everyday Life as an Element of the Functioning of Society and the Economy in the People’s Republic of Poland (Selected Aspects)

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

State entrepreneurship, or rather statism, was a strongly developed phenomenon in the economy of interwar Poland. Initially, its source was the legacy of the partition period in the form of the considerable assets of the partitioned states, numerous industrial plants, banks, transport infrastructure, forests and land. In a reborn Poland, in order to strengthen the economy and military potential, the authorities undertook, among other things, a number of industrial investments, developed state-owned banking and transport enterprises and organised profitable treasury monopolies. The share of the state sector in the economy reached 20%, and in some areas even 100%. Researchers of state entrepreneurship, usually, have emphasised its considerable economic efficiency and important social role.
</abstract>

State Entrepreneurship in Interwar Poland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Numerous studies on the economies of socialist countries indicate that one of the main sources of their weakness was the attitudes and behavior of “socialist managers”. Contrary to the predictions (e.g. by Joseph Schumpeter), they were not characterized by entrepreneurship, innovation, the ability to lead changes or the ability to formulate strategies. This was due to the nomenclature system existing in all countries of the Soviet bloc. Nominations, promotions, but also dismissals were at the discretion of party bodies. It was the main source of the communist party’s dominance in the country and the fundamental factor guaranteeing control over all spheres of social and economic life. Determining why the nomenclature system turned out to be dysfunctional requires considering three issues: what were the goals of the communist personnel policy, what methods were used to implement it, and finally who were the people appointed to perform managerial functions in the economy. We will focus our analysis on the management of Polish industry in the years 1945–1956. This is because it was the most important sector of the economy of the People’s Republic of Poland, and the personnel policy mechanisms developed at that time remained valid until the end of the “real socialism” system.
</abstract>

Principles of Shaping and Composition of the Management Staff of Polish Industry (1945–1956)

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The aim of this article is to present a tourist mining path located in southern Poland. This involves coal, silver, gold, salt, flint, chalk, uranium mines and oil wells. It includes some buildings connected with workers and mine-owners as well. These buildings were previously tied to mining. Currently, they function as museums or service-buildings.
</abstract>

Second Life of Post-Mining Facilities: Mines as a Tourist Attraction of Southern Poland

Book Review: Polish Minority in the Russian Federation: Conditions, Current Status and Prospects [Mniejszość Polska W Federacji Rosyjskiej: Uwarunkowania, Stan Aktualny I Perspektywy]

Book Review: With a Zest and in a Refined Form…The 7th International Congress of Historical Sciences in Warsaw, 1933

Reports: Report from the 23rd International Congress of Historical Sciences Poznań 2020/2022 on 21–27 August 2022

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 42 (2024): Issue 1 (May 2024) HUMAN AND NATURE

Volume 41 (2023): Issue 2 (December 2023) CHILD LABOUR

Volume 41 (2023): Issue 1 (July 2023) ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ENTREPRENEURS AND ENTERPRISES

Volume 40 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022) ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ENTREPRENEURS AND ENTERPRISES

Volume 40 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022) CENSUSES, STATISTICS AND DATABASES

Volume 39 (2021): Issue 1 (December 2021) SUCCESSES AND FAILURES IN ECONOMIC LIFE

Volume 38 (2020): Issue 1 (December 2020) ECONOMIC POLICY

Volume 37 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019) WOMEN AND ECONOMY

Volume 36 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018) ECONOMIC TRANSFERS

Volume 35 (2017): Issue 1 (December 2017) STATE AND ECONOMY

Volume 34 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016) ECONOMIC CRIME

Volume 33 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015) PRIVILEGES

Volume 32 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014) POVERTY AND WEALTH

Volume 31 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013) CITY

Studia Historiae Oeconomicae

 Print ISSN: 0081-6485Electronic ISSN: 2353-7515  Studia Historiae Oeconomicae (SHO) is a refereed journal published two times a year. The journal is addressed to historians (particularly economic historians), economists, sociologists and social scientists who are interested in economic life in social and cultural contexts, both from theoretical and empirical points of view.  The general objective of the journal is to be open to the results of research on both past and contemporary social and economic phenomena, mainly from a historical, economic and sociological point of view.  In the era of progressive specialization of scientific research, the SHO has consistently been promoting the idea of the interdisciplinary character of research on economic history since its funding. For this reason, the SHO provides a platform that brings together socio-economic historians from various faculties, including economics, social sciences, humanities and history. The SHO sites serve as a forum for scholars from around the world, particularly those with an interest in the history of Central and Eastern Europe, to present their research and exchange ideas and engage in discussions on socio-economic history. The first issue appeared in 1967 and the founder were Prof. Czesław Łuczak and Prof. Jerzy Topolski. In the beginning, the journal was to share research results of Polish scholars in the field of economic and social history with international readers. SHO is published in English. The journal is published both in print and online.  No publication fee. Copyright Copyright is regulated by the author's statement made during the submission process and also by the license agreement for online publication concluded between the Author and the University of Adam Mickiewicz. The authors are responsible for the originality of the textual material and the regulation of copyrights regarding illustrative materials. In the event that the materials come from the editorial office - the editorial office of the journal is responsible.  The author retains unlimited copyright. Rejection Rate   30%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Volume 41 (2023): Issue 1 (July 2023) - ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ENTREPRENEURS AND ENTERPRISES

Studia Historiae Oeconomicae

Volume 41 (2023): Issue 1 (July 2023)

ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ENTREPRENEURS AND ENTERPRISES