Editorial

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The research measures the driving force of innovation in economic structure transition. In order to change the pattern of economic development, China is implementing a strategy of innovation-driven development. China’s capacity of innovation has been increasing, especially since 2012, and China’s innovations have taken a leap-forward development. Nowadays, innovation has become a main driving force in China’s economic development and hi-tech industries particularly make a great contribution. Although China’s tertiary industry has been dominant and its share in three industrial sectors has been exceeding 50% since 2015, a problem still exists in China’s economy that the proportions of primary and secondary industries are relatively higher compared with developed countries. In this paper we use PLSR model to measure the impact of innovation on China’s economic structure transition. It is found that innovation can expand the tertiary industry through shrinking the proportions of primary and secondary industries, transforming China’s economic structure into a more advanced pattern. Additionally, China is also devoting itself to the “Belt and Road Initiative”, which should be combined with China’s domestic innovation-driven development and realize sustainable development of economy worldwide.</abstract>

The Innovation-Driven Impact on Economic Structure Transition. The Case of China

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> On 1st January 2015 the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) - a new integration block comprising initially Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, and later that year also Armenia and Kyrgyzstan - appeared on the world map. This paper endeavors to identify the EAEU countries’ long-term international comparative advantages within four basic groups of goods according to the OECD classification of manufacturing industries based on technology intensity. The analysis, using B. Balassa’s RCA methodology and covering the years 2000-2014, indicates that these countries lack competitiveness, with none of them possessing any RCAs in the high-technology category whereas in the medium-hightechnology category - only Belarus. In contrast, all the EAEU countries fared the best in the medium-low-technology category, which is mostly attributable to the resources-based character of their economies. Surprisingly, dramatically low international competitiveness was recorded by Kazakhstan and Russia.</abstract>

Long-Term Comparative Advantages of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States in International Trade

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The first objective of this paper is to present theoretical approaches to the impact of trade growth (induced by monetary integration) on business cycle synchronization which is an important factor of a country’s readiness for a currency union accession. The main conclusion from the first part of the analysis is that business cycle convergence and the cost of the lack of an autonomous monetary policy depend on intra-industry trade (IIT) intensity rather than on general trade growth. The second objective is to assess - using the IIT index as a measure of business cycle synchronization (and of susceptibility to asymmetric shocks transmitted mostly through trade channels) - preparedness of the Polish economy to the euro adoption. Calculations reveal that the IIT intensity in Poland is already relatively high (in particular in relations with the euro area members) and continues to rise. This confirms the increasing complementarity of Poland’s economy with the economic structures of the euro area partners which reduces the probability of asymmetric shocks.</abstract>

Is Intra-Industry Trade Specialization a Precondition to Business Cycle Synchronization When Joining the Euro Area? The Case of Poland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The demand for sovereign ratings has increased throughout last decades. Until the1990’s, credit rating agencies (CRAs) did not rate most of the emerging markets and the focus was almost only on developed countries, however, during this decade the number of sovereigns rated increased dramatically due to addition of emerging markets to the portfolio. The global financial crisis in 2008 led to the loss of credibility of these major credit rating companies. None of these three agencies showed any signal of macroeconomic problems in countries where the financial crisis created devastating macroeconomic results. It is believed that this failure has led credit rating agencies to behave more conservatively. This paper aims to determine whether CRAs tend to behave conservatively after the 2008 global financial crisis. If the downgrading is greater than the worsening of the economic situation in the given economies, then we can infer that CRAs tend to behave more conservatively. The good working model in estimating ratings assigned by CRAs before the crisis failed to estimate the ratings after 2008 crisis. This may have happened due to two reasons. First, as experienced in the aftermath of the former crisis, credit rating agencies may have added new macroeconomic variables in the process of assigning ratings or change the weight assigned to the already existing macroeconomic variables. Second, it is a known fact that ratings emerge from the combination of two distinct information; the quantitative part reflected by macroeconomic indicators and the qualitative judgements of the agency about the sovereign.</abstract>

Examining the Behavior of Credit Rating Agencies Post 2008 Economic Turmoil

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This paper discusses the firm-level determinants of international hotels’ foreign markets entry choices, contrasting acquisition with management and franchise contracts, based on a resource-dependency perspective and appropriability theory. It points out that brand equity, relatedness of products and market segmentation, partner-specific knowledge of hotels, international experience, and the duration of proprietary knowledge impact hotels’ decisions on how to enter a foreign market. In addition, the paper suggests the existence of entry choices sequence favorable to acquisition probability after the end of management contract when the franchisors’ or management companies’ proprietary knowledge attenuates. Contract activity is likely to be renewed after the acquisition, once the management company has established a new form or a higher level of proprietary knowledge.</abstract>

A Dyadic Perspective on Determinants of Entry Choices in the Global Hospitality Industry

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The core objective of this paper is to determine the level of online dialogue in social media between the tourist industry leaders and their customers. This study applies sequential explanatory industry-representative comparison with statistical and qualitative analysis of online word-of-mouth communication. Its main finding is that even if online marketing is a hot topic, online channels seem to be neglected by the companies failing to provide real-time dialogue services. This results in the loss of customer attention and engagement and can be linked with overall corporate relationship management immaturity. In addition, the article offers vital insight into customer value creation chain of hotel and tour operators.</abstract>

Word-Of-Mouth in Social Media. The Case of Polish Tourist Industry

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 60 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 52 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 1 (September 2016)

Volume 50 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 49 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 48 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (September 2015)

Volume 46 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)

Volume 45 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 44 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)

Volume 43 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)

Volume 42 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)

Volume 41 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 40 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)

Volume 39 (2013): Issue 1 (September 2013)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 37 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

International Journal of Management and Economics

 IJME is a platform for scientific discussion and knowledge sharing open for all researchers worldwide.  IJME aims to enhance the body of knowledge in a variety of economic disciplines, such as economy, management, business administration, finance, marketing, logistics, entrepreneurship, etc. IJME is focused on international economic problems and research, however the single country perspective enabling the international comparisons is also welcome.  IJME accepts original works, substantively different from papers previously published or being under review elsewhere.  Rejection Rate   50%   The journal of the SGH WARSAW SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 