Active Ageing Index, New Emphasis Within the Same Methodology. The Role of the Internet

1. Ahmed, M., (2011), Defining and Measuring Literacy: Facing the Reality, International Review of Education, 57(1-2), 179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9188-x10.1007/s11159-011-9188-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Bandura, R., (2008), A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2008 update. New York: United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies (UNDP/ODS Working Paper)Search in Google Scholar

3. Berde, É., Kuncz, I., (2019), What is the Best Way to Take Internet Usage into Consideration in the Different Variants of the Active Ageing Index?. Society and Economy, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2019.00310.1556/204.2019.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Carstensen, L.L., (1995), Evidence for a Life-Span Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep1151226110.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Djurovic, I., Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Dobrota, M., (2017), A Two-Step Multivariate Composite I-Distance Indicator Approach for the Evaluation of Active Ageing Index. Journal of Population Ageing, 10(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9169-810.1007/s12062-016-9169-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Dobrota, M., Bulajic, M., Bornmann, L., Jeremic, V., (2016), A New Approach to the QS University Ranking Using the Composite I-distance Indicator: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2335510.1002/asi.23355Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. EU, (2007), Ageing Well in the Information Society: Action Plan on Information and Communication Technologies and Ageing. Retrieved from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Al24292, Accessed on March 8, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

8. Eurostat, (2018), Eurostat Database, Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed on March 5, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

9. Hargittai, E., (2002), Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.94210.5210/fm.v7i4.942Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Hazelkorn, E., (2009), Rankings and the Battle for World-Class Excellence, Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.21427/D76P7M10.1787/hemp-v21-art4-enSearch in Google Scholar

11. Hawton, A., Green, C., Dickens, A.P., Richards, S.H., Taylor, R.S., Edwards, R., Campbell, J.L., (2011), The Impact of Social Isolation on the Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life of Older People. Quality of Life Research, 20(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9717-210.1007/s11136-010-9717-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Hellström, Y., Persson, G., Hallberg, I.R., (2004), Quality of Life and Symptoms Among Older People Living at Home. Journal of advanced nursing, 48(6), 584-593. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03247.x10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03247.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Ivanovic, B., (1973), A Method of Establishing a List of Development Indicators. Paris: United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., Radojicic, Z., (2011), A Fresh Approach to Evaluating the Academic Ranking of World Universities. Scientometrics, 87(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0361-610.1007/s11192-011-0361-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Krueger, D.C., Stone, D.L., Lukaszewski, K.M., (2018), Age and the Digital Divide, Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 13(3), 75-84.10.33423/jsis.v13i3.620Search in Google Scholar

16. Lazăr, C., Epure, D.T., Spătariu, E.C., (2011), Digital Economy Impact on Society, Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, 11(1), 1131-1133.Search in Google Scholar

17. Loucanova, E., Kalamarova, M., Parobek, J., (2017), The Innovative Approaches to Packaging – Comparison Analysis of Intelligent and Active Packaging Perceptions in Slovakia, Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad, Economics Series, 27(2), 33-44. http://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2017-000710.1515/sues-2017-0007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Neagu, O., Dima S., (2017), Impact of Globalisation On Economic Growth in Romania: An Empirical Analysis of Its Economic, Social and Political Dimensions, Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad, Economics Series, 27(1), 29-40. http://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2017-000310.1515/sues-2017-0003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M., (1999), Issue Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion, The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040-1067. http://doi.org/10.2307/264755310.2307/2647553Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. OECD, (2008), Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publications. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en10.1787/9789264043466-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P.M., (2006), Adolescents’ Internet Use: Testing the “Disappearing Digital Divide” versus the “Emerging Digital Differentiation” Approach. Poetics, 34(4-5), 293-305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.00510.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. São José, J.M., Timonen, V., Amado, C.A.F., Santos, S.P., (2017), A Critique of the Active Ageing Index, Journal of Aging Studies, 40, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2017.01.00110.1016/j.jaging.2017.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Searing, D.D., (1978), Measuring Politicians’ Values: Administration and Assessment of a Ranking Technique in the British House of Commons. American Political Science Review, 72(1), 65-79, https://doi.org/10.2307/195359910.2307/1953599Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Srinuan, C., Bohlin, E., (2011), Understanding the Digital Divide: A Literature Survey and Ways Forward, 22^nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications – Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).Search in Google Scholar

25. Tirado-Morueta, R., Aguaded-Gómez, J.I., Hernando-Gómez, Á., (2018), The Socio-Demographic Divide in Internet Usage Moderated by Digital Literacy Support. Technology in Society, 55, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.00110.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Van Deursen, A.J., Van Dijk, J., (2011), Internet Skills and the Digital Divide, New Media & Society, 13(6): 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481038677410.1177/1461444810386774Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. WHO, (2002), Active Ageing – A Policy Framework, The Contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing, Madrid, Spain, April 2002.Search in Google Scholar

28. Yang, L., (2014), An Inventory of Composite Measures of Human Progress, Occasional Paper on Methodology, UNDP Human Development Report OfficeSearch in Google Scholar

29. Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M.H., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P., Zolyomi, E., (2013), Active Ageing Index 2012: Concept, Methodology and Final Results. Report Produced in Collaboration with UNECE (Geneva) and European Commission’s DG for Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion, (Brussels).Search in Google Scholar