The Morphosemantic Transparency/Opacity of Novel English Analogical Compounds and Compound Families

Anttila, Raimo. 2003. Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425-440. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2015. Word-formation and analogy. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-Formation - An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe: Volume 2, 822-841. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110246278-002Search in Google Scholar

Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Melanie J. Bell. Under revision. Analogy and the nature of linguistic generalisation: Locality, generality, and variability in English compound stress. Manuscript, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf & Anglia Ruskin University.Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165846Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486210Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie & Paul Nation. 1993. Word families. International Journal of Lexicography 6(4). 253-279.10.1093/ijl/6.4.253Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Melanie J. 2012. The English noun-noun construct: A morphological and syntactic object. In Angela Ralli, Geert Booij, Sergio Scalise & Athanasios Karasimos (eds.), Morphology and the architecture of grammar. Proceedings of the 8th International Morphology Meeting, 59-91. Patras: University of Patras; http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Melanie J. & Ingo Plag. 2013. Informativity and analogy in English compound stress. Word Structure 6(2). 129-155.10.3366/word.2013.0042Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Melanie J. & Martin Schäfer. 2016. Modelling semantic transparency. Morphology 26(2). 157-199.10.1007/s11525-016-9286-3Search in Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2006. Creative compounding in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.19Search in Google Scholar

Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150-177.10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661Search in Google Scholar

Bertram, Raymond, R. Harold Baayen & Robert Schreuder. 2000. Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language 42. 390-405.10.1006/jmla.1999.2681Search in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. E. 2010. Compound constructions: Schemas or analogy? A construction morphology perspective. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 93-108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.09booSearch in Google Scholar

Bourque, Stephen Yves. 2014. Toward a typology of semantic transparency: The case of French compounds. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of French Studies, University of Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, Charlotte. 2014. Treasure-house of the Language: The Living OED. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology. Approaches in modern linguistics, 119-141. San Diego: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structure. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, Nivja H., Laurie B. Feldman, Robert Schreuder, Matthew Pastizzo & Baayen R. Harald. 2002. The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language 81(1). 555-567.10.1006/brln.2001.2547Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2000. Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds.), Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, 1-10. München: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang U. Wurzel. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.10Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Barbara Tumfart. 2017. New corpus-linguistic approaches to the investigation of poetic occasionalisms: The case of Johann Nepomuk Nestroy. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic meeting 3. 155-166.10.1515/yplm-2017-0008Search in Google Scholar

Fabb, Nigel. 1998. Compounding. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 66-83. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781405166348.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Fertig, David L. 2013. Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748646234Search in Google Scholar

Gagné, Christina L. 2009. Psycholinguistic perspectives. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 255-271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding. 2014. Typing time as an index of morphological and semantic effects during English compound processing. Lingue e Linguaggio 13(2). 241-262.Search in Google Scholar

Gardani, Francesco. 2013. Dynamics of morphological creativity. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004244658Search in Google Scholar

Goswami, Usha. 1991. Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory. Child Development 62(1). 1-22.10.2307/1130701Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Harald Baayen. 2002. Parsing and productivity. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001, 203-235. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_8Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1968. The state of the art. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783112312926Search in Google Scholar

Jarema, Gonia, Céline Busson, Rossitza Nikolova, Kyrana Tsapkini & Gary Libben. 1999. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language 68. 362-369.10.1006/brln.1999.2088Search in Google Scholar

Klégr, Aleš & Jan Čermák. 2010. Neologisms of the ‘on-the-pattern-of’ type: Analogy as a word-formation process?. In Martin Procházka, Markéta Malá & Pavlína Šaldová (eds.), The Prague School and theories of structure, 229-241. Göttingen: V&R unipress.10.14220/9783862347049.229Search in Google Scholar

Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1993. Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen: Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Krott, Andrea. 2009. The role of analogy for compound words. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 118-136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1996. Identifying and interpreting blends: An experimental approach. Cognitive Linguistics 7(4). 359-390.10.1515/cogl.1996.7.4.359Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2003. Understanding trendy neologisms. Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica 15(2). 369-382.Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Judith N. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Libben, Gary. 1998. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language 61. 30-44.10.1006/brln.1997.1876Search in Google Scholar

Libben, Gary. 2008. Compounding and cognition. ICCS Proceedings, 27-29 July 2008. Seoul, Korea.Search in Google Scholar

Libben, Gary. 2010. Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In Susan Olsen (ed.), New impulses in word-formation, 317-330. Hamburg: Buske.Search in Google Scholar

Libben, Gary & Silke Weber. 2014. Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning, 205-221. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.327.14libSearch in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2005. English word-formation processes. Observations, issues, and thoughts on future research. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of English word-formation, 375-427. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_16Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Dilin & Hongwei Zhan. 2015. The use of the -free compound and free of and free from phrasal constructions: A diachronic and synchronic study. Journal of English Linguistics 43(3): 201-226.10.1177/0075424215591851Search in Google Scholar

Marle, Jaap van. 1985. On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111558387Search in Google Scholar

Mattiello, Elisa. 2008. An introduction to English slang: A description of its morphology, semantics and sociology. Monza: Polimetrica.Search in Google Scholar

Mattiello, Elisa. 2013. Extra-grammatical morphology in English. Abbreviations, blends, reduplicatives, and related phenomena. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110295399Search in Google Scholar

Mattiello, Elisa. 2016. Analogical neologisms in English. Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica 28(2). 103-142.Search in Google Scholar

Mattiello, Elisa. 2017a. Analogy in word-formation. A study of English neologisms and occasionalisms. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110551419Search in Google Scholar

Mattiello, Elisa. 2017b. The impact of figuration on word-formation: The role of figurative language in the production and interpretation of novel analogical compounds. Textus XXX(1). 17-32.Search in Google Scholar

Motsch, Wolfgang. 1981. Der kreative Aspekt in der Wortbildung. In Leonhard Lipka (ed.), Wortbildung, 94-118. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Mugglestone, Lynda, 2005. Lost for words: The hidden history of the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mulder, Kimberley, Ton Dijkstra, Robert Schreuder & R. Harald Baayen. 2014. Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language 72. 59-84.10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara Hall, Alice G. B. ter Meulen & Robert Eugene Wall. 1990. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841323Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2010. Compound stress assignment by analogy: The constituent family bias. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29(2). 243-282.10.1515/zfsw.2010.009Search in Google Scholar

Pollatsek, Alexander & Jukka Hyönä. 2005. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 20(1/2). 261-290.10.1080/01690960444000098Search in Google Scholar

Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky. 2014. Morphology and meaning: An overview. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning, 3-46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.327.02raiSearch in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Olga Isabel Díez Velasco. 2002. Patterns of conceptual interaction. In René Dirven & Ralph Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 489-532. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio. 1992. Compounding in Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica 4(1). 175-199.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Martin. 2018. The semantic transparency of English compound nouns. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidtke, Daniel, Victor Kuperman, Christina C. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding. 2016. Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: The role of entropy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23(2). 556-570.10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0Search in Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Sonja, Jutta Ransmayr, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Sabine Sommer-Lolei & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2017. Scaling morphosemantic transparency/opacity: A corpus-linguistic and acquisitionist study of German diminutives. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 3(1). 141-153.10.1515/yplm-2017-0007Search in Google Scholar

Skousen, Royal & Thereon Stanford. 2007. AM: Parallel. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Viktor, Daniel Barratt & Jordan Zlatev. 2014. Unpacking noun-noun compounds: Interpreting novel and conventional food names in isolation and on food labels. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1). 99-147.10.1515/cog-2013-0032Search in Google Scholar

Talamo, Luigi, Chiara Celata & Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2016. DerIvaTario: An annotated lexicon of Italian derivatives. Word Structure 9(1). 72-102.10.3366/word.2016.0087Search in Google Scholar

Tardif, Twila, Susan A. Gelman & Fan Xu. 1999. Putting the ‘noun bias’ in context: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development 70(3). 620-635.10.1111/1467-8624.00045Search in Google Scholar

Algeo, John (ed.). 1991. Fifty years among the new words: A dictionary of neologisms, 1941-1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Corpus of contemporary American English. 1990-2017. COCA. Brigham Young University. Available at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (27 January, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Neologisms – new words in journalistic text. 1997-2012. Birmingham City University. Available at http://rdues.bcu.ac.uk/neologisms.shtml (11 December, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Oxford English dictionary online. 1989-2018. 2nd edn./3rd edn. (OED2/OED3). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at http://www.oed.com/ (11 December, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

The Rice University neologisms database. 2004-2014. Rice University. Available at http://neologisms.rice.edu/ (11 December, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Urban dictionary. 1999-2017. Available at http://www.urbandictionary.com/ (11 December, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Wordspy – The word lover’s guide to new words. 1995-2017. Available at http://www.wordspy.com/ (11 December, 2016).Search in Google Scholar