[Aldridge, Edith. 2012. PPs and applicatives in late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(3). 139-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Active, middle, and passive: The morpho-syntax of voice. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 13. 19-40.10.5565/rev/catjl.153]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, Mark. 2008. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351-374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.132.16bak]Search in Google Scholar
[Benett, Paul A. 1981. The evolution of passive and disposal sentences. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9(1). 61-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Teresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2007. Disharmonic word-order systems and the final-over-final-constraint (FOFC). In Antonietta Bisetto & Francesco E. Barbieri (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 86-105. Bologna: Università di Bologna.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 169-225.10.1162/LING_a_00153]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa & Michelle Sheehan. 2012. Disharmony, antisymmetry, and the final-over-final constraint. In Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds.), Ways of structure building, 206-244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644933.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110808506]Search in Google Scholar
[Chao, Yuen-ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 2007. Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds.), The copy theory of movement, 151-174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.107.07che]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Creissels, Denis. 2005. SVOX constituent order and constituent order alternations in West African languages. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 1-15, Berkeley.10.3765/bls.v31i2.3189]Search in Google Scholar
[Djamouri, Redouane, Waltraud Paul & John Whitman. 2013. Syntactic change in Chinese and the argument-adjunct asymmetry. In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, vol. 2, 577-594. Taipei: Academia Sinica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Epstein, Samuel David, Erich Groat, Ruriko Kawashima & Hisatsugu Kitahara. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feng, Shengli. 2000. Hanyu yunlü jufa xue [Prosodic syntax in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai education press].]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, Danny. 1995. Economy and scope. Natural Language Semantics 3(3). 283-341.10.1007/BF01248820]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, Danny & David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31. 1-45.10.1515/thli.2005.31.1-2.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Geuder, Wilhelm. 2004. Depictives and transparent adverbs. In Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg & Gisa Rauh (eds.), Adverbials: The interplay between meaning, context, and syntactic structure, 131-166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.70.06geu]Search in Google Scholar
[Haig, Geoffrey. 2001. Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia: From top to bottom. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 192-224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198299813.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 19. 53-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.), Control and grammar, 109-147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-7959-9_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1994. More on Chinese word order and parametric theory. In Barbara Lust, Margarita Suñer & John Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives, vol. 1, Heads, projections, and learnability,15-35. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 2006a. Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 253. 1-43.10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2006.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 2006b. The macro-history of Chinese syntax and the theory of change. Paper presented at the Chinese Linguistics Workshop, University of Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-tien Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a crosslinguistic perspective, 1-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James & Ian Roberts. 2017. Principles and parameters of Universal Grammar. In Ian Roberts (ed.), Oxford handbook of universal grammar, 307-354. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.14]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard. 2004. Antisymmetry and Japanese. In Lyle Jenkins (ed.), Variation and universals in biolinguistics, 3-37. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780080474748_004]Search in Google Scholar
[Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The syntax of verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koopman, Hilda. 1992. On the absence of case chains in Bambara. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10(4). 555-594.10.1007/BF00133330]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Serving the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuo, Pei-jung. 2010. Transitivity and the ba construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 8(1). 95-128.]Search in Google Scholar
[Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335-391.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Hui-chi. 2008. Obligatory object shift in Taiwanese Southern Min. In Shin-mei Kao & Shelley Ching-yu Hsieh (eds.), NCKU FLLD Monograph series vol. 1: Languages across cultures, 151-170. Tainan: National Cheng Kung University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1985. Abstract case in Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: USC dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1987. Duration phrases: Distributions and interpretation. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 22(3). 27-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 2006. Chinese ba. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. I, 375-468. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liao, Wei-wen. 2017. Remarks on the final-over-final condition: A view from Chinese head-final structures. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 38(2). 93-118.10.1515/scl-2017-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine, CA: UC Irvine dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lü, Shu-xiang. 1980. Xiandai hanyu babaici [Eight hundred words in Modern Mandarin]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan [The commercial press].]Search in Google Scholar
[Matsuoka, Mikinari. 2013. On the notion of subject for subject-oriented adverbs. Language 89(3). 586-618.10.1353/lan.2013.0047]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. Oxon: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mei, Tsu-lin. 1990. Tang, Song chuzhishi de laiyuan [The origin of the Tang and Song disposal construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 216. 191-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mulder, René & Rint Sybesma. 1992. Chinese is a VO language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10(3). 439-476.10.1007/BF00133370]Search in Google Scholar
[Özsoy, A. Sumru. 2001. On ‘small’ clauses, other bare verbal complements and feature checking in Turkish. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish, 213-237. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.44.09sum]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338775]Search in Google Scholar
[Peyraube, Alain. 1996. Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C.-T. James Huang & Y.-H. Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161-214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Reinhart Tanya. 1997. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program. Natural Language Semantics 6(1). 29-56.10.1023/A:1008240014550]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, Marc. 2004. Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, Marc. 2007. Dynamic linearization and the shape of phases. Linguistic Analysis 33. 209-237.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, Marc. 2008. Desymmetrization: Parametric variation at the PF-interface. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 53. 275-300.10.1017/S0008413100004497]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, Ian. 2014. Syntactic change. In Andrew Carnie, Dan Siddiqi & Yosuke Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 391-408. Abingdon: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saito, Mamoru & Naoki Fukui. 1998. Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3). 439-474.10.1162/002438998553815]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheehan, Michelle. 2013. Some implications of a copy theory of labeling. Syntax 16(4). 362-396.10.1111/synt.12010]Search in Google Scholar
[Sybesma, Rint. 1992. Causatives and accomplishments: The case of the Chinese ba. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-9163-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. A complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics 39(2). 257-295.10.1515/ling.2001.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. Yueyu yufa jiangyi [Lectures on Cantonese grammar]. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teng, Shou-hsin. 1975. Predicate movements in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3(1). 60-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vikner, Sten. 2006. Object shift. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. III, 392-436. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch46]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei, Pei-chuan. 1993. Gu Hanyu jieci “yu” de yanbian lüeshi [A brief history of the development of the preposition yu in Ancient Chinese]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 62. 717-786.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Cheng. 2002. Hanyu jieci cizu cixu de lishi yanbian [The historical evolution of the word order of prepositional phrases in Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Yuyan Wenhua Daxue Chubanshe [Beijing Language and Culture University press].]Search in Google Scholar
