A GATE Monte Carlo model for a newly developed small animal PET scanner: the IRI-microPET

[1] Merheb C, Petegnief Y, Talbot N. Full modeling of the MOSAIC animal PET system based on the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(3):563-576.10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/002Search in Google Scholar

[2] Merheb C, Nicol S, Petegnief Y et al. Assessment of the Mosaic animal PET system response using list-mode data for validation of Gate Mote Carlo modeling. Nucl Inst Meth A. 2006;569(2):220-224.10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.125Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rannou FR, Kohli V, Prout DL, et al. Investigation of OPET performance using GATE, a Geant4-based simulation software. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2004;51(5):2713-2717.10.1109/TNS.2004.835737Search in Google Scholar

[4] Schmidtlein CR, Kirov AS, Nehmeh SA, et al. Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulation of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners. Med Phys. 2006;33(1):198-208.10.1118/1.2089447Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lamare F, Turzo A, Bizais Y et al. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using Gate. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(4):943-962.10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/013Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kim JS, Lee JS, Park MJ, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Three MicroPET Series Systems Using Mont Carlo Simulation: Sensitivity and Scatter Fraction. IEEE Nucl Sci Sym Conf. 2007;4534-4535.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Islami rad SZ, Gholipour Peyvandi R, Askari lehdarboni M, Ghafari AA. Design and performance evaluation of a high resolution IRI-microPET preclinical scanner. Nucl Instr and Meth A. 2015;781:6-13.10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.093Search in Google Scholar

[8] Islami rad SZ, Shamsaei Zafarghandi M, Gholipour Peyvandi R et al. Study of the Slow-Fast preamplifier input parameters effects on output image for LYSO scintillator with PS-PMT based animal PET. Instr & Exp Tech. 2014;57(4):488-493.10.1134/S0020441214040034Search in Google Scholar

[9] GEANT4 Collaboration, GEANT4: A simulation toolkit, Jun (2009).Search in Google Scholar

[10] Canadas M, Embid M, Lage E, et al. NEMA NU 4-2008 performance measurements of two commercial small animal PET scanners: Clear PET and rPET-1. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2011;58(1):58-65.10.1109/TNS.2010.2072935Search in Google Scholar

[11] Yang Y, Tai Y, Siegel C, et al. Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(12):2527-2545.10.1088/0031-9155/49/12/005Search in Google Scholar

[12] Motta A, Damiani C, Del Guerra A, et al. Use of a fast EM algorithm for 3D image reconstruction with the YAP-PET tomograph. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2002;26(5):293-302.10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00034-4Search in Google Scholar

[13] Constantinescu CC, Mukherjee J. Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(9):2885-2899.10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/020283876719384008Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fahey FH. Data Acquisition in PET Imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2002;30(2):39-49.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jiang M, Wang G. Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART). IEEE Trans Imag Process. 2003;12(8): 957-961.10.1109/TIP.2003.81529518237969Search in Google Scholar

[16] Herman GT. Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projections. Springer (2009).Search in Google Scholar

[17] Gholipour Peyvandi R, Islami rad SZ, Heshmati R, et al. Influence of projection steps on image quality using single source–single detector gamma ray tomograph. Instr and Exp Tech. 2011;54(4):542-547.10.1134/S0020441211040038Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lodge MA, Rahmim A, Wahl RL. Simultaneous measurement of noise and spatial resolution in PET phantom images. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(4):1069-1081.10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/011307268720107244Search in Google Scholar