Accesso libero

Changes in Migration to Rural Regions in The Czech Republic: Position and Perspectives

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

ANTROP, M. (2004): Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 67, p. 9-26.10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4Search in Google Scholar

BARTOŠ, M, KUŠOVÁ, D. (2005): „Amenitní“ migrace jako specifická forma globální migrace obyvatel a její vliv na kvalitu života. Životné prostredie, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 315-318.Search in Google Scholar

BARTOŠ, M., KUŠOVÁ, D., TĚŠITEL, J. (2009): Motivation and life style of the Czech amenity migrants (case study). European Countryside, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 164-179.10.2478/v10091-009-0014-4Search in Google Scholar

BARTOŠ, M., KUŠOVÁ, D., TĚŠITEL, J. (2005): Amenity migration and tourism. In: Hasman, M., Šittler, E. [eds.]: Sustainable development and Tourism. Tábor: Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Travel Trade, p. 7-21.Search in Google Scholar

BARTOŠ, M., KUŠOVÁ, D., TĚŠITEL, J., KOPP, J., NOVOTNÁ, M. (2008): Amenity migration in the context of landscapeecological research. Journal of Landscape Ecology (CZ-IALE), Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 5-21.10.2478/v10285-012-0006-3Search in Google Scholar

BARTOŠ, M. et al. (2011): Amenitní migrace do venkovských oblastí České republiky. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Lesnická práce, 196 p.Search in Google Scholar

BERRY, B. (1976): The counterurbanization process: urban America since 1970. In: Berry, B. [ed.]: Urbanisation and Counterurbanisation. Beverly Hills, California, Sage, p. 17-30.Search in Google Scholar

BIČÍK, I., FIALOVÁ, D., VÁGNER, J. (2001): Druhé bydlení v Česku. Praha, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 167 pp.Search in Google Scholar

BOYLE, P., HALFACREE, K. [eds.] (1998): Migration into Rural Area. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 330 p.Search in Google Scholar

BROWN, D. L., SCHAFFT, K. A. (2002): Population deconcentration in Hungary during the post-socialist transformation. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 18, p. 233-244.10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00046-8Search in Google Scholar

BROWN, L. (1993): Rural community satisfaction and attachment in mass consumer society. Rural sociology, Vol. 58, p. 387-403.Search in Google Scholar

BURT, J., BARBER, G. M., RIGBY, D. L. (2009): Elementary statistic for geographers. New York, London, The Guilford Press, 653 pp.Search in Google Scholar

ČERMÁK, Z. HAMPL, M., MÜLLER, J. (2009): Současné tendence vývoje obyvatelstva metropolitních areálů v Česku: dochází k významnému obratu? Geografie, Vol. 114, No. 1., p. 37-51.Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ (2008): Databáze demografických údajů za obce ČR. Plzeň: Český statistický úřad. (zpracování na objednávku - Depon. Katedra geografie FPE ZČU v Plzni).Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ (2011): Databáze demografických údajů za obce ČR. [online]. Český statistický úřad, Praha. [cit. 20. 2.2011]. Available at: URL: < http://www.czso.cz/cz/obce_d/index.htm >. Drbohlav, D. (2001): Evropa a proces mezinárodní migrace. Institut pro evropskou politiku Europeum, Praha [online] [cit.10.09.2010]. Available at: URL: <www.europeum.org>.Search in Google Scholar

DRGOŇA, V., TURNOCK, D. (2000): Policies for rural Eastern Europe in transition: The case of Slovakia. GeoJournal, Vol. 50, p. 235-247.10.1023/A:1007149431025Search in Google Scholar

FIELDING, A. (1992): Migration social mobility: South East England as an „escalator region“. Regional Studies, Vol. 26, p. 1-15.10.1080/00343409212331346741Search in Google Scholar

FIELDING, T. (1998): Counterurbanization and social class. In: Boyle, P., Halfacree, K. [eds.]: Migration into Rural Areas. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, p. 41-60.Search in Google Scholar

FLOGNFELDT, J. (2006): Second homes, work commuting and amenity migrants in Norway’s mountain areas, In: Moss, L. A. G. [ed.]: The amenity migrants: Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. Wallingford, UK and Cambridge, USA, CABI Publishing, p. 232-244.Search in Google Scholar

GEYER, H. S., KONTULY, T. M. (1993): A Theoretical Foundation for the Concept of Differential Urbanization. International Regional Science Review, Vol. 17, p. 157-177.10.1177/016001769301500202Search in Google Scholar

GLORIOSO, S. (1999): Amenity migration in the Šumava bioregion, Czech Republic: Implications for ecological integrity. In: Gode, P. M., Price, M. F, Zimmermann. F. M. [eds.]: Tourism and development in mountain regions. Wellingford, CABI Publishing, p. 275-295.Search in Google Scholar

GORLACH, K., LOŠŤÁK, M., MOONEY, P. H. (2008): Agriculture, communities, and new social movements: East European ruralities in the process of restructuring. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 24, p. 161-171.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.003Search in Google Scholar

HALLIDAY, J., COOMBES, M. (1995): In search of counterurbanization: some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 11, p. 433-446.10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1Search in Google Scholar

EGAN, A., LULOFF, A. E. (2000): The exurbanization of America's forests-research in rural social science. Journal of Forestry, Vol. 88, No. 3, p. 26-30.Search in Google Scholar

ESCRIBANO, M. J. R. (2007): Migration to rural Navarre: questioning the experience of counterurbanization. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 98, No. 1, p. 32- 41.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00374.xSearch in Google Scholar

HANOUSEK, J., KOČENDA, E., SVEJNAR, J. (2007): Origin and concentration: Corporate ownership, control and performance in firms after privatization. Economics of transition, Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 1-31.Search in Google Scholar

CHAMPION, T. (1998): Studying counterurbanization and the rural population turnaround. In: Boyle, P., Halfacree K. [eds.]: Migration into Rural Areas. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, p. 21-40.Search in Google Scholar

CHAMPION, T. (2001): Urbanization, Suburbanization, Counterurbanization and Reurbanization. In: Paddison, R. [ed.]: Handbook of Urban Studies. Sage Publications, London, s. 143-161.10.4135/9781848608375.n9Search in Google Scholar

CHIPENIUK, R. (2004): Planning for amenity migration in Canada: current capacities of interior British Columbian mountain communities. Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 24, p. 327-335.10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0327:PFAMIC]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

KOK, H. (1999): Migration from the city to the countryside in Hungary and Poland. GeoJournal, Vol. 49, p. 53-62.10.1023/A:1007092228633Search in Google Scholar

KONTULY, T. (1998): Contrasting the counterurbanization experience in European nations. In: Boyle P., Halfacree K. [eds.]: Migration into Rural Areas. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, p. 61-78.Search in Google Scholar

KONTULY, T., GEYER, H. S. (2003): Lessons Learned from Testing the Differential Urbanisation Model. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 94, No. 1, p. 124-128.10.1111/1467-9663.00242Search in Google Scholar

KOPP, J., NOVOTNÁ, M. (2008): Krajinně-ekologické a environmentální změny na Plzeňsku v transformačním období. In: Dubcová, A., Krogmann, A. [eds.]: Geografické informácie 12. Nitra, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre, p. 16-23.Search in Google Scholar

KUŠOVÁ, D., TĚŠITEL, J., MATĚJKA, K., BARTOŠ, M. (2008): Biosphere reserves - An attempt to form sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 84, No. 1, p. 38-51.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.006Search in Google Scholar

LIBROVÁ, H. (1994): Pestří a zelení - kapitoly o dobrovolné skromnosti. Brno: Veronica, 218 pp.Search in Google Scholar

LIBROVÁ, H. (1996): Decentralizace osídlení - vize a realita. Část první: vize, postoje k venkovu a potenciální migrace v ČR. Sociologický časopis, Vol. 33, No. 1, p. 27-40.Search in Google Scholar

LIBROVÁ, H. (1997): Decentralizace osídlení - vize a realita. Část druhá: decentralizace v realitě České republiky. Sociologický časopis, Vol. 32, No. 3, p. 285-296.Search in Google Scholar

LIBROVÁ, H. (2003): Vlažní a váhaví. Brno, Doplněk Publishing, 320 pp.Search in Google Scholar

LUX, M., SUNEGA, P. (2010): The future of housing systems after the transition - The case of the Czech Republic. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 43, p. 221-231.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

LUX, M., SUNEGA, P., MIKESZOVÁ, M., MATYÁŠ, F. (2006): Analýza opatření bytové politiky směřující k podpoře flexibility práce v ČR. 2. díl - výsledky empirických šetření. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR. 132 pp.Search in Google Scholar

MAJEROVÁ, V. et al. (2006): Sociologie venkova a zemědělství. Praha, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze. 254 pp.Search in Google Scholar

MITCHELL, C. J. A. (2004): Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 20, p. 15-34.10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7Search in Google Scholar

MOSS, L. A. G. (1994): Beyond Tourism: The Amenity Migrants, in Coherence and Chaos: Visions, Means, Action. In: Mannermaa, M., Inayatullah, S., Slaughter, R. [eds.]: School of Economics Turku, Finland, p. 125-137.Search in Google Scholar

MOSS, L. A. G. [ed.] (2006): The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. Wallingford, UK and Cambridge, USA, CABI Publishing, 336 pp.10.1079/9780851990842.0000Search in Google Scholar

MÜLLER, J. (2005): Venkov očima geografa. In: Venkov, jeho proměny a územní plánování. Telč: Asociace urbanismu a územního plánování ČR, p. 4-11.Search in Google Scholar

MÜLLER, J. (2009): Změny a trendy ve vývoji osídlení po roce 1990. Urbanismus a územní vývoj, Vol. 12, No. 4 Supplement, p. 11-16.Search in Google Scholar

MÜLLER, D. K. (2006): Amenity migration and tourism development in the Tärna Mountains, Sweden, In: Moss, L. A. G. [ed.]: The amenity migrants: Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures, Wallingford, UK and Cambridge, USA, CABI Publishing. p. 45-58.Search in Google Scholar

OUŘEDNÍČEK, M. (2007): Differential Suburban Development in the Prague Urban Region. Geografiska Annaler - series B. Human Geography, Vol. 89, No. 2, p. 111-125.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.xSearch in Google Scholar

OUŘEDNÍČEK, M. (2000): Teorie stádií vývoje měst a diferenciální urbanizace. Geografie, Vol. 105, No. 4, p. 361-369.Search in Google Scholar

PAVLÍK, Z., KUČERA. Z. [eds.] (2002): Populační vývoj České republiky 1990-2002. Praha, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 98 pp.Search in Google Scholar

PERLÍN, R., BIČÍK. I. [eds.] (2010): Lokální rozvoj na Šumavě: závěrečná publikace shrnující výsledky projektu Analýza vývoje Národního parku Šumava za období uplynulých 15 let. Sborník z výzkumu na Šumavě, Vol. 4,Vimperk, Správa NP a CHKO Šumava, 187 pp.Search in Google Scholar

PERLÍN, R., KUČEROVÁ, S., KUČERA, Z. (2010): Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie, Vol. 115, No. 2, p. 161-187.Search in Google Scholar

REINÖHLOVÁ, E. (2005): Informační a komunikační technologie pro rozvoj periferních oblastí. In: Novotná, M. [ed.]: Problémy periferních oblastí. Praha, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, p. 36-43.Search in Google Scholar

SLEPIČKA, A. (1981): Venkov a/nebo město, lidé, sídla krajina. Praha: Svoboda, 367 pp.Search in Google Scholar

STEWART, S. I. (2002): Amenity migration. In: Luft, K., MacDonald, S. [eds.]: 5th Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Trends Symposium. Michigan State University Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Lansing MI, p. 369-378.Search in Google Scholar

ŠIMON, M. (2006): Teoretické přístupy ke studiu urbanizace. Karlova univerzita v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje. 43 pp. [www.urbanizace.cz - 20.06.2008].Search in Google Scholar

ŠIMON, M., OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., NOVÁK, J. (2009): Search of Counterurbanization: Some Evidence from the Czech Republic. 3rd International Workshop on Post-communist Urban Geographies: Actors Shaping Urban Change, 17. 9. 2009, Tartu, Estonsko, MS.Search in Google Scholar

ŠIMON, M. (2011): Kontraurbanizace: Chaotický koncept? Geografie, Vol. 116, No. 3., p. 231-255.Search in Google Scholar

ŠIMON M. (2012): Exploring Counterurbanization in a Post-Socialist Context: Case of the Czech Republic. Sociologia ruralis. Article first published online: 11 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00576.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00576.xSearch in Google Scholar

TAMMARU, T. (2003): Urban and rural population chase in Estonia: patterns of differentiated and undifferentiated urbanisation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 94, No. 1, p. 112-123.10.1111/1467-9663.00241Search in Google Scholar

TEMELOVÁ, J., NOVÁK, J., POSPÍŠILOVÁ, L., DVOŘÁKOVÁ, N. (2011): Každodenní život, denní mobilita a adaptační strategie v periferních lokalitách. Sociologický časopis, Vol. 43, No. 4, p. 831-858.10.13060/00380288.2011.47.4.09Search in Google Scholar

TĚŠITEL, J., KUŠOVÁ, D., BARTOŠ, M. (1999): Non marginal parameters of marginal areas. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 39-46.Search in Google Scholar

VÁGNER, J., FIALOVÁ, D. et al. (2004): Regionální diferenciace druhého bydlení v Česku. Praha, Univerzita Karlova, 286 pp.Search in Google Scholar

WALMSLEY, D. J., EPPS, W. R., DUNCAN, C. J. (1998): Migration to the New South Wales North Coast 1986-1991: Lifestyle Motivated Counterurbanization. Geoforum, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 105-118. 10.1016/S0016-7185(97)00023-7Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1210-8812
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Business and Economics, Business Management, Industries, Environmental Management, Geosciences, Geography