<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The premise of this paper is that there are three distinct and hierarchical ‘categories of knowledge’ (Pharoah 2018). The first of these is physiological knowledge which is acquired over generations through the interaction between replicating lineages and the environment. This interaction facilitates the evolution of meaningful physiological structures, forms, functions, and qualitative ascriptions. Second, there is phenomenal knowledge which is qualified by the utilisation of real-time experience to effect an individuated spatiotemporal subjective perspective. This capability requires sophisticated cognitive capabilities. Conceptual knowledge is the third category and constitutes a network of abstracted principles about the spatiotemporal and phenomenal world of experience. From this starting premise, I argue that human knowledge can still be viewed as impoverished because of the absence of the next category which has not yet emerged. I suggest that this category will be apparent when a fuller understanding is acquired concerning the dynamic nature of concept construction and structuring. This will demand a transdisciplinary and multimodal approach.</p></abstract>

The premise of this paper is that there are three distinct and hierarchical ‘categories of knowledge’ (Pharoah 2018). The first of these is physiological knowledge which is acquired over generations through the interaction between replicating lineages and the environment. This interaction facilitates the evolution of meaningful physiological structures, forms, functions, and qualitative ascriptions. Second, there is phenomenal knowledge which is qualified by the utilisation of real-time experience to effect an individuated spatiotemporal subjective perspective. This capability requires sophisticated cognitive capabilities. Conceptual knowledge is the third category and constitutes a network of abstracted principles about the spatiotemporal and phenomenal world of experience. From this starting premise, I argue that human knowledge can still be viewed as impoverished because of the absence of the next category which has not yet emerged. I suggest that this category will be apparent when a fuller understanding is acquired concerning the dynamic nature of concept construction and structuring. This will demand a transdisciplinary and multimodal approach.

Advancements in the Evolution of Human Capacities to Know

Linguistic Frontiers

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Advancements in the Evolution of Human Capacities to Know"}

The premise of this paper is that there are three distinct and hierarchical ‘categories of knowledge’ (Pharoah 2018). The first of these is physiological...

Advancements in the Evolution of Human Capacities to Know

Pubblicato online: 31 dic 2020

Pagine: 66 - 69

Ricevuto: 01 lug 2020

Accettato: 01 set 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2020-0016

Parole chiave
Conceptual knowledge, phenomenal knowledge, physiological knowledge, ontological hierarchy, discourse, equilibria

© 2020 Mark C Pharoah, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Advancements in the Evolution of Human Capacities to Know

Pubblicato online: 31 dic 2020

Pagine: 66 - 69

Ricevuto: 01 lug 2020

Accettato: 01 set 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2020-0016

Parole chiaveConceptual knowledge, phenomenal knowledge, physiological knowledge, ontological hierarchy, discourse, equilibria

© 2020 Mark C Pharoah, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Parole chiave
Conceptual knowledge, phenomenal knowledge, physiological knowledge, ontological hierarchy, discourse, equilibria