Article Category: Research Paper
Pubblicato online: 07 dic 2018
Pagine: 31 - 44
Ricevuto: 03 set 2018
Accettato: 25 ott 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0019
Parole chiave
© 2018 Janne Pölönen, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Publication type classification in VIRTA publication information service.
| Scientific publications |
| A1 Peer-reviewed journal article, original research |
| A2 Peer-reviewed journal article, review |
| A3 Peer-reviewed article or chapter in book |
| A4 Peer-reviewed article in conference proceedings |
| B1 Non-peer-reviewed journal article |
| B2 Non-peer-reviewed article or chapter in book |
| B3 Non-peer-reviewed article in conference proceedings |
| C1 Monograph (peer-reviewed) |
| C2 Edited book or special issue (peer-reviewed) |
| Professional publications |
| D1 Article in a trade journal |
| D2 Article in a professional book |
| D3 Article in professional conference proceedings |
| D4 Published development or research report or study |
| D5 Textbook, professional manual or guide |
| D6 Edited professional book |
| Publications for the general public |
| E1 Popularised article, newspaper article |
| E2 Popularised monograph |
| E3 Edited popularised book |
Universities’ funding model 2017–2020.
| Performance indicators | Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Education | 41 |
Master’s degrees | 13 |
Bachelors’ degrees | 6 |
Study credits in open university, specialization studies, studies based on cooperation and in non-degree programmes | 2 |
Number of students who have gained at least 55 study credits | 10 |
Student feedback | 3 |
Number of employed graduates | 2 |
Master’s degrees awarded to foreign nationals | 1 |
Student mobility to and from Finland | 2 |
| Research | 33 |
PhD degrees | 9 |
Scientific publications | 13 |
International teaching and research staff | 2 |
Competed research funding | 9 |
| Other education and science policy objectives | 28 |
Strategic development | 12 |
Field-specific funding | 9 |
National duties | 7 |
Publication Forum authority list of publication channels in 2018.
| Publication Forum level | Journals/series | Book publishers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 654 | 15 |
| 2 | 2,242 | 91 |
| 1 | 19,837 | 1,203 |
| 0 | 5,047 | 1,710 |
| All | 27,780 | 3,019 |
Weight of publications in the funding model since 2017–2020.
| Publication type | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed monograph (C1) | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0.4 | |
| Peer-reviewed article in journal (A1–2) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.1 | |
| Peer-reviewed article in book (A3) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.1 | |
| Peer-reviewed article in proceedings (A4) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.1 | |
| Peer-reviewed edited work (C2) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.1 | |
| Not-peer-reviewed monographs | 0.4 | ||||
| Not-peer-reviewed articles and edited work | 0.1 |
Weight of publications in the funding model 2015–2016.
| Publication type | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed monograph (C1) | 12 | 12 | 6 | 4 | |
| Peer-reviewed article in journal (A1–2) | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 1 | |
| Peer-reviewed article in book (A3) | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 1 | |
| Peer-reviewed article in proceedings (A4) | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 1 | |
| Not-peer-reviewed monographs | 0.4 | ||||
| Not-peer-reviewed articles | 0.1 |
UNIFI working-group’s SWOT analysis of a publication forum-based system.
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
promotes quality | burdensome expert-panel organisation |
quality defined by research community | panels tie human resources |
sensitive to different publishing practices | requires harmonization of publication data |
could be established e.g. only for SSH fields | renewal of field-classification (in Finland) |
transparent indication of quality | validity may differ between fields |
takes into account quantity and quality | |
comprehensive information for all fields | |
dynamic system that can be updated | |
| Opportunities | Threats |
current data about research quality | experts privilege channels of national interest |
supports research assessments | over quality in ratings |
steering and management | ensuring commensurability |
field and subfield specific analyses | difficult to reach consensus about ratings |