This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bastiat, F. (1848), Government, retrieved from http://bastiat.org/en/government.html [25th March 2019].BastiatF.1848Governmentretrieved from http://bastiat.org/en/government.html [25th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Baxter, P., Jack, S. (2008), Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers, The Qualitative Report, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 544–559.BaxterP.JackS.2008Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchersThe Qualitative Report13454455910.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573Search in Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (2002a), Free trade today, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.BhagwatiJ.2002aFree trade todayPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJSearch in Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (2002b), Going alone: the case for relaxed reciprocity in freeing trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.BhagwatiJ.2002bGoing alone: the case for relaxed reciprocity in freeing tradeMIT PressCambridge, MA10.7551/mitpress/3318.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J.N., Krishna, P., Panagariya, A. (2014), The world trade system: trends and challenges, 3 May. Unpublished Paper, Department of Economics, Columbia University, retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~jb38/papers/pdf/paper1-the_world_trading_system.pdf [18th March 2019].BhagwatiJ.N.KrishnaP.PanagariyaA.2014The world trade system: trends and challenges3MayUnpublished Paper,Department of Economics, Columbia Universityretrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~jb38/papers/pdf/paper1-the_world_trading_system.pdf [18th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Böhm, F. (1961), Demokratie und ökonomische Macht, in: Institut für ausländisches und internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, (Ed), Kartelle und Monopole im modernen Recht, Müller, Karlsruhe, pp. 1–24.BöhmF.1961Demokratie und ökonomische Machtin:Institut für ausländisches und internationales Wirtschaftsrecht(Ed),Kartelle und Monopole im modernen RechtMüllerKarlsruhe124Search in Google Scholar
Boldrin, M., Levine, D.K. (2008), Against intellectual monopoly, Cambridge University Press, New York.BoldrinM.LevineD.K.2008Against intellectual monopolyCambridge University PressNew York10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2546-1Search in Google Scholar
Butler, E. (2010), Austrian economics: a primer, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.ButlerE.2010Austrian economics: a primerInstitute of Economic AffairsLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Butler, E. (2015), Classical liberalism: a primer, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.ButlerE.2015Classical liberalism: a primerInstitute of Economic AffairsLondon10.2139/ssrn.3893747Search in Google Scholar
Ciuriak, D., Xiao, J., Dadkhah, A. (2017), Quantifying the comprehensive and progressive agreement for trans-pacific partnership, East Asian Economic Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 343–384.10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2017.21.4.334CiuriakD.XiaoJ.DadkhahA.2017Quantifying the comprehensive and progressive agreement for trans-pacific partnershipEast Asian Economic Review214343384Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cobden, R. (1919), The international man, Holt, New York.CobdenR.1919The international manHoltNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. (2018), The importance of level-playing field in international trade and investment, retrieved from https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/Bilder_och_dokument/importancelevelplayingfield_180620pdf_714286.html/BINARY/ImportanceLevelPlayingField_180620.pdf [22nd March 2019].Confederation of Swedish Enterprise2018The importance of level-playing field in international trade and investmentretrieved from https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/Bilder_och_dokument/importancelevelplayingfield_180620pdf_714286.html/BINARY/ImportanceLevelPlayingField_180620.pdf [22nd March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F.Y. (1908), Appreciations of mathematical theories, Economic Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 541–556.10.2307/2220622EdgeworthF.Y.1908Appreciations of mathematical theoriesEconomic Journal18541556Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532–550.10.5465/amr.1989.4308385EisenhardtK.M.1989Building theories from case study researchAcademy of Management Review144532550Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
EU Commission. (2017a), Reflection paper on harnessing globalization, European Commission, Brussels, retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/reflection-paper-globalisation_en.pdf [25th March 2019].EU Commission2017aReflection paper on harnessing globalizationEuropean CommissionBrusselsretrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/reflection-paper-globalisation_en.pdf [25th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
EU Commission. (2017b), Guide to the comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA), Luxembourg, retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156062.pdf [15th March 2019].EU Commission2017bGuide to the comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA)Luxembourgretrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156062.pdf [15th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
EUR-Lex. (2019), Economic and trade agreement between Canada and the European Union, retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:4298972 [25th March 2019].EUR-Lex2019Economic and trade agreement between Canada and the European Unionretrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:4298972 [25th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (1973), Law, legislation and liberty, Vol. 1: rules and order, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.HayekF.A.1973Law, legislation and liberty, Vol. 1: rules and orderUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoSearch in Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (1978), Competition as a discovery procedure, in: F.A. Hayek, (Ed), New studies in philosophy, politics, and economics and the history of ideas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 179–190.HayekF.A.1978Competition as a discovery procedurein:HayekF.A.(Ed),New studies in philosophy, politics, and economics and the history of ideasUniversity of Chicago PressChicago17919010.4324/9781315161921-9Search in Google Scholar
Helble, M. (2017), Salvaging the trans-pacific partnership: building blocks for multilateral trade opening? ADBI Working Paper 695, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/234081/adbi-wp695.pdf [18th March 2018].HelbleM.2017Salvaging the trans-pacific partnership: building blocks for multilateral trade opening?ADBI Working Paper 695,Asian Development Bank InstituteTokyoretrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/234081/adbi-wp695.pdf [18th March 2018].Search in Google Scholar
Ikenson, D. (2018), NAFTA 2.0: the best trade agreement ever negotiated (except for all of the others), Cato at Liberty, October 8 2018, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C., retrieved from https://www.cato.org/blog/nafta-20-best-trade-agreement-ever-negotiated-except-all-others; https://fee.org/articles/nafta-20-the-best-trade-agreement-ever-negotiated-except-for-all-of-the-others/ [25th March 2019].IkensonD.2018NAFTA 2.0: the best trade agreement ever negotiated (except for all of the others)Cato at LibertyOctober82018Cato InstituteWashington, D.C.retrieved from https://www.cato.org/blog/nafta-20-best-trade-agreement-ever-negotiated-except-all-others; https://fee.org/articles/nafta-20-the-best-trade-agreement-ever-negotiated-except-for-all-of-the-others/ [25th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Ikenson, D., Lester, S., Hannan, D. (2018), The ideal U.S.-U.K. free trade agreement. A free trader’s perspective, Cato Institute and Initiative for Free Trade, Washington, D.C., retrieved from https://www.cato.org/publications/white-paper/ideal-us-uk-free-trade-agreement-free-traders-perspective, [15th March 2019].IkensonD.LesterS.HannanD.2018The ideal U.S.-U.K. free trade agreement. A free trader’s perspectiveCato Institute and Initiative for Free TradeWashington, D.C.retrieved from https://www.cato.org/publications/white-paper/ideal-us-uk-free-trade-agreement-free-traders-perspective, [15th March 2019].10.2139/ssrn.3853574Search in Google Scholar
Ikenson, D.J., Lester, S., Lincicome, S., Pearson, D.R., Watson, K.W. (2016), Should free traders support the transpacific partnership? An assessment of America’s largest preferential trade agreement, Cato Working Paper No. 39, September 12, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C., retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/working-paper-39_3.pdf [18th March 2019].IkensonD.J.LesterS.LincicomeS.PearsonD.R.WatsonK.W.2016Should free traders support the transpacific partnership? An assessment of America’s largest preferential trade agreementCato Working Paper No. 39,September12Cato InstituteWashington, D.C.retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/working-paper-39_3.pdf [18th March 2019].10.2139/ssrn.2842266Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, D. (2015), Free trade under fire, 4th edn, Princeton University Press, Princeton.IrwinD.2015Free trade under fire4th ednPrinceton University PressPrincetonSearch in Google Scholar
Klein, P. (2017), Free trade versus “free trade”, Mises Wire, (23 January 2017), Ludwig Mises Institute, Auburn, AL, retrieved from: https://mises.org/wire/free-trade-versus-free-trade.KleinP.2017Free trade versus “free trade”Mises Wire23January2017Ludwig Mises InstituteAuburn, ALretrieved from: https://mises.org/wire/free-trade-versus-free-trade.Search in Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1997), What should trade negotiators negotiate about? A review essay, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 113–120, retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/negot.html [19th March 2019].KrugmanP.1997What should trade negotiators negotiate about? A review essayJournal of Economic Literature353113120retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/negot.html [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Lemieux, P. (2016), Free trade and TPP, retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2016/Lemieuxtpp.html.LemieuxP.2016Free trade and TPPretrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2016/Lemieuxtpp.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Lemieux, P. (2017a), Free trade agreements v unilateral free trade, retrieved from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2017/12/free_trade_agre.html.LemieuxP.2017aFree trade agreements v unilateral free traderetrieved from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2017/12/free_trade_agre.html.Search in Google Scholar
Lemieux, P. (2017b), Taking comparative advantage seriously, retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/archives/2017/11/taking_comparat.html.LemieuxP.2017bTaking comparative advantage seriouslyretrieved from http://www.econlib.org/archives/2017/11/taking_comparat.html.Search in Google Scholar
Lemieux, P. (2018a), What’s wrong with protectionism? Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.LemieuxP.2018aWhat’s wrong with protectionism?Mercatus Center at George Mason University, LanhamRowman & LittlefieldSearch in Google Scholar
Lemieux, P. (2018b), Is NAFTA 2.0 better than nothing? Regulation, Winter 2018–2019, Vol. 41, No. 4 pp. 12–15. Cato Institute, Washington, D.C., retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2018/12/regulation-v41n4-3.pdf. [19th March 2019].LemieuxP.2018bIs NAFTA 2.0 better than nothing?RegulationWinter2018–20194141215Cato InstituteWashington, D.C.retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2018/12/regulation-v41n4-3.pdf. [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J. (1821), Elements of political economy, Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, London, retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/mill-elements-of-political-economy-3rd-ed-1844 [29th March 2019].MillJ.1821Elements of political economyBaldwin, Cradock, and JoyLondonretrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/mill-elements-of-political-economy-3rd-ed-1844 [29th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Obama, B. (2016), The TPP would let America, not China, lead the way on global trade. Opinion article in The Washington Post, (May 2, 2016), retrieved from https://wita.org/article/the-washington-post-president-obama-the-tpp-would-let-america-not-china-lead-the-way-on-global-trade/ [18th March 2019].ObamaB.2016The TPP would let America, not China, lead the way on global trade. Opinion article in The Washington PostMay22016retrieved from https://wita.org/article/the-washington-post-president-obama-the-tpp-would-let-america-not-china-lead-the-way-on-global-trade/ [18th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Owen, J., Stojanovic, A., Rutter, J. (2017), Trade after Brexit. Options for the UK’s relationship with the EU, Institute for Government, London, retrieved from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/IFGJ5896-Brexit-Report-171214-final_0.pdf#page=15, [19th March 2019].OwenJ.StojanovicA.RutterJ.2017Trade after Brexit. Options for the UK’s relationship with the EUInstitute for GovernmentLondonretrieved from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/IFGJ5896-Brexit-Report-171214-final_0.pdf#page=15, [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1901), Traités de commerce, in: L. Say, de J. Chailley, (Eds), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Economie Politique, Paris: Guillaumin et Cie, Vol. II, pp. 1046–1050.ParetoV.1901Traités de commercein:SayL.Chailleyde J.(Eds),Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Economie PolitiqueParisGuillaumin et CieII10461050Search in Google Scholar
Peterson Institute for International Economics. (2016a), Assessing the trans-pacific partnership, volume 1: market access and sectoral issues, PIIE Briefings, No PIIEB16-1, February 2016, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., retrieved from https://piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/assessing-trans-pacific-partnership-volume-1-market-access-and-sectoral [19th March 2019].Peterson Institute for International Economics2016aAssessing the trans-pacific partnership, volume 1: market access and sectoral issuesPIIE Briefings, No PIIEB16-1, February 2016,Peterson Institute for International EconomicsWashington, D.C.retrieved from https://piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/assessing-trans-pacific-partnership-volume-1-market-access-and-sectoral [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Peterson Institute for International Economics. (2016b), Assessing the trans-pacific partnership, volume 2: innovations in trading rules, PIIE Briefings, No PIIEB16-4, March 2016, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., retrieved from https://piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/assessing-trans-pacific-partnership-volume-2-innovations-trading-rules [19th March 2019].Peterson Institute for International Economics2016bAssessing the trans-pacific partnership, volume 2: innovations in trading rulesPIIE Briefings, No PIIEB16-4, March 2016,Peterson Institute for International EconomicsWashington, D.C.retrieved from https://piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/assessing-trans-pacific-partnership-volume-2-innovations-trading-rules [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1817), The principles of political economy and taxation, John Murray, London.RicardoD.1817The principles of political economy and taxationJohn MurrayLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (2018), What is a ‘Canada-style’ trade deal? BBC World News, (September 25 2018), retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45633592 [19th March 2019].RobertsonJ.2018What is a ‘Canada-style’ trade deal?BBC World NewsSeptember252018retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45633592 [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1947), Essays in the theory of employment, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.RobinsonJ.1947Essays in the theory of employmentBasil BlackwellOxfordSearch in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2011), The globalization paradox: why global markets, states, and democracy can’t coexists, Oxford University Press, Oxford.RodrikD.2011The globalization paradox: why global markets, states, and democracy can’t coexistsOxford University PressOxfordSearch in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2018a), What do trade agreements really do? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 73–90, retrieved from https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/what_do_trade_agreements_really_do.pdf [15th March 2019].10.1257/jep.32.2.73RodrikD.2018aWhat do trade agreements really do?Journal of Economic Perspectives3227390retrieved from https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/what_do_trade_agreements_really_do.pdf [15th March 2019].Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2018b), Straight talk on trade: ideas for a Sane world economy, Princeton University Press, Oxford.RodrikD.2018bStraight talk on trade: ideas for a Sane world economyPrinceton University PressOxford10.1515/9781400888900Search in Google Scholar
Rönnbäck, K. (2015), Interest-group Lobbying for free trade: an empirical case study of international trade policy formation, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 281–293.10.1080/09638199.2014.884154RönnbäckK.2015Interest-group Lobbying for free trade: an empirical case study of international trade policy formationThe Journal of International Trade & Economic Development242281293Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.N. (1970/2018), Freedom, inequality, primitivism, and the division of labor, The Misis Institute, Auburn, AL, retrieved from https://mises.org/library/freedom-inequality-primitivism-and-division-labor [19th March 2019].RothbardM.N.1970/2018Freedom, inequality, primitivism, and the division of laborThe Misis InstituteAuburn, ALretrieved from https://mises.org/library/freedom-inequality-primitivism-and-division-labor [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.N. (1995), The NAFTA myth, in: M.N. Rothbard, (Ed), Making economic sense, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL, 2nd edn, 2006, pp. 375–378, retrieved from http://austrianeconomics.org/sites/default/files/Making%20Economic%20Sense_3.pdf, reprinted 2013 in https://mises.org/library/nafta-myth [20th March 2019].RothbardM.N.1995The NAFTA mythin:RothbardM.N.(Ed),Making economic senseLudwig von Mises InstituteAuburn, AL2nd edn2006375378retrieved from http://austrianeconomics.org/sites/default/files/Making%20Economic%20Sense_3.pdf, reprinted 2013 in https://mises.org/library/nafta-myth [20th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Sally, R. (2008), Trade policy, new century: the WTO, FTAs and Asia rising, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London, retrieved from http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/upldbook432pdf.pdf [25th March 2019].SallyR.2008Trade policy, new century: the WTO, FTAs and Asia risingThe Institute of Economic AffairsLondonretrieved from http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/upldbook432pdf.pdf [25th March 2019].10.2139/ssrn.1141825Search in Google Scholar
Say, J.-B. (1855), A treatise on political economy, Lippincott, Grambo & Co, Philadelphia, retrieved from https://www.econlib.org/library/Say/sayT.html?chapter_num=17#book-reader [29th March 2019].SayJ.-B.1855A treatise on political economyLippincott, Grambo & CoPhiladelphiaretrieved from https://www.econlib.org/library/Say/sayT.html?chapter_num=17#book-reader [29th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Shaffer, B. (2013), A libertarian critique of intellectual property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL, retrieved from https://mises.org/library/libertarian-critique-intellectual-property [19th March 2019].ShafferB.2013A libertarian critique of intellectual propertyLudwig von Mises InstituteAuburn, ALretrieved from https://mises.org/library/libertarian-critique-intellectual-property [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J.E. (2017), Globalization and its discontents revisited: anti-globalization in the era of trump, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.StiglitzJ.E.2017Globalization and its discontents revisited: anti-globalization in the era of trumpW. W. Norton & CompanyNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Torrey, Z. (2018), TPP 2.0: the deal without the US, The Diplomat, (February 3, 2018), retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/tpp-2-0-the-deal-without-the-us/ [22nd March 2019].TorreyZ.2018TPP 2.0: the deal without the USThe DiplomatFebruary32018retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/tpp-2-0-the-deal-without-the-us/ [22nd March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Chamber of Commerce. (2017), Level the playing field for trade, retrieved from https://www.uschamber.com/issue-brief/level-playing-field-trade [13th July 2019].U.S. Chamber of Commerce2017Level the playing field for traderetrieved from https://www.uschamber.com/issue-brief/level-playing-field-trade [13th July 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Wang, H. (2019), The future of deep free trade agreements: the convergence of TPP (and CPTPP) and CETA, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 317–342.WangH.2019The future of deep free trade agreements: the convergence of TPP (and CPTPP) and CETAJournal of World Trade53231734210.54648/TRAD2019015Search in Google Scholar
Whiting, T.K., Beaumont-Smith, G. (Eds) (2019), An analysis of the United States–Mexico–Canada agreement. Heritage Foundation. Backgrounder No. 3379, (January 28, 2019), The Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C, retrieved from https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/BG3379_0.pdf [19th March 2019].WhitingT.K.Beaumont-SmithG.(Eds)2019An analysis of the United States–Mexico–Canada agreement. Heritage FoundationBackgrounderNo. 3379,January282019The Heritage FoundationWashington, D.Cretrieved from https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/BG3379_0.pdf [19th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
WTO – World Trade Organization. (2019), Regional trade agreements, retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm [29th March 2019].WTO – World Trade Organization2019Regional trade agreementsretrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm [29th March 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2003), Case study research. Design and methods, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousands Oaks.YinR.K.2003Case study research. Design and methods3rd ednSageThousands OaksSearch in Google Scholar
