Reflections on Discussions About Technical Efficiency of Innovativeness of Countries

[1] Adam, F., 2014. Measuring National Innovation Performance. Heidelberg: Springer Briefs in Economics.10.1007/978-3-642-39464-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] Arundel, A., Hollanders, H., 2005. Policy Indicators and Targets: Measuring the Impact of Innovation Policies. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Balzat, M., Hanusch, H., 2004. Recent Trends in the Research on National Innovation Systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2), pp.197-210.10.1007/s00191-004-0187-ySearch in Google Scholar

[4] Balzat, M., Pyka, A., 2005. Mapping National Innovation Systems in the OECD Area [online] Available at: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/serien/lm/vwl_diskussionsreihe/279.pdf [Accessed February 1, 2019].10.1504/IJTG.2006.009132Search in Google Scholar

[5] Borrás, S., Edquist, Ch., 2016. Conceptual Underpinnings for Innovation Policy Design: Indicators and Instruments in Context. Unpublished paper prepared for the OECD Blue Sky Conference III, September 19-21 2016, Ghent, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Borrás, S., Edquist, Ch., 2013. The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments. CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy. Lund: Lund University.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Caballero, J.R., 2014. Measuring Innovation Efficiency in Europe. A Färe-Primont TFP Index Approach. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Department D’Economia Aplicada.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dahlman, C.J., 1994. Technology Strategy in East Asian Developing Countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 5(4), pp.541-572.10.1016/S1049-0078(10)80010-7Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg G. and Soete L., 1988. Technological Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Edquist, Ch., Zabala Iturriagagtia, J.M., 2018. Outputs of Innovation Systems: a European Perspective. Centre for Innovation, Research and competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University, [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228365493Outputs_of_innovation_systems_a_European_perspective [Accessed Jan 6, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

[11] Edquist, Ch., 2016. The Swedish National Council: Innovation Policy Governance to Replace Linearity with Holism. Papers in Innovation Studies, Paper No. 2016/24, CIRCLE, Lund University, Lund.Search in Google Scholar

[12] EIS, 2005 to 2018. European Innovation Scoreboard 2017 – Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Brussels: European Commission, European Trend Chart on Innovation.Search in Google Scholar

[13] EISa, 2018. European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Discussion Paper. Workshop on the European Innovation Scoreboard: Perspectives for 2020 and Beyond. November, European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

[14] EISb, 2018. European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Exploratory Report B: Toward the Incorporation of Big Data in the European Innovation Scoreboard, 19 June, European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

[15] EISc, 2018. European Innovation Scoreboard. Workshop on the European Innovation Scoreboard: Perspectives for 2020 and Beyond. Key Takeaways. November, Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

[16] EISd, 2018. European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Exploratory Report C: Supplementary Analyses and Contextualization of Innovation Performance Data. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. June, Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

[17] EU, 2014. Research and innovation: Pushing Boundaries and Improving the Quality of Life. Directorate-General for Communication. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Fagerberg, J., 1994. Technology and International Differences in Growth Rate. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(3), pp.183-200.10.1080/10438599500000002Search in Google Scholar

[19] FM (Frascati Manual), 2015. Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. In series: The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Freudenberg, M., 2003. Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment. STI Working paper, 2003/16, Industry Issues, OECD JT00153477.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gault, F., 2013. Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9780857933652Search in Google Scholar

[22] GCR, 2018. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-18, K. Schwab, ed. World Economic Forum, Geneva, [online] Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018 [Accessed February 10, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

[23] GII, 2018. Global Innovation Index 2018. Eds.: Soumitra, D., Bruno, L., Wunsch-Vincent, S., [online] Available at: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2018-repor [Accessed February 10, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

[24] Grupp, H., Schubert, T., 2010. Review and New Evidence on Composite Innovation Indicators for Evaluating National Performance. Research Policy, 39(1), pp.67-78.10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[25] Grupp, H., Mogee, M.E., 2004. Indicators for National Science and Technology Policy: How Robust are Composite Indicators? Research Policy, 33(9), pp.1373-1384.10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.007Search in Google Scholar

[26] Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, 2008. Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

[27] HDI, 2014. Human Development Index, 2014. United Nations Development Programme. New York: Published for the United Nations Development Program.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hollanders, H., Esser, F.C., 2007. Measuring innovation efficiency. ProInno Europe – InnoMetrics.Search in Google Scholar

[29] INNO, 2006. What is Innovation?, [online] Available at: http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/innodd.htm [Accessed March 6, 2017].Search in Google Scholar

[30] KAM, 2019. Knowledge Assessment Methodology and Knowledge Economy index: Knowledge for Development Program, The World Bank Institute, [online] Available at:https://estadisticas.pr/files/BibliotecaVirtual/estadisticas/biblioteca/BM/BM_KAM_2008.pdf [Accessed February 10, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

[31] Katz, S., 2006. Indicators for Complex Innovation Systems. Research Policy, 35(7), pp.893-909.10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kravchenko, N.A., 2011.The Problem of Measuring and Assessing National Innovation Systems. Problems of Economic Transition, 53(9), pp.61-73.10.2753/PET1061-1991530904Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lundvall, B., 2007. National Innovation Systems - Analytical Concept and Development Tool”. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), pp.95-119.10.1080/13662710601130863Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lundvall, B.A (ed), 2007. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publishers, London.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Metcalfe, S., 1995. The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives. In: P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US): Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Murillo-Zamorano, L.R., 2004. Economic Efficiency and Frontier Techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(1), pp.33-77.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.xSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Nasierowski, W., 2010. About Technical Efficiency of Efforts to Enhance Innovativeness in European Union. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 7(4), pp.389-404.10.1142/S0219877010002045Search in Google Scholar

[38] Nasierowski, W., 2009. A Conceptual Framework for Formalization of National Innovation Systems. Foundations of Management, 1(2), pp.159-166.10.2478/v10238-012-0017-8Search in Google Scholar

[39] Nasierowski, W., 2016. Composite Indexes of Economic and Social Performance: Do they Provide Valuable Information. Foundations of Management, 8(1), pp.167-174.10.1515/fman-2016-0013Search in Google Scholar

[40] Nasierowski, W. and Arcelus F., 2012. What is Innovativeness: Literature Review. Foundations of Management, 4(1), pp.63-74.10.2478/fman-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar

[41] Nasierowski, W. and Arcelus F., 2003. On the efficiency of National Innovation Systems. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 37, pp.215-234.10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00046-0Search in Google Scholar

[42] Nowak, S., 1965. Metody badań socjologicznych (Methods of Sociological Research). Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

[43] OECD, 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: JRC European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

[44] OECD, 2010. Measuring innovation: A new perspective. Paris: OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[45] OECD, 1997. National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[46] OECD, 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[47] OM (Oslo Manual), 2005. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3^rd edition Paris: OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. and Stilgoe, J., 2012. Responsible Research and Innovation: from Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), pp.751-760.10.1093/scipol/scs093Search in Google Scholar

[49] Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1994. The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems. STI Review, No. 14. Paris - OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Schibany, A., Streicher, G., 2008. The European Innovation Scoreboard: Drowning by Numbers? Science and Public Policy, 35(10), pp.717-732.10.3152/030234208X398512Search in Google Scholar

[51] Sharif, N., 2006. Emergence and Development of the National Innovation System Concept. Research Policy, 35, pp.745-766.10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[52] WCY, 2017. World Competitiveness Yearbook. Lausanne.Search in Google Scholar