[[1] ACOA - Fast Forward: An Innovation Guide forSmall and Medium Enterprises. ACOA, Fredericton.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Aho Report - Creating an Innovative Europe: Reportof the Independent Expert Group on R&Dand Innovation Appointed Following the HamptonCourt Summit, 2006, http://europa.eu.int/inwest-inresearch.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Amabile T.M. - Entrepreneurial CreativityThrough Motivational Synergy [in] Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 1997, pp. 18-26.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00778.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Archibugi D., Coco A. - Measuring TechnologicalCapabilities at the Country Level: a Survey anda Menu for Choices [in] Research Policy, 34, 2005, pp. 175-194.10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Arundel A., Hollanders H. - Policy IndicatorsAnd Targets: Measuring the Impact of InnovationPolicies. European Commission, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Arundel A., Hollanders H. - 2006 Trend ChartMethodology Report: Searching the Forestfor the Trees: “Missing” Indicators of Innovation. MERIT - Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Balzat M., Hanusch H. - Recent Trends in the Researchon National Innovation Systems [in] Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 2004, pp.197-210.10.1007/s00191-004-0187-y]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Betz F. - Managing Technology: Competingthrough New Ventures, Innovation, and CorporateResearch. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Blanke J., Fiona P. Sala-i-Martin X. - The GrowthCompetitiveness Index: Analyzing Key Underpinningsof Economic Growth. Global Competitiveness Report of the World Economic Forum, 2003 (Chap.1.1.).]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] CEDO - Emerging Regional Practices in Supportof SME Innovation. Montreal, Canada Economic Development Observatory, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Chapple W., Lockett A., Siegel D., Wright M. - Assessing the Relative Performance of U.K. UniversityTechnology Transfer Offices: Parametricand Non-Parametric Evidence [in] Research Policy, Vol. 34 (3), 2005, pp. 369-384.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Chen D.H.C., Dahlman C.J. - The KnowledgeEconomy, the KAM Methodology and World BankOperations. The World Bank, Washington DC 20433, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P., O'Donnell C.J., Battese G.E. - An Introduction to Efficiency and ProductivityAnalysis. Springer, New York 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. - Data EnvelopmentAnalysis and its Uses. Springer, New York 2006.10.1007/0-387-29122-9]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Dahlman C.J. - Technology Strategy in East AsianDeveloping Countries [in] Journal of Asian Economics, 5, 1994, pp. 541-572.10.1016/S1049-0078(10)80010-7]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Dernis H., Khan M. - Triadic Patent FamiliesMethodology. STI Working Paper 2004/2, OECD, Paris 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L. - Technological Change and Economictheory. Pinter Publishers, London 1988.]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Drucker P. - Innovation and Entrepreneurship:Practice and Principles. Harper & Row, New York 1985.]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Edquist C. - Systems of Innovation: Technologies,Institutions, and Organizations. Pinter, London 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] EIS - European Innovation Scoreboard 2005:Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance,European Trend Chart on Innovation, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Färe R., Grosskopf S. - Reference Guide to On-Front®. Economic Measurement and Quality I Lund AB, Lund 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Färe R., Grosskopf S. - User’s Guide to OnFront®. Economic Measurement and Quality I Lund AB, Lund 1998]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] FM - Frascati Manual: The Measurement of Scientificand Technological Activities. OECD, Paris 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Freeman C. - Technology and Economic Performance:Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Freeman C. - The National System of Innovationin Historical Perspective [in] Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, 1995, pp. 5-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Freudenberg M. - Composite Indicators of CountryPerformance: A Critical Assessment [in] STI Working paper 2003/16, Industry Issues, OECD JT00153477, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] GCR - The Growth Competitiveness Report. 2004-2005, 2005, Global Competitiveness Report of the World Economic Forum.]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] GII - Global Innovation Index 2009, www.management_today.co.uk/news/610009/ (accessed on 2009.03.16).]Search in Google Scholar
[[29] Griliches Z. - Patent Statistics as an Economic Indicator:A Survey [in] Journal of Economics Literature, 28 (4), 1990.10.3386/w3301]Search in Google Scholar
[[30] HDR - Human Development Report: InternationalComparison at a Crossroads: Aid, Trade And Securityin an Unequal World. Published for the United Nations Development Programme, New York 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[31] Hollanders H., Esser F.C. - Measuring InnovationEfficiency. ProInno Europe - InnoMetrics, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[[32] Hollanders H., van Cruysen A. - Rethinkingthe European Innovation Scoreboard: A NewMethodology for 2008-2010. ProInno Europe, Inno-Metrics, Maastricht 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[[33] INNO - What is Innovation?, 2006, http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/innodd.htm (accessed on 11.04.2007).]Search in Google Scholar
[[34] IUS - Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010, Inno- Metrics, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[[35] Jamison A., Hård M. - The Story-Lines of TechnologicalChange: Innovation, Construction and Appropriation [in] Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15, 200381-91.10.1080/0953732032000046060]Search in Google Scholar
[[36] KAM - The Knowledge Assessment Methodologyand Scorecards 2006, http://vle.worldbank.org/gdln/Programs/kam2001_methodology.htm (accessed on 24.08.2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[[37] Katz S. - Indicators for Complex Innovation Systems [in] Research Policy, 35 (7), 2006, pp. 893-909.10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[[38] Kedia B., Bhagat R.S. - Cultural Constraints onTransfer of Technology across Nations: Implicationsfor Research in International and ComparativeManagement [in] Academy of Management, 13, 1988, pp. 559-571.10.5465/amr.1988.4307424]Search in Google Scholar
[[39] Khan M., Dernis H. - Global Overview in InnovativeActivities from the Patent Indicators Perspective. STI Working Paper 2006/3, OECD, Paris 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[[40] Kline S.J., Rosenberg N. - An overview of Innovation. National Academy Press, Washington DC. 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[[41] Lisbon Strategy - Strategia Lizbońska: drogado sukcesu zjednoczonej Europy, Wyzwania członkowstwa. Urząd Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej, Ideapress, Gdansk 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[42] Lööf H., Heshmati A. - On the Relationship BetweenInnovation and Economic Performance [in] Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, 15, 2006, pp. 317-344.10.1080/10438590500512810]Search in Google Scholar
[[43] Lundvall B.A. - National Innovation Systems - AnalyticalConcept and Development Tool [in] Industry and Innovation 14 (1), 2007, pp. 95-119.10.1080/13662710601130863]Search in Google Scholar
[[44] Lundvall B.A. (ed) - National Systems of Innovation:Towards a Theory of Innovation and InteractiveLearning. Pinter Publishers, London 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[[45] McArthur J.W., Sachs J.D. - The Growth CompetitivenessIndex: Measuring Technological Advancementand the Stages of Development,in the Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2002. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Economic Forum 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[[46] Mirchandani D. - Economic and Social Indicatorsof Global Competitiveness: an Analysis of CountryRankings. 8th International Eastern Academy of Management Conference, (CD Rom version), Prague 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[[47] Nasierowski W. - Some Observations RegardingComposite Indexes of Economic Performance. North-East Decision Sciences Institute Conference, New York 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[[48] Nasierowski W. - Zarządzanie rozwojem techniki:Perspektywa krajowych systemów. Seria EuroManagement, Poltext, Warszawa 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[[49] Nasierowski W., Arcelus F. - On the Efficiencyof National Innovation Systems [in] Socio Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 215-234.10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00046-0]Search in Google Scholar
[[50] Nasierowski W., Arcelus F. - InterrelationshipsAmong the Elements of National Innovation Systems:A Statistical Evaluation [in] European Journal of Operations Research , Vol.119, 1999, pp.235-253.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00128-9]Search in Google Scholar
[[51] Nasierowski W. - About Technical Efficiency ofEfforts to Enhance Innovativeness in EuropeanUnion [in] International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 7, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 389-404.10.1142/S0219877010002045]Search in Google Scholar
[[52] Nasierowski W. - Composite Indexes and Indicatorsof Innovativeness: Some Critical Comments [in] Global Management Journal, Vol. 2, No 1, 2010, pp. 40-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[[53] Nasierowski W. - A Conceptual Framework forFormalization of National Innovation Systems [in] Foundations of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009, pp. 159-166.10.2478/v10238-012-0017-8]Search in Google Scholar
[[54] Nasierowski W. - Zarządzanie rozwojem techniki:Perspektywa krajowych systemów. Seria EuroManagement, PolText, 1998 Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[[55] Nelson R. (ed.) - National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[[56] OM, Oslo Manual - OECD Proposed Guidelinesfor Collecting and Interpreting Technological InnovationData. OECD/EuroStat, Paris (KBN 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[[57] Porter M. - Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York 1990.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1]Search in Google Scholar
[[58] Rodriguez-Pose A. - Is R&D Investment in LaggingAreas of Europe Worthwhile? Theory andEmpirical Evidence. Regional Science, 2001, pp. 275-295.10.1007/PL00013631]Search in Google Scholar
[[59] Rogers M. - The Definition and Measurementof Innovation. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[[60] Rutten R., Boekema F. - Innovation, Policyand Economic Growth: Theory and Cases [in] European Planning Studies, Vol. 13, issue 8, 2005, pp. 1131-1136.10.1080/09654310500336436]Search in Google Scholar
[[61] Saisana M., Tarantola S. - State-of-the-Art Reporton Current Methodologies and Practices for CompositeIndicator Development. Joint Research Centre - European Commission, I-21020 Ispra (VA), Italy 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[62] Sajeva M., Gatelli D., Tarantola S., Hollanders H. - Methodology Report on the European InnovationScoreboard 2005. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[63] Sarasvathy S.D. - Causation and Effectuation: Towarda Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitabilityto Entrepreneurial Contingency [in] Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 20012, pp. 43-288.10.2307/259121]Search in Google Scholar
[[64] Schwartzman S., de Souza A. - Evaluation And EfficiencyOf Research And Experimental Development(R&D) Institutions And Units, http://www.schwartzman.org.br/simon/rd_inst.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[[65] Schibany A., Streicher G. - How not to CompareInnovation Performance: A Critical Assessment ofthe European Innovation Scoreboard. Joanneum Research Institute of Technology and Regional Policy, Vienna 2008.10.3152/030234208X398512]Search in Google Scholar
[[66] Schumpeter J.A. - Economic Theory and EntrepreneurialHistory [in] Change and the Entrepreneur: Postulates and Patterns for Entrepreneurial History (ed. A.H. Cole). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1949, pp. 63-84.]Search in Google Scholar
[[67] Seng Tan B. - The Consequences of Innovation [in] The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 9 (3), 2004, pp. 1-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[[68] Shariff N. - Emergence and development of the NationalInnovation System concept [in] Research Policy, Vol. 35, 2006, pp.745-766.10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[[69] TEP - Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationships. The Technology/ Economy Programme, OECD, Paris1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[[70] Välimäki H., Niskanen A., Tervonen K., Laurula I. - Indicators of Innovativeness and EnterpriseCompetitiveness in the Woods Products Industryin Finland [in] Scandinavian Journal of Forestry Research, 19 (Supplement 5), 2004, pp. 90-96.10.1080/02827580410017898]Search in Google Scholar
[[71] Varian H. - Intermediate Microeconomics: A ModernApproach. New York: Norton 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[72] WCY, World Competitiveness Yearbook. IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[[73] Wei Q., Yan H. - Congestion and Returns to Scalein Data Envelopment Analysis [in] European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 2004, pp. 641-660.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00799-3]Search in Google Scholar
