[ABCA, 2012. GM carnations in Australia: a resource guide. http://www.abca.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ABCA_Resource_Guide_2_v2.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ACBIO, 2013. GM industry called to account: ISAAA’s report mischievous and erroneous. African Centre for Biosafety. https://acbio.org.za/gm-industry-called-to-account-isaaas-report-mischievous-and-erroneous. Accessed 1 October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[AFCD, 2015. Review of the exemption of genetically modified papayas in Hong Kong. Discussion Paper GMO 04/2015. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong. https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_gmo/gmo_exp/files/Discussion_Paper_GMO_04_2015.pdf.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[AFCD, 2017. Report on the Survey of Genetically Modified Organisms in Hong Kong. Discussion Paper GMO 02/2017. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong. https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_gmo/gmo_exp/files/Discussion_Paper_GMO_04_2015.pdf.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alonso-Prados J.L., Fraile A., Garcia-Arenal F., 1997. Impact of Cucumber mosaic virus and Watermelon mosaic virus-2 infection on melon production in central Spain. J. Plant Pathol. 79(2), 131-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[AP, 2016. Hawaii counties can’t regulate GMOs and pesticides according to new ruling. The Associated Press November. 19 2016. http://fortune.com/2016/11/19/hawaii-gmo-pesticide-regulation. Accessed 1 October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1992a. Petition for determination: Flavr Savr™ Tomato as non-regulated under CFR340 1992. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/92_19601p.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1992b. Response to Calgene petition for determination of regulatory status. USDA A PH IS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/92_19601p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1992c. Petition for determination regulatory status of Cucurbita pepo L. cultivar YC77E ZW-20. USDA APHIS Petition No. 92-204-01p. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/92_20401p.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1994a. Petition for release from regulation for modified lines B, Da, F derived from T7 varieties of processing tomato. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/94_29001p.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1994b. Addition of one genetically engineered tomato line to determination of non-regulated status for Calgene, Inc. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/94_22701p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1994c. Determination of nonregulated status for additional Calgene, Inc., genetically engineered FLAVR SAVR™ tomato lines. USDA APHIS Docket No. 94-125-1. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/94_23001p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1994d. Petition for determination of nonregulated status: delayed-ripening tomato line 1345-4. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/94_22801p.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995a. Petition for determination of nonregulated status for additional Calgene, Inc., genetically engineered FLAVR SAVR™ tomato lines. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/95_03001p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995b. Addition of two genetically engineered tomato lines to determination of nonregulated status for Calgene, Inc. USDA APHIS Docket No. 95-068-1. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/95_17901p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995c. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for genetically engineered tomato lines. USDA APHIS Docket No. 95-016-2. Federal Register 60(121), 32650. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/94_29001p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995d. Petition for determination of nonregulated status: cherry tomatoes with S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase gene. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/95_32401p.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995e. Petition for determination of nonregulated status: tomatoes with delayed ripening gene. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/95_05301p.pdf 8338. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995f. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for genetically engineered tomato line of Monsanto company. USDA APHIS Docket No. 95-042-1. Federal Register 60(195), 52642. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1995-10-10/pdf/FR-1995-10-10.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995g. Response to DNA Plant Technology Corporation petition for determination of nonregulated status for tomato line 1345-4. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/94_22801p_com.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995h. Petition for determination of nonregulated status: squash containing the coat protein genes from Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV), Watermelon Mosaic Virus 2 (WMV 2), and Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus (ZYMV). USDA APHIS Petition No. 95-352-01p. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/95_35201p.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1995i. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for virus resistant squash. USDA APHIS Docket No. 92-127-4. Federal Register 59(238), 64187. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/92_20401p_com.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1996a. Calgene, Inc. Addition of one genetically engineered tomato line to determination of nonregulated status. USDA APHIS Docket No. 96-080-1. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/96_24801p_com.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1996b. Agritope, Inc. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for cherry tomato line genetically engineered for modified fruit ripening. USDA APHIS Docket No. 95-097-2. Federal Register 61(70), 15919. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/95_32401p_com.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1996c. Asgrow Seed Co. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for squash line genetically engineered for virus resistance. USDA APHIS Docket No. 96-002-2. Federal Register 61(125), 33484. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/95_35201p_com.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1996d. Petition for determination of regulatory status: transgenic papaya lines 55-1 and 63-1 and their derivatives. USDA APHIS Docket No. 96-024-1, Petition No. 96-051-01p. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/96_05101p.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1996e. Corenell University and University of Hawaii; Availability of determination of nonregulated status for papaya lines genetically engineered for virus resistance. USDA APHIS Docket No. 96-024-2. Federal Register 61(180), 48663. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/96_05101p_com.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1997a. Petition for determination of non-regulated status for insect resistant tomato line 5345. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/97_28701p.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1997b. Monsanto Co. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for tomato genetically engineered for insect resistance. USDA APHIS Docket No. 97-114-2. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/97_28701p_com.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1997c. Petition for determination of nonregulated status for radicchio rosso lines with male sterility (SEED LINK™). USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/97_14801p.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1997d. Bejo Zaden BV. Availability of determination of nonregulated status for genetically engineered radicchio rosso. USDA APHIS Docket No. 97-067-2. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/97_14801p_com.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 1999. Agritope, Inc. Availability of environmental assessment for determination of nonregulated status. USDA APHIS Docket No. 99-003-2. Federal Register 64(206), 57625. http://en.biosafetyscanner.org/pdf/eventi/148_59700d5e6efd9b2f8c06fa4f63568f8f.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2007a. Approval of USDA-ARS request (04-264-01P) seeking a determination of non-regulated status for C5 plum resistant to Plum Pox Virus. Finding of no significant impact and decision notice. USDA APHIS Combined documents. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/04_26401p_com.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2007b. University of Florida. Determination of nonregulated status for plum genetically engineered for resistance to Plum pox virus. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054. Federal Register 72(134), 38556. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20090901.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2008. Petition for nonregulated status for the X17-2 line of papaya: a Papaya ringspot virus – resistant papaya. USDA APHIS. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2009a. Finding of no significant impact. Petition for nonregulated status for University of Florida X17-2 papaya. USDA APHIS. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/04_33701p_com.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2009b. University of Florida. Determination of nonregulated status for papaya genetically engineered for resistance to the Papaya ringspot virus. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054. Federal Register 74(168), 45163. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20090901.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2011a. Determination of nonregulated status for altered color roses. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS–2010–0040. Federal Register 76(189), 60447. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20110929a.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2011b. Petition (08-315-01p) for a determination of nonregulated status for Rosa x hybrida varieties IFD-524Ø1-4 and IFD-529Ø1-9 - ADDENDUM 1. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/08_31501p.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2012. Petition for determination of nonregulated status: ArcticTM apple (Malus x domestica) events GD743 and GS784. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2012-0025, petition No. 10-161-01p. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/10_16101p.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2014. Determination of nonregulated status for Okanagan Specialty Fruits’ GD743 and GS784 apples. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2012-0025. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/10_16101p_det.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2015. Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc; Determination of nonregulated status of apples genetically engineered to resist browning. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2012-0025. Federal Register 80(32), 8589. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=APHIS-2012-0025-6945. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2016a. National environmental policy act decision and finding of no significant impact: Request for extension of determination of non-regulated status for non-browning Arctic® Fuji apple (16-004-01p). USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2016-0043. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/16_00401p_fonsi.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2016b. Response letter to the request for confirmation that transgene-free, CRISPR-edited mushroom is not a regulated article. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/15-321-01_air_response_signed.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2017a. BRS list of varieties requiring import authorization. Updated 3 October 2017. USDA APHIS. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/petunia_varieties.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2017b. Proposed rule. Importation, interstate movement, and environmental release of certain genetically engineered organisms. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS–2015–0057. Federal Register, 2017. 82(214), 7008. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20171107.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[APHIS, 2017c. Proposed rule; withdrawal. Importation, interstate movement, and environmental release of certain genetically engineered organisms. USDA APHIS Docket No. APHIS–2015–0057. Federal Register, 2017. 82(12),51582. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20170119.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aragao F.J.L., Faria J.C., 2009. First transgenic geminivirus-resistant plant in the field. Nat. Biotechnol. 27(12), 1086-1088.10.1038/nbt1209-1086]Search in Google Scholar
[Aragao F.J.L., Nogueira E.O.P.L., Tinoco M.L.P., Faria J.C., 2013. Molecular characterization of the first commercial transgenic common bean immune to the Bean golden mosaic virus. J. Biotechnol. 166(1-2), 42-50.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.04.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong J., Lane W.D., 2011. Genetically modified reduced-browning fruit-producing plant and produced fruit thereof, and method of obtaining such. US patent 8,563,805, application by Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc., filled 26.02.2009, published 6.01.2011. https://www.lens.org/lens/patent/US_8563805_B2. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakum J., 2015. Director of General of BARI remarks about BT brinjal. https://bteggplant.cornell.edu/content/blog/blog-tags/1. Accessed 8 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bashandy H., Teeri T. H., 2017. Genetically engineered orange petunias on the market. Planta 246(2), 277-280.10.1007/s00425-017-2722-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Basso M.F., Lima J.A.A., Deguchi M., Galdeano D.M., Fernandes P.M.B., 2016. Papaya viral diseases: recent advances and perspectives. In: Urbano K.V. (ed.), Advances in Genetics Research 16, 135-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2012a. Modified organism CGN-89564-2 – FLAVR SAVR™ tomato. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=14867. Accessed 1 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2012b. Modified organism cantaloupe A (delayed ripening). Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=15388. Accessed 10 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2012c. Modified organism Huafan No 1. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp?EventID=186. Accessed 2 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2012d. Modified organism Da Dong No 9. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp?EventID=187. Accessed 2 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2012e. Modified organism PK-TM8805R (8805R). Biosafety Clearing-House. http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp?EventID=188. Accessed 2 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2013a. Modified organism SYN0000B-6 – Tomato modified for delayed softening, Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=15405. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2013b. Modified organism SYN-000DA-9 – Tomato modified for delayed softening. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=15406. Accessed 2 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2013c. Modified organism SYN-0000F-1 – Tomato modified for delayed softening. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=15407. Accessed 2 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2014a. Modified organism tomato modified for delayed ripening 35-1-N. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=15419. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2014b. Modified organism tomato modified for delayed ripening 1345-4. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=15395. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2014c. CGN-89322-3 – Delayed-ripening tomato. Biosafety Clearing-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=14781. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2014d. Notification of a transboundary movement of an LMO carried out in contravention of domestic measures to implement the Protocol (Article 25.3). Biosafety Clearing-House Japan country communication. http://bch.cbd.int/database/attachment/?id=14684. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2018a. Convention on Biological Diversity. Country's decision or any other communication. Biosafety Cleaning-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=111644. Accessed 17 May 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[BCH, 2018b. Convention on Biological Diversity. Risk assessment. Biosafety Cleaning-House. http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=111643. Accessed 17 May 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bedbrook J.R., Howie W.J., Dunsmuir P., Lee K.Y., Joe L.K., 1997. Delayed ripening tomato plants. International Patent WO/1997/001952, application by DNA Plant Technology Corp., filled 28.06.1996, published 23.01.1997. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO1997001952. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biology discussion, 2016. Bt-brinjal: Production and its development; India. http://www.biologydiscussion.com/vegetable-breeding/bt-brinjal-production-andits-development-india/68749. Accessed 4 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BiosafetyScanner, 2018. Scheda evento 8805R e metodi di analisi. Fondazione Diritti Genetici. http://www.biosafetyscanner.org/schedaevento.php?radioeventi=radiobutton&evento=242&evento1=#tabs-1a. Accessed 2 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bommineni V.R., Mathews H., Clendennen S.K., Wagoner W., Dewey V., Kellogg J., et al., 2000. Genetic engineering of fruits and vegetables with the ethylene control gene encoding S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase (SAMase) In: Plant Genetic Engineering: Towards the Third Millennium. A.D. Arenciba (ed.), Elsevier Science BV, 206-214.10.1016/S0168-7972(00)80033-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonfim K., Faria J.C., Nogueira E.O.P.L., Mendes E.A., Aragao F.J.L., 2007. RNAi-mediated resistance to Bean golden mosaic virus in genetically engineered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20(6), 717-726.10.1094/MPMI-20-6-071717555279]Search in Google Scholar
[Brady C., MacAlpine G., McGlasson W.B., Ueda Y., 1982. Polygalacturonase in tomato fruit and the induction of ripening. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9, 171-178.10.1071/PP9820171]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruening G, Lyons J., 2000. The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. California Agriculture 54(4), 6-7.10.3733/ca.v054n04p6]Search in Google Scholar
[Brugliera F., Ta, G.Q., Tems U., Kalc G., Mouradova E., Price K., et al., 2013. Violet/blue chrysanthemums – metabolic engineering of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway results in novel petal colors. Plant Cell Physiol. 54(10), 1696-1710.10.1093/pcp/pct11023926066]Search in Google Scholar
[Cambra M., Capote N., Myrta A., Lla´cer G., 2006. Plum pox virus and the estimated costs associated with sharka disease. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 36(2), 202-204. 4210.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.01027.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Carillo C.A., 2017. GM eggplant completes latest field trials. http://bworldonline.com/gm-eggplant-completes-latest-field-trials/. Accessed 8 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[CERA, 1998. UK Competent Authority: Initial assessment report. Application number 98/UK/1. Report on the safety assessment of processed products from Zeneca’s genetically modified (GM) tomatoes derived from line TGT7F. http://cera-gmc.org/docs/decdocs/tgt7f_acnfp.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[CFIA, 2015. Decision document DD2015-110: Determination of the Safety of Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc.'s apple (Malus domestica Borkh) events GD743 and GS784. CFIA. http://inspection.gc.ca/plants/plants-with-novel-traits/approved-under-review/decision-documents/dd2015-110/eng/1498237204300/1498237333410. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen Z., Yang R., 1996. Method for cultivating tomato with function of anti virus of mosaic of cucumber by gene engineering. China patent CN 1054160, application by Beijing University, filled 4.07.1995, published 7.02.1996. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN82309046&redirectedID=true. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Choudhary B., Gaur K., 2009. The development and regulation of Bt brinjal in India (Eggplant/Aubergine). ISAAA Brief No.38. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[COFEPRIS, 2018. Lista de evaluacion de inocuidad caso por caso de los organismos geneticamente modificados (OGMs). http://www.cofepris.gob.mx/AZ/Paginas/OGMS/Lista.aspx. Accessed 12 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[COGEM, 2007. Advices import of genetically modified carnation ‘Moonaqua’. CGM/070206-02. https://www.cogem.net/showdownload.cfm?objectId=FFFE71E7-1517-64D9-CC1798C061035456&objectType=mark.apps.cogem.contentobjects.publication.download.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[COGEM, 2017. Unauthorised GM garden petunia varieties with orange flowers. COGEM advice CGM/170522-04. https://www.cogem.net/showdownload.cfm?objectId=3E808913-D0A9-773D-9CBDA6C4C03308B4&objectType=mark.hive.contentobjects.download.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[CTNBio, 2011. Commercial release of genetically modif ied beans. 3024/2011. http://ctnbio.mcti.gov.br/documents/566529/686051/Technical+Opinion+No.+3024-2011+-+Commercial+Release+of+genetically+modified+bean+resistant+to+Bean+Golden+Mosaic+Virus+-Bean+golden+mosaic+virus+-+BGMV-+event+Embrapa+5.1+-+Case+No.+01200.005161-2010-86/30b55a23-ed57-4e13-8232-bd59571252cc;jsessionid=17C34F55F92DF00F2D7CABD3A9D9E7BF.rima?version=1.0. Accessed 18 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahmani-Mardas F., Troadec C., Boualem A., Lévêque S., Alsadon A.A., Aldoss A.A., Bendahmane A., 2010. Engineering melon plants with improved fruit shelf life using the TILLING approach. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e15776.10.1371/journal.pone.0015776301270321209891]Search in Google Scholar
[Dai S., Zheng P., Marmey P., Zhang S., Tian W., Chen S., et al., 2001. Comparative analysis of transgenic rice plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and particle bombardment. Mol. Breed. 7(1), 25-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dale J., James A., Paul J.-Y., Khanna H., Smith M., Peraza-Echeverria S., et al., 2017. Transgenic Cavendish bananas with resistance to Fusarium wilt tropical race 4. Nature Commun. 8(1), 1496.10.1038/s41467-017-01670-6568440429133817]Search in Google Scholar
[Dellanay X., LaVallee B.J., Proksch R.K., Fuchs R.L., Sims S.R., Greenplate J.T., et al., 1989. Field performance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki insect control protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 7, 1265-1269.10.1038/nbt1289-1265]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 1996. 96/424/EC: Commission Decision of 20 May 1996 concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified male sterile chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) with partial tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate ammonium pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31996D0424. Accessed 8 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 1999. Opinion on a request for consent to place on the market a tomato fruit genetically modified to down-regulate the production of polygalacturonase (PG), and solely intended for processing. SCF/CS.NF/TOM/6 REV 4 final. https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/sci-com_scf_out42_en.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 2007. 2007/364/EC, Commission decision of 23 May 2007 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line 123.2.38) genetically modified for flower colour. Document C(2007)2120. Official Journal of the European Union L 138, 50-52. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:138:0050:0052:EN:PDF. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 2009. 2009/244/EC, Commission decision of 16 March 2009 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line 123.8.12) genetically modified for flower colour. Document C(2009)1673. Official Journal of the European Union L 72, 18-20. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009D0244&rid=1. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 2015a. 2015/692, Commission implementing decision (EU) 2015/692 of 24 April 2015 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line 25958) genetically modified for flower colour. Document C(2015)2765. Official Journal of the European Union L 112:44-47. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015D0692&from=EN. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 2015b. 2015/694, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/694 of 24 April 2015 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line 26407) genetically modified for flower colour. Document C(2015)2768. Official Journal of the European Union L 112:52-55. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015D0694&from=EN. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC, 2016. 2016/2050, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2050 of 22 November 2016 as regards the placing on the market of a genetically modified carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line SHD-27531-4). Document C(2016)7443. Official Journal of the European Union L 318:13-16. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016D2050&from=EN. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elderidge S., 2003 Food biotechnology: Current issues and perspectives. Nova Science USA, 11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Embrapa, 2016. Bean cultivar BRS FC 401 RMD resistant to the Golden mosaic virus official statement. https://www.embrapa.br/en/esclarecimentos-oficiais/-/asset_publisher/TMQZKu1jxu5K/content/tema-cultivar-defeijao-resistente-ao-mosaico-dourado-brs-fc401-rmd. Accessed 15 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[EPA, 2010. Coat protein gene of Plum pox virus. Biopesticides registration action document, PC Code: 006354. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/decision_PC-006354_7-May-10.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[EPA, 2014. Notice of pesticide registration C5 HoneySweet Plum No. 11312-8. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/011312-00008-20140930.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[EPA, 2016. Notice of pesticide registration X17-2 Papaya No. 84427-1. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/084427-00001-20160112.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Court, 2018. Advocate General’s Opinion of 18 January 2018, Request for a preliminary ruling from the Council of State, France (C-528/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:20).]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans E.A., Ballen F.H., Crane J.H., 2015. An overview of US papaya production, trade, and consumption. University of Florida IFAS Extension, FE914. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe914. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1992. Statement of policy – Foods derived from new plant varieties. Federal Register 57. Guidance to industry for food derived from new plant varieties. https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm. Accessed 3 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1994. Agency Response Letter Re: FMF 526 and Docket No. 91A-0330. CFSAN/Office of Premarket Approval. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20180124124721/https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GEPlants/Submissions/ucm225027.htm. Accessed 3 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1995a. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000003. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095124/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095124. Accessed 15 March 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1995b. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No.000002. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095145/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095145. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1995c. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000007. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095507/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095507. Accessed 6 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1995d. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000006. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095519/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095519. Accessed 17 March 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1996. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000014. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095102/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031095102. Accessed 15 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1997a. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF 000043. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031093739/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031093739. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1997b. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000045. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031093828/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031093828. Accessed 8 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1997c. Biotechnology Consultation Note to the File BNF No. 000042. FDA. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031094445/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031094445. Accessed 26 March. Accessed on 26 Mar 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1998. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000054. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031093146/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031093146. Accessed 7 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1999a. Biotechnology Consultation Note to the File BNF No. 000060. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031091240/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031091240. Accessed 8 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 1999b. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000060. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031091310/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031091310Accessed 8 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 2008. Biotechnology Consultation Note to the File BNF No. 000100. FDA. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031090057/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031090057. Accessed 26 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 2009. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter CFSAN/Office of Food Additive Safety. FDA, BNF No. 000101. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031090404/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031090404. Accessed 26 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 2015. Biotechnology Consultation Note to the File BNF No. 000132. FDA. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031091552/https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171031091552. Accessed 26 March. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[FDA, 2016. Biotechnology Consultation Agency Response Letter BNF No. 000149. FDA. https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GEPlants/Submissions/ucm533372.htm. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferreira S.A., Pitz K.Y., Manshardt R., Zee F., Fitch M., Gonsalves, D., 2002. Virus coat protein transgenic papaya provides practical control of Papaya ringspot virus in Hawaii. Plant Dis. 86(2), 101-105.10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.2.10130823304]Search in Google Scholar
[FFP, 2017. U.S.: Arctic Apple set for commercial launch following successful trials. FreshFruitPortal.com, 22 May 2017. https://www.freshfruitportal.com/news/2017/05/22/u-s-arctic-apple-set-commercial-launch-following-successful-trials. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fichtner F., Castellanos R., Ulker B., 2014. Precision genetic modifications: a new era in molecular biology and crop improvement. Planta 239(4), 921-939.10.1007/s00425-014-2029-y24510124]Search in Google Scholar
[Firoozbady E., Young Th.R., 2015. Pineapple plant named ‘rosé’. US plant patent PP25,763 P3, application by Del Monte Fresh Produce, filled 4.06.2012, published 4.08.2015. https://www.lens.org/lens/patent/197-779-624-196-993. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischoff D.A., Bowdish K.S., Perlak F.J., Marrone P.G., McCornick S.M., Niedermeyer J.G., et al., 1987 Insect tolerant transgenic tomato plants. Biotechnol. 5, 807-813.10.1038/nbt0887-807]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitch M.M.M., Manshardt R.M., Gonsalves D., Slightom J.L., Sanford J.C., 1992. Virus resistant papaya derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of Papaya ringspot virus. BioTechnol. 10, 1466-1472.10.1038/nbt1192-1466]Search in Google Scholar
[GAIN, 2011. Japan approved GM papaya. GAIN Rep. No. JA1048. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Japan%20approved%20GM%20papaya_Tokyo_Japan_12-19-2011.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[GAIN, 2014. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual. China. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. GAIN Rep. No. 14032. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Beijing_China%20-%20Peoples%20Republic%20of_12-31-2014.pdf. Accessed 5 October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[GAIN, 2016a. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual. Bangladesh. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. GAIN Rep. No. BG6010. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/RecentGAINPublications/Agricultural Biotechnology Annual_Dhaka_Bangladesh_11-21-2016.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[GAIN, 2016b. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual. Colombia remains open to new technologies. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. GAIN Rep. 11/17/2016. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/RecentGAINPublications/Agricultural Biotechnology Annual_Bogota_Colombia_11-17-2016.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[GAIN, 2016c. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual. Costa Rica, Ministry of agriculture supported biotech moratorium. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. GAIN Rep. 12/20/2016. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_San%20Jose_Costa%20Rica_12-20-2016.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[GAIN, 2016d. Agricultural biotechnology annual: Japan. GAIN Rep. No. JA6050. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/AGRICULTURAL%20BIOTECHNOLOGY%20ANNUAL_Tokyo_Japan_11-30-2016.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gocal, G., 2015. Non-transgenic trait development in crop plants using oligo-directed mutagenesis: Cibus’ Rapid Trait Development System. In: NABC Report 26. New DNA-Editing Approaches: Methods, Applications and Policy for Agriculture. North American Agricultural Biotechnology Council, Ithaca, NY, 97-105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonnet J-F, Fenet B., 2000. ‘Cyclamen red’ color based on a macrocyclic anthocyanin in carnation flowers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48(1), 22-25.10.1021/jf990764210637045]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonsalves D., 2004. Transgenic papaya in Hawaii and beyond. AgBioForum 71, 36-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonsalves D., Gonsalves C., Ferreira S., Pitz K., Fitch M., Manshardt R., Slightom J., 2004. Transgenic virus-resistant papaya: from hope to reality in controlling Papaya ringspot virus in Hawaii. APSnet Features. http://www.apsnet.org/publications/apsnetfeatures/Pages/PapayaRingspot.aspx. Accessed 30 September 2017.10.1094/APSnetFeature-2004-0704]Search in Google Scholar
[Green J.M., 2009. Evolution of glyphosate-resistant crop technology. Weed Sci. 57(1), 108-117.10.1614/WS-08-030.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Griesbach R.J., 1993. Characterization of the flavonoids from Petunia× hybrida flowers expressing the A1 gene of Zea mays. HortScience, 28(6), 659-660.10.21273/HORTSCI.28.6.659]Search in Google Scholar
[Griesbach R.J., 2007. Petunia. In: Flower Breeding and Genetics. N.O. Anderson (ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, 301-336.10.1007/978-1-4020-4428-1_11]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 1995a. Suppressed polygalacturonase activity Flavr Savr™ tomato. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/suppressed-polygalacturonase-activity-flavr-savr-tomato.html. Accessed 2 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 1995b. Delayed ripening tomato line 1345-4. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/delayed-ripening-tomato-line-1345-4.html. Accessed 5 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 1996. Suppressed polygalacturonase activity tomato hybrids, 1401F, H282F, 11013F, 7913F. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/suppressed-polygalacturonase-activity-tomato-hybrids-1401fh282f-11013f-7913f.html. Accessed 30 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 1998a. Virus resistant squash line ZW-20. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/virus-resistant-squash-line-20.html. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 1998b. Virus resistant squash line CZW-3. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/virus-resistant-squash-line-czw-3.html. Accessed 17 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 2000. Insect (lepidopteran species) resistant tomato 5345. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/insect-lepidopteran-species-resistant-tomato-line-5345.html. Accessed 7 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 2003. Novel food information – Food biotechnology. Human food use of virus resistant papaya line 55-1. Health Canada. http://cera-gmc.org/files/cera/GmCropDatabase/docs/decdocs/03-065-001.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 2013. Determination of the safety of Cibus Canada Inc.'s canola (Brassica napus L.) event 5715. DD 2013-100. Health Canada. http://inspection.gc.ca/plants/plants-with-novel-traits/approved-under-review/decision-documents/dd-2013-100/eng/1427383332253/1427383674669. Accessed 5 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 2015. Novel food information – Arctic apple events GD743 and GS784. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/novel-food-information-arctic-apple-events-gd743-gs784.html. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[HC, 2018. Novel food information – Arctic apple event NF872. Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/arctic-fuji-apple/information.html. Accessed 5 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hobson G.E., 1965. The firmness of tomato fruit in relation to polygalacturonase activity. J. Hort. Sci. 40, 66-72.10.1080/00221589.1965.11514121]Search in Google Scholar
[Holton T.A., 1996. Transgenic plants exhibiting altered flower color and methods for producing same. International Patent WO/1996/036716, applied by International Flower Developments Pty. Ltd., filled 16.05.1996, published 21.11.1996. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO1996036716. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[IATP, 2001. GM food crops and application of substantial equivalence in the European Union. https://www.iatp.org/files/GM_Food_Crops_and_Application_of_Substantial_E.htm. Accessed 7 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICA, 2000. Por la cual se autoriza la introducción de plantas de clavel modificado genéticamente. Resolucion No. 1219 (18 MAY 2000). http://bch.cbd.int/database/attachment/?id=14170. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICA, 2008. Por la cual se autoriza la importación del material reproductivo de claveles modificados por las técnicas de ingeniería genética para producción de flor cortada para exportación. Resolucion No. 3932 (20 NOVEMBER 2008). https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/978557f9-da42-4f80-85f6-947b27f67a25/2008R3932.aspx. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICA, 2009. Resolución 3786: Por la cual se autoriza adelantar siembra experimental en invernadero de Rosas Modificadas. Genéticamente para el color de la flor mediante el Vector binario pSPB130 para produccion de flor cortada para exportacion. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/37101b43-3129-4008-b448-2bda8e762027/3857.aspx. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICA, 2012. Resolución 3570: Por la cual se autoriza la importación del material reproductivo de Crisantemo de flor azul, modificados con los vectores de Transformación pCGP3618, pCGP3633 y pCGP3641, para producción de flor cortada para exportación. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/37101b43-3129-4008-b448-2bda8e762027/3857.aspx. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ILSI, 2011. A review of the environmental safety of the Cry1Ac protein. International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation. Environ. Biosafety Res. 10, 27-49.10.1051/ebr/2012002]Search in Google Scholar
[ISAAA, 2009. Pocket K No. 35: Bt brinjal in India. http://isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/35/default.asp. Accessed 4 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISAAA, 2015. Brief 51: Executive Summary. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/51/executivesummary/default.asp. Accessed 4 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISAAA, 2016a. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief 52, ISAAA, Ithaca, New York, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISAAA, 2016b. Pocket K. No. 48: Bt eggplant. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/48/default.asp. Accessed 4 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISAAA, 2017. ISAAA donor support group. http://www.isaaa.org/inbrief/donors/default.asp. Accessed 4 October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[James C., 2014. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief 49, ISAAA, Ithaca, New York, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2004a. Purple-violet carnation 123.8.8 (F3'5'H, DFR, Dianthus caryophyllus L.) (OECD UI: FLO-40685-1). Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/FLO40685enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2004b. Purple-violet carnation 123.2.38 (F3'5'H, DFR, Dianthus caryophyllus L.) (OECD UI: FLO-40644-4) Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/FLO40644enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2004c. Purple-violet carnation 11363 (F3'5'H, DFR, Dianthus caryophyllus L.) (OECD UI: FLO-11363-1). Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/FLO11363enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2004d. Purple-violet carnation 11 (F3'5'H, DFR, Dianthus caryophyllus L.) (OECD UI: FLO-07442-4). Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/FLO07442enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2008a. Rose Variety with modified flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (F3'5'H, 5AT, Rosa hybrida) (WKS82/130-4-1, ECD UI: IFD-52401-4). Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/130_4_1_2008enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2008b. Rose Variety with modified flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (F3'5'H, 5AT, Rosa hybrida) (WKS82/130-9-1, OECD UI: IFD-52901-9). Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/130_9_1_2008enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JCH, 2009. Purple-violet carnation (F3′5′H, DFR, sur B, Dianthus caryophyllus L.) (123.8.12, OECD UI: FLO-40689-6). Japan Clearing House. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/download/en_lmo/FLO40689enRi.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[JRC EU, 2007. Report on the testing of a PCR-based detection method for identification of Florigene™ Moonlite GM carnation. Protocol Version 2. http://gmoinfo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/docs/C-NL-04-02%20CRL%20method.pdf. Accessed on 24 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kato K., Yoshida R., Kikuzaki A., Hirai T., Kuroda H., Hiwasa-Tanase K., et al., 2010. Molecular breeding of tomato lines for mass production of miraculin in a plant factory. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 9505-9510.10.1021/jf101874b20695489]Search in Google Scholar
[Katsumoto Y., Fukuchi-Mizutani M., Fukui Y., Brugliera F., Holton T.A., Karan M., et al., 2007. Engineering of the rose flavonoid biosynthetic pathway successfully generated blue-hued flowers accumulating delphinidin. Plant Cell Physiol. 48(11), 1589-1600.10.1093/pcp/pcm13117925311]Search in Google Scholar
[Keeler S.J., Sanders P., Smith J.K., Mazur B.J., 1993. Regulation of tobacco acetolactate synthase gene expression. Plant Physiol. 102(3), 1009-1018.10.1104/pp.102.3.10091588758278521]Search in Google Scholar
[Kitagawa M., Nakamura K., Kondo K., Ubukata S., Akiyama H., 2014. Examination of processed vegetable foods for the presence of common DNA sequences of genetically modified tomatoes. J. Food Hyg. Saf. Sci. 55(5), 247-253.10.3358/shokueishi.55.24725743587]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyodo, 2011. Suntory to sell blue roses overseas. The Japan Times 16 September 2011. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2011/09/16/news/suntory-to-sell-blue-roses-overseas. Accessed 22 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lisa V., Lecoq H., 1984. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. CMI/AAB Descriptions of plant viruses, no. 282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lu C., Chandler S.F., Mason J.G., Brugliera F., 2003. Florigene flowers: from laboratory to market. In: Plant Biotechnology 2002 and Beyond. I.K. Vasil (ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, 333-336.10.1007/978-94-017-2679-5_69]Search in Google Scholar
[Luis-Arteaga M., Alvarez J.M., Alonso-Prados J.L., Bernal J.J., García-Arenal F., Lavina A., et al., 1998. Occurrence, distribution, and relative incidence of mosaic viruses infecting field-grown melon in Spain. Plant Dis. 82, 979-982.10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.9.97930856849]Search in Google Scholar
[Mallah N., Obeid M., Sleymane G.A., 2017. Comprehensive matrices for regulatory approvals and genetic characterization of genetically modified organisms. Food Control 80, 52-58.10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.053]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer P., Heidmann I., 1994. Epigenetic variants of a transgenic petunia line show hypermethylation in transgene DNA: an indication for specific recognition of foreign DNA in transgenic plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 243(4), 390-399.10.1007/BF00280469]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer P., Heidmann I., Forkmann G., Saedler H., 1987. A new petunia flower colour generated by transformation of a mutant with a maize gene. Nature 330(6149), 677-678.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer P., Heidmann I., Saedler H., Forkmann G., 1995. Plants with modified flower color and methods for their production by genetic engineering. US patent 5,410,096, application by the inventors, filled 28.08.1990, published 25.04.1995. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US38462462. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOEF, 2010. Decision on commercialisation of Btbrinjal. http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/minister_REPORT.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakamura N., 2010. Dream comes true: development of a blue rose‘Applause’ and its fragrance. J. Jpn. Assoc. Odor. Environ. 41(3), 150-156.10.2171/jao.41.150]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakamura N., Fukuchi-Mizutani M., Katsumoto Y., Togami J., Senior M., Matsuda Y., et al., 2011. Environmental risk assessment and field performance of rose (Rosa×hybrida) genetically modified for delphinidin production. Plant Biotechnol. 28(2), 251-261.10.5511/plantbiotechnology.11.0113a]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakayama T., Suzuki H., Nishino T., 2003. Anthocyanin acyltransferases: specificities, mechanism, phylogenetics, and applications. J. Mol. Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 23(2-6), 117-132.10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00078-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Nap J.P., Metz P.L., Escaler M., Conner A.J., 2003. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part I. Overview of current status and regulations. Plant J. 33(1), 1-18.10.1046/j.0960-7412.2003.01602.x]Search in Google Scholar
[NBB, 2012. Application for approval for commercial import of cut flowers of novel flower colour varieties of genetically modified carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). The National Biosafety Board REF. NO: JBK(S) 602-1/1/8. http://www.biosafety.nre.gov.my/country_decision/product_lmo/jbk(s)%20602-1-1-8/Decision%20Statement%20of%20GM%20Carnation.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noda N., Aida R., Kishimoto S., Ishiguro K., Fukuchi-Mizutani M., Tanaka Y., Ohmiya A., 2013. Genetic engineering of novel bluer-colored chrysanthemums produced by accumulation of delphinidin-based anthocyanins. Plant Cell Physiol. 54(10), 1684-1695.10.1093/pcp/pct111]Search in Google Scholar
[Noda N., Tanaka Y., 2013. Violet-blue chrysanthemums. Oxford University Press’s Blog 21 November 2013. https://blog.oup.com/2013/11/violet-blue-chrysanthemum-genetic-modification. Accessed 21 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noda N., Yoshioka S., Kishimoto S., Nakayama M., Douzono M., Tanaka Y., Aida R., 2017. Generation of blue chrysanthemums by anthocyanin B-ring hydroxylation and glucosylation and its coloration mechanism. Sci. Adv. 3(7), e1602785.10.1126/sciadv.1602785]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD, 2002.Guidance for the designation of a unique identifier for transgenic plants. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocument/?doclanguage=en&cote=env/jm/mono(2002)7. Accessed 3 October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2003a. Commercial release of colour modified carnation – replacement of deemed licence GR- 2. Licence No.: DIR 030/2002. http://ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir030-3/$FILE/dir030lic.pdf Accessed on 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2003b. Risk assessment and risk management plan. Commercial release of colour modified carnation – replacement of deemed licence GR-2. DIR 030/2002. http://content.webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/wayback/20130904044522/http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir030-3/$FILE/dir030finalrarmp.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2007. Notification that dealings with genetically modified carnation lines have been included on the GMO register. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/reg001det1-htm. Accessed 22 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2009. Licence for dealings involving an intentional release of a GMO into the environment: Commercial release of rose genetically modified for altered flower colour. Licence No. DIR 090. http://ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir090-3/$FILE/dir090lic.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2015a. Commercial import and distribution of GM carnation cut-flowers with altered flower colour. Licence No.: DIR 134. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir134/$FILE/Licence%20conditions.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2015b. Risk assessment and risk management plan for DIR 134. Commercial import and distribution of GM carnation cut-flowers with altered flower colour. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir134/$FILE/Full%20Risk%20Assessment%20and%20Risk%20Management%20Plan.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGTR, 2017. Licence for dealings involving an intentional release of a GMO into the environment. Licence No.: DIR 109. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/76F9A6576471A5D0CA257CD1000D2AB3/$File/Licence%20Conditions.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[PFSEH, 2017. Labelling system for genetically modified food and proposed introduction of pre-market safety assessment scheme. Hong Kong Legislative Council paper No. CB(2)1809/16-17(01). https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr16-17/english/panels/fseh/papers/fseh20170711cb2-1809-1-e.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polak J., Kundu J.K., Krska B., Beoni E., Kominek P., Pivalova J., Jarosova J., 2017. Transgenic plum Prunus domestica L., clone C5 (cv. HoneySweet) for protection against sharka disease. J. Integr. Agric. 16(3), 516-522.10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61491-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Puette L., 2016. The splice must grow: The bright and shady sides of GM agriculture in China. Market Reports 6. http://www.chinaag.org/markets/gm-agriculture-in-china. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raghavan V., Malik P.S., Choudhury N.R., Mukherjee S.K., 2004. The DNA-A Component of a plant geminivirus (Indian Mung Bean Yellow Mosaic Virus) replicates in budding yeast cells. J. Virology 78(5), 2405-2413.10.1128/JVI.78.5.2405-2413.200436923814963136]Search in Google Scholar
[Rappler, 2016. SC reverses earlier roling on Bt talong, GMOs. https://www.rappler.com/science-nature/environment/141043-sc-reverses-ruling-bt-talonggmo. Accessed 8 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed A.J. Magin K.M., Anderson J.S., Austin G.D., Rangwala T., Linde D.C., et al., 1995. Delayed ripening tomato plants expressing the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase. 1. Molecular characterization, enzyme expression, and fruit ripening traits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43(7), 1954-1962.10.1021/jf00055a036]Search in Google Scholar
[Rimbaud L., Dallot S., Gottwald T., Decroocq V., Jacquot E., Soubeyrand S., Thébaud G., 2015. Sharka epidemiology and worldwide management strategies: learning lessons to optimize disease control in perennial plants. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 53(1), 357-378.10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-12014026047559]Search in Google Scholar
[Savin K.W., Baudinette S.C., Graham M.W., Michael M.Z., Nugent G.D., Lu C.Y., Cornish, E.C., 1995. Antisense ACC oxidase RNA delays carnation petal senescence. HortScience, 30(5), 970-972.10.21273/HORTSCI.30.5.970]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuttelaar, 2015. The regulatory status of New Breeding Techniques in countries outside the European Union. Schuttelaar & Partners. Version: June 2015. http://www.nbtplatform.org/background-documents/rep-regulatory-status-of-nbts-oustide-theeu-june-2015.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scorza R., 2006. Application for determination of non-regulatory status for C5 (‘HoneySweet’) plum (Prunus domestica L.) resistant to Plum pox virus. Identifier: ARS-PLMC5-6. http://cera-gmc.org/docs/decdocs/07-313-003.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scorza R., Callahan A., Dardick Ch., Ravelonandro M., Polak J., Malinowski T., et al., 2013. Genetic engineering of Plum pox virus resistance: ‘HoneySweet’ plum – from concept to product. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 115(1), 1-12.10.1007/s11240-013-0339-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Scorza R., Ravelonandro M., Gonsalves D., 2004. Plum tree named ‘honeysweet’. US plant patent PP15,154 P2, application by US Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique and Cornell Research Foundation, Inc., filled 31.08.2001, published 21.09.2004. https://www.lens.org/lens/patent/076-366-849-381-273. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scorza R., Ravelonandro M., Callahan A., Zagrai I., Polak J., Malinowski T., et al., 2016. ‘HoneySweet’ (C5), the first genetically engineered Plum pox virus–resistant plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivar. HortScience 51(5), 601-603.10.21273/HORTSCI.51.5.601]Search in Google Scholar
[SEARCA, 2017. Bangladesh to release 3 more Bt brinjal varieties. http://bic.searca.org/site/bangladesh-to-release-3-more-bt-brinjal-varieties/. Accessed 8 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Servick K., 2017a. How the transgenic petunia carnage of 2017. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Science news, Engineering Plants & Animals Science and Policy May 24, 2017. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/how-transgenicpetunia-carnage-2017-began. Accessed 1 February 2018.10.1126/science.aan6886]Search in Google Scholar
[Servick K., 2017b. The strange case of the orange petunias. Science 356(6340), 792.10.1126/science.356.6340.79228546164]Search in Google Scholar
[Siddique A., 2017. Bangladesh to provide incentives for farmers to grow more GMO Bt eggplant. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/10/24/bangladesh-to-provide-incentives-farmers-grow-more-gmo-bt-eggplant/#.WfBXtio81sc.twitter. Accessed 28 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smart R.D., Blum M., Wesseler J., 2017. Trends in approval times for genetically engineered crops in the United States and the European Union. J. Agric. Econ. 68(1), 182-198.10.1111/1477-9552.12171]Search in Google Scholar
[Songstad D., Petolino J., Voytas D., Reichert N., 2017. Genome editing of plants. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 36(1), 1-23.10.1080/07352689.2017.1281663]Search in Google Scholar
[Sparks B., 2018. Suntory blue rose‘Applause’ takes center stage on Grammy's Red Carpet. Greenhouse Grower 27 February 2018. http://www.greenhousegrower.com/varieties/suntory-blue-rose-applause-takes-center-stage-on-grammys-red-carpet. Accessed 23 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sprink T., Eriksson D., Schiemann J., Hartung F., 2016. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process-vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts. Plant Cell Rep. 35(7), 1493-1506.10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2490311127142995]Search in Google Scholar
[Svitashev S., Schwartz C., Lenderts B., Young J., Cigan A., 2016. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Commun. 7, 13274.10.1038/ncomms13274511608127848933]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanaka Y., Brugliera F., 2013. Flower colour and cytochromes P450. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120432.10.1098/rstb.2012.0432353842223297355]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanaka Y., Brugliera F., Chandler S., 2009. Recent progress of flower colour modification by biotechnology. Intl. J. Mol. Sci. 10(12), 5350-5369.10.3390/ijms10125350280199820054474]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanaka Y., Sasaki N., Ohmiya A,. 2008. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 54(4), 733-749.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tennant P.F., Gonsalves C., Ling K.-S., Fitch M., Manshardt R., Slightorn J.L., Gonsalves D., 1994. Differential protection against Papaya ringspot virus isolates in coat protein gene transgenic papaya and classically cross-protected papaya. Phytopathology 84, 1359-1366.10.1094/Phyto-84-1359]Search in Google Scholar
[Tricoli D.M., Carney K.J., Russell P.F., Quemada H.D., McMaster R.J., Reynolds J.F., Deng R.Z., 2002. Transgenic plants expressing DNA constructs containing a plurality of genes to impart virus resistance. US patent 6337431, applied by Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc., filled 6.10.1997, published 8.01.2002. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US39710896. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA, 2015a. Report on genetically engineered plant imports: Current and future. USDA, FY2015. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/audits/fy15_ge_plant_imports_rpt.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA, 2015b. Coexistence fact sheets: Specialty farming. USDA Factsheet, February 2015. https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/coexistence-specialty-farming-factsheet.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA, 2016. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 28. USDA-ARS. https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list?qlookup=09003. Accessed 24 September 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA Press, 2018. Secretary Perdue issues USDA statement on plant breeding innovation. USDA Office of Communications. Press Release No. 0070.18 of 28 March 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vellekoop E., 2015. Genetic modification accepted in floriculture. Floral Daily 28 September 2015. http://www.floraldaily.com/article/2105/Genetic-modification-accepted-in-floriculture. Accessed 20 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vellekoop E., 2017. Blue roses do not come out of the blue. Floral Daily 13 October 2017. http://www.floraldaily.com/article/12179/Blue-roses-do-not-come-out-of-the-blue. Accessed 23 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wawrzyniak A., Marciniak A., Rajewska J., 2005. Lycopene content of selected foods available on the Polish market and estimation of its intake. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 14/55(2), 195-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolt J., Wang K., Yang B., 2016. The regulatory status of genome-edited crops. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14(2), 510-518.10.1111/pbi.12444504209526251102]Search in Google Scholar
[Wong A.Y.-T., Chan A.W.-K., 2016. Genetically modified foods in China and the United States: A primer of regulation and intellectual property protection. Food Sci. Human Wellness 5, 124-140.10.1016/j.fshw.2016.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[WTO, 2008. EC approval and marketing of biotech products. Dispute Settlement Reports 2006, Volume IV: Pages 1249 to 1754, Cambridge University Press, 1529.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeh S.-D., Bau H.-J., Cheng Y.-H., Fan Ch.-Ch., Kung Y.-J., Chen S., et al., 2011. Isolated nucleic acid molecules from transgenic papaya line 16-0-1 resistant to papaya ringspot virus and use thereof. US patent 8,258,282 B2, application by National Chung Hsing University, filled 23.12.2009, published 28.04.2011. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US73224496. Accessed 19 June 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yokotani N., Nakano R., Imanishi S., Nagata M., Inaba A., Kubo Y., 2009. Ripening-associated ethylene biosynthesis in tomato fruit is autocatalytically and developmentally regulated. J. Exp. Bot. 60(12), 3433-3442.10.1093/jxb/erp185272469719605457]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoruk R., Marshall M.R., 2003. Physicochemical properties and function of plant polyphenol oxidase: A review. J. Food Biochem. 27, 361-422.10.1111/j.1745-4514.2003.tb00289.x]Search in Google Scholar
