[1. Achtemeier, S. D., Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2003). Considerations for developing evaluations of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 1-13.10.24059/olj.v7i1.1859]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Alimisis, D., & Plessas, A. (2011). Teacher Distance Training in Educational Robotics through Synchronous Audiographic Conferencing: towards a Learner-centered Approach. Proceedings of the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 901-906. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Anastasiades, P. (2008a). The Interactive Teleconference at the Modern School: A Framework for Teaching Design. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation: Communication and Information Technologies in Education. Limassol 25-28 September 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Anastasiades, P.S. (2008b). Teleconference in the service of life-long learning and distance education. Pedagogical applications of collaborative distance learning from the Hellenic post-secondary education. Athens: Gutenberg (in Greek).]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Armakolas, S., Alimisis, D., & Panagiotakopoulos, Ch. (2013). The Flashmeeting Digital Platform: A I am not scared Project for school violence study. Proceedings of ICODL, 192-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Armakolas, S., Mikroyannidis, A., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Panousopoulou, S. (2016). A case study on the Perceptions of Educators on the Penetration of Personal Learning Environments in Typical Education. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 6(1), 18-28. doi: 10.4018/IJVPLE.2016010102.10.4018/IJVPLE.2016010102]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Fragoulis, I. (2014). The distance learning of courses between branches of ASPETE. Using the Flashmeeting digital platform. Proceedings of the 9th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation “Information and Communication Technologies in Education”, University of Crete, 451-458.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Vasilopoulou, G. (2014). The Learning Environment in a Virtual Videoconference Classroom and Transforming Learning. Proceedings of the 9th Panhellenic Conference “Greek Pedagogical and Educational Research”, University of Western Macedonia, vol. A, 339-353]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Athanasiou, L. (2000). Methods and Techniques of Research in Educational Sciences. Ioannina.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Menlo Park: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/Hewlett_OER_report.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 359–375.10.2190/94V6-R58H-3367-G388]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Baynton, M. (1992). Dimensions of “control” in distance education: A factor analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 17-31.10.1080/08923649209526783]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Bell, J. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Castañeda, L., Cosgrave, M., Marin, V., & Cronin, C. (2016). Personal Learning Environments: PLE Conference 2015 Special Issue Guest Editorial. Digital Education Review, 29.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Castañeda, L., Dabbagh, N., & Torres-Kompen, R. (2017). Personal Learning Environments: Research-Based Practices, Frameworks and Challenges. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 1.10.7821/naer.2017.1.229]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Chaney, B. H., Eddy, J. M., Dorman, S. M., Glessner, L. L., Green, B. L., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2009). A primer on quality indicators of distance education. Health Promotion Practice, 10(2), 222-231.10.1177/1524839906298498]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 404-420.10.1504/IJKL.2007.016702]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1997). Methodology of Educational Research. Athens: Expression.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Coureau, S. (2000). The basic “tools” of the adult educator. Athens: Metaixmio.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 24-35.10.1080/08923649109526729]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Dobbs, R. R., Waid, C. A., & del Carmen, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 9-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Dunn, K. (2000). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Ehlers, U. D., & Pawlowski, J. M. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-learning. Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/3-540-32788-6]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Fiedler, S. H., & Väljataga, T. (2011). Personal learning environments: concept or technology? International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 2(4), 1-11.10.4018/jvple.2011100101]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Fotiadou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2017). Learner Autonomy as a Factor of the Learning Process in Distance Education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(1), 95-110.10.1515/eurodl-2017-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Giannakoudakis, Z., & Giossos, G. (2017). Differences between Regular and Distance Education in a Teacher’s Training Program. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(2), 17-29.10.1515/eurodl-2017-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance Education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 355-395). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 873-879.10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.018]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Issing, L. J. (2002). Instruktions-Design für Multimedia. In L.J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Informationen und Lernen mit Multimedia and Internet. Lehrbuch für Studium und Praxis (3rd ed.) (pp.151–178). Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologische Verlags Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Jarvis, P. (1999). Adult & Continuing Education (2nd ed.) London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The Horizon Report: 2011 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Khan, B. H. (Ed.) (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-59140-634-1]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Κnowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Bozkurt, A., & Buyuk, K. (2018). Measuring Self-Regulation in Self-Paced Open and Distance Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1).10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3255]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2014). Developing a framework for research on Personal Learning Environments. E-learning in Europe Journal, 35. Retrieved on 02/02/2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262103299_Developing_a_framework_for_research_on_personal_learning_environments]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Koutsoukos, M., Fragoulis, I., & Valkanos, E. (2015). Connection of environmental education with application of experiential teaching methods: A case study from Greece. International Education Studies, 8(4), 23.10.5539/ies.v8n4p23]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews, An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Kyriazopoulos, P., & Samanta, E. (2011). Methodology for researching diploma theses. Athens: Sychroni Ekdotiki.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Laube, M. R. (1992). Academic and Social Integration Variables and Secondary Student Persistence in Distance Education. Research in Distance Education, 4(1), 2-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Laurillard D. (2012), Teaching as a Design Science. Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. N.Y.: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Lionarakis, A., & Lykourgiotis, A. (1999). Open and Traditional Education. In D. Vergides, A. Lionarakis, A. Lykourgiotis, V. Makrakis, & C. Matralis (Eds.), Open and distance education: Institutions and functions (vol. A, pp.31-32). Patras: Hellenic Open University Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Maloof, J. (2006). Experience This! The Experiential Approach to Teaching Environmental Issues. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 5, 193-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533015060091474310.1080/15330150600914743]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[45. Mavroidis, H. (2009). Possibility and conditions for the use of modern communication and e-learning methods in programs of the Hellenic Open University School of Humanities. Case study in parts of the EWC65. Postgraduate thesis. Hellenic Open University.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Mavroidis, I., Karatrantou, A., Koutsouba, M., Giossos, Y., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Technology acceptance and social presence in distance education–A case study on the use of teleconference at a postgraduate course of the Hellenic Open University. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 16(2).]Search in Google Scholar
[47. McGloughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.10.14742/ajet.1100]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly T., & Law, E. (2012). A survey into the teacher’s perception of self-regulated learning. Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 696–697.10.1109/ICALT.2012.69]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly, T., Law, E. L. C., Schmitz, H. C. Vieritz, H., Nussbaumer, A. Berthold, M., Ullrich, C., & Dhir, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning in formal education: perceptions, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 145-163.10.1504/IJTEL.2014.066860]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Nikolaki, E., & Koutsoumpa, M. (2013). Self-regulated learning in distance education. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 9(1), 19-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Panagiotakopoulos, C., (2014). Information and Communication Technologies: An overall view. Athens.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Panagiotakopoulos, C., Tsiatsos, T., Lionarakis A., & Tzanakos N. (2013). Teleconference in support of distance learning: Views of educators. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 9(1), 5-18.10.12681/jode.9806]Search in Google Scholar
[54. von Prummer, C. (1990). Study Motivation of Distance Students: A Report on Some Results from a Survey Done at the FernUniversitat in 1987/88. Research in Distance Education, 2(2), 2-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Smith, M. M. (2011). The quality factors which influence online learning and impact on the student experience (Doctoral dissertation). Open University.]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017). Investigating the Role of Structure in Online Teachers’ Communities of Learning. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 161-174). Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-34127-9_12]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Türker, M. A., & Zingel, S. (2008). Formative interfaces for scaffolding self-regulated learning in PLEs. Elearning papers, 14(9, July).]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Tzanakos, N. (2012). The positive and negative aspects in the use of teleconference as an educational tool, from the perspective of educators. Master Thesis. Patra: Hellenic Open University.]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Valkanos, E., & Fragoulis, I. (2007). Experiential learning–its place in in-house education and training. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 21(5), 21-23.10.1108/14777280710779454]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Vlachopoulos, P., & Hatzigianni, M. (2017). Online Learning and Self-Regulation: Balancing Between Personal and Social Dimensions. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 177-188). Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-34127-9_13]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Speck, B. W. (2000). Principles of Effective Teaching in the Online Classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.10.1002/tl.8400]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Welsh, J. B. (2007). Identifying factors that predict student success in a community college online distance learning course. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Texas Digital Library. (OCLC: 230804538). Retrieved on 02/05/2018 from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5111/?q=Identifying%20factors%20that%20predict%20student%20success%20in%20a%20community%20college%20online%20%20 distance%20learning%20course]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Wiesenberg, F., & Stacey, E. (2005). Reflections on Teaching and Learning Online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education, 26(3), 385-404.10.1080/01587910500291496]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of personal learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17-34.10.1080/10494820701772660]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Xenos, M., Tsiatsios, Th., & Vassiliadis, B. (2008). Large-scale deployment of distance education in computer science at the Hellenic Open University. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(2/3), 285-297.10.1504/IJKL.2008.020669]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Yen, C. J., Tu, C. H., Sujo-Montes, L., & Sealander, K. (2016). A Predictor for PLE Management: Impacts of Self-Regulated Online Learning on Student’s Learning Skills. Journal of Educational Technology Development & Exchange, 9(1), 29-48.10.18785/jetde.0901.03]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Zimmermann, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Theoretical Perspective. N.Y.: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
