[Crisp, Roger. 2000. Review of Value … And What Follows, by Joel Kupperman, Philosophy,75.10.1017/S0031819100230519]Search in Google Scholar
[Crisp, Roger. 2005. Value, Reasons, and the Structure of Justification: How to Avoid Passing the Buck. Analysis65.10.1093/analys/65.1.80]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[D’Arms, Justin and Jacobson, Daniel. 2000. Sentiment and Value. Ethics110.10.1086/233371]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibbard, Allan. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabinowicz, Wlodek and Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni. 2004. The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-attitudes and Value. Ethics114.10.1086/381694]Search in Google Scholar
[Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What we Owe to Each Other.London: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skorupski, John. 2005. Blame, Respect and Recognition: A reply to Theo van Willigenburg. Utilitas17.10.1017/S0953820805001688]Search in Google Scholar
[Skorupski, John. 2006. Propositions about Reasons. The European Journal of Philosophy14.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00242.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Skorupski, John. 2007. Buckpassing About Goodness. In Hommage à Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.Ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson & D. Egonsson, 2007, where I also give definitions of good for x, good of x, and functional goodness. (http://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/SkorupskiJohn.pdf).]Search in Google Scholar