[1. Adomeit, Hannes. “Germany, the EU, and Russia: The Conflict over Nord Stream 2.” Centre for European Studies, CES Policy Brief (April 2016): 1-12 // https://carleton.ca/ces/wp-content/uploads/Adomeit-policy-brief.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Andreone, Gemma. “The Exclusive Economic Zone”: 159-180. In: Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elferink, Karen Scott, and Tim Stephens, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).10.1093/law/9780198715481.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Beckman, Karel. “Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller: ‘This is the beginning of the end of Gazprom’s business model in Europe’.” Energypost (December 8, 2014) // http://energypost.eu/gazprom-ceo-alexei-miller-beginning-end-gazproms-model.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. De Maio, Giovanna. “A Tale of Two Countries: Italy, Germany, and Russian Gas.” Center on the United States and Europe at Brookings, U.S. – Europe Working Paper (August 18, 2016): 1-15 // https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/fp_20160818_demaio_tale_of_two_countrie.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Duxbury, Graham. A Guide to Energy Forecasting: …part exercise in smoke and mirrors (Kibworth Beauchamp: Matador Publishing, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fischer, Severin. “Nord Stream 2: Trust in Europe.” Policy Perspectives Vol. 4(4) (March 2016): 1-4 // http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/PP4-4.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Grigas, Agnia. The New Geopolitics of Natural Gas (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2017).10.4159/9780674978065]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hecking, Harald, Simon Schulte, Adnan Vatansever, and Slawomir Raszewski. “Options for Gas Supply Diversification for the EU and Germany in the next Two Decades.” Ewi Energy Research & Scenarios gGmbH, European Centre for Energy and Resource Security (October 2016): 1-116 // http://www.ewi.research-scenarios.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Options-for-Gas-Supply-Diversification.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Heinrich, Andreas. “Securitisation in the Gas Sector: Energy Security Debates Concerning the Example of the Nord Stream Pipeline”: 61-91. In: Kacper Szulecki, ed. Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_3]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Herranz-Surrallés, Anna. “Energy diplomacy under scrutiny: parliamentary control of intergovernmental agreements with third-country suppliers.” West European Politics 40(1) (2017): 183–201.10.1080/01402382.2016.1240406]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Honoré, Anouk. “What Outlook for European Gas Demand? An Overview of Possible Scenarios”: 49-71. In: Manfred Hafner and Simone Tagliapietra, eds. The European Gas Markets: Challenges and Opportunities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).10.1007/978-3-319-55801-1_3]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Johnston, Angus, and Guy Block. EU Energy Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Jones, Christopher, ed. EU Energy Law. Volume I. The Internal Energy Market (Leuven: Claeys & Casteels, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Karm, Ellen. “Environment and Energy: The Baltic Sea Gas Pipeline.” Journal of Baltic Studies 39(2) (2008): 99–121.10.1080/01629770802031200]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Knodt, Michèle, and Anne Tews. “European Solidarity and Its Limits: Insights from Current Political Challenges”: 47-64. In: Andreas Grimmel and Susanne My Giang, eds. Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis (Berlin: Springer, 2017).10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_5]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kostianoy, Andrey, Olga Lavrova, Marina Mityagina, and Dmytro Solovyov. “Satellite Monitoring of the Nord Stream Gas Pipeline Construction in the Gulf of Finland”: 221-248. In: Andrey Kostianoy and Olga Lavrova, eds. Oil Pollution in the Baltic Sea (Berlin: Springer, 2014).10.1007/698_2012_178]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kropatcheva, Elena. “EC’s Anti-Trust Inquiry into Gazprom’s Practices: Its Significance and Meaning for Gazprom’s Role in the EU Market.” Russian Analytical Digest No. 174 (26 October 2015): 1-19 // https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/194606/Russian_Analytical_Digest_177.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Krzykowski, Michał, and Karolina Krzykowska. “Will the European Commission’s policy hinder gas supplies to Central and Eastern European countries? OPAL case decision.” Energy Policy 110(11) (2017): 534–541.10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.041]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lang, Kai-Olaf, and Kirsten Westphal. “Nord Stream 2 – A Political and Economic Contextualisation.” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Research Paper 3/2017: 1-39 // http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/51318.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Leal-Arcas, Rafael, Costantino Grasso, and Juan Alemany, Rios. Energy Security, Trade and the EU: Regional and International Perspectives (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016).10.4337/9781785366741]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Łoskot-Strachota, Agata. “The case against Nord Stream 2.” Energypost (November 23, 2015) // http://energypost.eu/case-nord-stream-2.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Łoskot-Strachota, Agata. “The OPAL pipeline: controversies about the rules for its use and the question of supply security.” Centre for Eastern Studies, Commentary No. 229 (January 2017): 1-9 // https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2017-01-17/opal-pipeline-controversies-about-rules-its-use-and-question.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Lott, Alexander. “Marine Environmental Protection and Transboundary Pipeline Projects: A Case Study of the Nord Stream Pipeline.” Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 27(73) (2011): 55–67.10.5334/ujiel.aq]Search in Google Scholar
[24. McDorman, Ted. “The Continental Shelf”: 181-202. In: Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elferink, Karen Scott, and Tim Stephens, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).10.1093/law/9780198715481.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Mitrova, Tatiana. “The New Russian Gas Export Strategy After the Ukraine Crisis”: 195-225. In: Manfred Hafner and Simone Tagliapietra, eds. The European Gas Markets: Challenges and Opportunities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).10.1007/978-3-319-55801-1_9]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Niculescu, George. “The Geopolitics of Energy in the South Caucasus and the Prospects for Regional Energy Security Cooperation”: 51-59. In: Jurate Novogrockiene and Eva Siaulyte, eds. Addressing Emerging Security Risks for Energy Networks in South Caucasus (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Noyes, John. “The Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone”: 91-113. In: Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elferink, Karen Scott, and Tim Stephens, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).10.1093/law/9780198715481.003.0005]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Offenberg, Philipp. “The European Neighbourhood and the EU’s Security of Supply With Natural Gas.” Jacques Delors Institut, Berlin, Policy Paper 156/2016: 1-26 // http://www.delorsinstitute.eu/011-22328-The-European-neighbourhood-andthe-EU-s-security-of-supply-with-natural-gas.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Popławski, Konrad. “German energy companies lobby for Nord Stream 2.” Centre for Eastern Studies, Analyses (September 2016) // https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2016-09-21/german-energy-companies-lobby-nord-stream-2.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Prange-Gstöhl, Heiko. “Enlarging the EU’s internal energy market: Why would third countries accept EU rule export?” Energy Policy 37(12) (2009): 5296–5303.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.070]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Proedrou, Filippos. EU Energy Security in the Gas Sector: Evolving Dynamics, Policy Dilemmas and Prospects (London: Routledge, 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Prontera, Andreas. The New Politics of Energy Security in the European Union and Beyond: States, Markets, Institutions (London: Routledge, 2017).10.4324/9781315555126]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Raszewski, Slawomir. “Russian energy projects and the global climate, geopolitics and development conundrum”: 215-234. In: Rafael Leal-Arcas and Jan Wouters, eds. Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).10.4337/9781786431059.00021]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Riley, Alan. “Commission v. Gazprom: The antitrust clash of the decade?” CEPS Policy Brief No. 285 (31 October 2012): 1-14 // https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/PB%20No%20285%20AR%20Commission%20v%20Gazprom_0.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Riley, Alan. “Nord Stream 2: A Legal and Policy Analysis.” CEPS Special Report No. 151 (November 2016): 1-27 // https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/SR151AR%20Nordstream2.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Schubert, Samuel, Johannes Pollak, and Maren Kreutler. Energy Policy of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).10.1007/978-1-137-38884-1]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Sharples, Jack, and Andrew Judge. “Russian Gas Supplies to Europe: The Likelihood, and Potential Impact, of an Interruption in Gas Transit via Ukraine.” The European Geopolitical Forum (March 24, 2014): 1-13 // http://gpf-europe.com/forum/?page=post&blog=energy&id=157.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Talus, Kim. “Decades of EU energy policy: towards politically driven markets.” Journal of World Energy Law and Business 10(5) (2017): 380–388.10.1093/jwelb/jwx027]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Talus, Kim. EU Energy Law and Policy: A Critical Account (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686391.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Talus, Kim. Introduction to EU Energy Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198791812.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Talus, Kim. “Application of certain EU energy and national laws of the Baltic Sea countries to the Nord Stream pipeline project 2.” Journal of World Energy Law & Business 10(1) (2017): 30–42.10.1093/jwelb/jww037]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Van de Graaf, Thijs. “Rule-maker or rule-taker? The EU and the shifting global political economy of energy”: 165-178. In: Rafael Leal-Arcas and Jan Wouters, eds. Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).10.4337/9781786431059.00018]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Vatansever, Adnan. “Is Russia building too many pipelines? Explaining Russia’s oil and gas export strategy.” Energy Policy 108(1) (2017): 1–11.10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.038]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Vavilov, Andrey, Galina Kovalishina, and Georgy Trofimov. “The New Export Routes and Gazprom’s Strategic Opportunities in Europe”: 180-217. In: Andrey Vavilov, ed. Gazprom: An Energy Giant and Its Challenges in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).10.1057/9781137461100_7]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Yafimava, Katja. “The OPAL Exemption Decision: past, present, and future.” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (January 2017): 1-35 // https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/The-OPAL-Exemption-Decision-past-present-and-future-NG-117.pdf.10.26889/9781784670771]Search in Google Scholar
[1. A. Salemink v. Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen. C-347/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:17.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Aktiebolaget NN v. Skatteverket. C-111/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:195.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Commission staff working document on Article 22 of Directive 2003/55/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity – New Infrastructure Exemptions. SEC(2009) 642 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Commission Staff Working Document: In-depth study of European Energy Security. SWD (2014) 330 final/3.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Commission v. Greece. C-331/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:211.10.1016/0375-9601(95)00955-8]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Commission v. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. C-6/04, ECLI:EU:C:2005:626.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Cornelis Kramer and others. Cases 3, 4 and 6/76, ECLI:EU:C:1976:114.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Decision of BNetzA of 25 February 2009, amended by decision of BNetzA of 7 July 2009. Case BK7-08-009.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC. OJ L 176, 15.7.2003, p. 57.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 94.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Herbert Weber v. Universal Ogden Services Ltd. C-37/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:122.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. L. Kik v. Staatssecretaris van Finaciën. C-266/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:188.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH v. Commission. T-849/16 R, ECLI:EU:T:2017:544.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH v. Commission. T-849/16.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Poland v. Commission. T-883/16.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas. COM(2017) 660 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators. OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005. OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 36.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2017 concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010. OJ L 280, 28.10.2017, p. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. The EC Communication: European Energy Security Strategy. COM (2014) 330 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. The EC Decision of 12 June 2009 on regulatory exemption for OPAL pipeline. COM(2009) 4694 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. The EC Decision of 16 May 2013 on the exemption of the Trans Adriatic Pipeline from the requirements of Directive 2009/73/EC. C (2013) 2949 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. The EC Decision of 20 April 2009 on regulatory exemption for the Bulgarian section of the Nabucco pipeline. C (2009) 3037.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. The EC Decision of 28 October 2016 on review of regulatory exemption for OPAL pipeline. C (2016) 6950 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. The EC Decision of 8 February 2008 on regulatory exemption for the Austrian section of the Nabucco pipeline. CAB D (2008) 142.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. The Opinion of the legal services of the Council of the EU of 27 September 2017 on the operation of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline // http://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SPOLITICO-17092812480.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
