How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?

1. Wager E, Kleinert S. 2012. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Maturitas 2012; 72: 165-9.10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.01122541357Search in Google Scholar

2. COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). Flowcharts. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

3. CSE (Council of Science Editors). Sample correspondence for an editorial office. Available at: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/ editorial-policies/sample-correspondence-for-aneditorial- office/ Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

4. Wager E. Coping with scientific misconduct. BMJ 2011; 343: d6586.10.1136/bmj.d658622016451Search in Google Scholar

5. Elsevier. Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (PERK). Available at: http://www.elsevier.com/editors/perk Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

6. Wager E, Kleinert S. Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors. A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/International%20sta ndards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

7. Wiley-Blackwell. Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: A Publisher's perspective. Available at: http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/publicationet hics.asp Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. WAME (World Association of Medical Editors). The Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. Available at: www.wame.org Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

9. COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). Code of conduct. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

10. COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). Retraction guidelines. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guideli nes.pdf Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

11. COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). Sharing of information among editors-in-chief regarding possible misconduct. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/u661/Forum_discussio n_summary_on_Sharing%20of%20information%20am ong%20editors_Final.pdf Accessed: Aug 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

12. Elia N, Tramèr M, Wager E. Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study. PLOS One 2014; 9:e85846.10.1371/journal.pone.0085846389911324465744Search in Google Scholar

13. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144: 609-13.10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-0012316522625Search in Google Scholar

14. Wager E. Defining and responding to plagiarism. Learned Publishing. 2014; 27: 33-42.10.1087/20140105Search in Google Scholar

15. Wager E, Williams P. Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013; 19: 1-11.10.1007/s11948-011-9292-021761244Search in Google Scholar

16. Wager E, Kleinert S. Cooperation between Journals, Research Institutions and Funders over Research and Publication Integrity Cases: Defining the Challenges. Chapter in: Steneck NH, Anderson MS, Kleinert S, Mayer T, editors. Integrity in the Global Research Arena. World Scientific Press, Singapore. 2014/15. In press.10.1142/9789814632393_0022Search in Google Scholar